1 / 64

Particle Physics from Tevatron to LHC: what we know and what we hope to discover

Particle Physics from Tevatron to LHC: what we know and what we hope to discover. Beate Heinemann, UC Berkeley and LBNL Università di Pisa, February 2010. Outline. Introduction Outstanding problems in particle physics and the role of hadron colliders

yamka
Download Presentation

Particle Physics from Tevatron to LHC: what we know and what we hope to discover

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Particle Physics from Tevatron to LHC:what we know and what we hope to discover Beate Heinemann, UC Berkeley and LBNL Università di Pisa, February 2010

  2. Outline • Introduction • Outstanding problems in particle physics • and the role of hadron colliders • Current and near future colliders: Tevatron and LHC • Standard Model Measurements • Hadron-hadron collisions • Cross Section Measurements of jets, W/Z bosons and top quarks • Constraints on and Searches for the Higgs Boson • W boson and Top quark mass measurements • Standard Model Higgs Boson • Searches for New Physics • Supersymmetry • Higgs Bosons beyond the Standard Model • High Mass Resonances (Extra Dimensions etc.) • First Results from the 2009 LHC run

  3. Hadron-Hadron Collisions

  4. Calculating a Cross Section • Cross section is convolution of pdf’s and Matrix Element • Calculations are done in perturbative QCD • Possible due to factorization of hard ME and pdf’s • Can be treated independently • Strong coupling (s) is large • Higher orders needed • Calculations complicated

  5. The Proton Composition p Q2 X xBj p • It’s complicated: • Valence quarks, Gluons, Sea quarks • Exact mixture depends on: • Q2: ~(M2+pT2) • Björken-x: • fraction or proton momentum carried by parton • Energy of parton collision: ˆ MX = √s

  6. The Proton is Messy underlying event p parton distribution functions X = W, Z, top, jets, SUSY, H, … p • We don’t know • Which partons hit each other • What their momentum is • What the other partons do • We know roughly (2-30%) • The parton content of the proton • The cross sections of processes higher-order pQCD corrections; accompanying radiation, jets Q/GeV

  7. Every Event is Complicated H ZZ+-+-) • “Underlying event”: • Initial state radiation • Interactions of other partons in proton • Additional pp interactions • On average 20 at design luminosity of LHC • Many forward particles escape detection • Transverse momentum ~0 • Longitudinal momentum >>0

  8. Number of Particles per Event • First measurements of ALICE and CMS • Number of particles per unit η: • 3.5 at 0.9 TeV and 4.5 at 2.36 TeV => ≈ 6 at 7 TeV?

  9. Kinematic Constraints and Variables p pT  pz • Transverse momentum, pT • Particles that escape detection (<3o) have pT≈0 • Visible transverse momentum conserved ∑i pTi≈0 • Very useful variable! • Longitudinal momentum and energy, pz and E • Particles that escape detection have large pz • Visible pz is not conserved • Not a useful variable • Polar angle  • Polar angle  is not Lorentz invariant • Rapidity: y • Pseudorapidity:  For M=0

  10. Parton Kinematics pdf’s measured in deep-inelastic scattering • Examples: • Higgs: M~100 GeV/c2 • LHC: <xp>=100/14000≈0.007 • TeV: <xp>=100/2000≈0.05 • Gluino: M~1000 GeV/c2 • LHC: <xp>=1000/14000≈0.07 • TeV: <xp>=1000/2000≈0.5 • Parton densities rise dramatically towards low x • Results in larger cross sections for LHC, e.g. • factor ~1000 for gluinos • factor ~40 for Higgs • factor ~10 for W’s (at √s=14 TeV)

  11. Ratio of Luminosity: LHC at 7 TeV vs Tevatron • Power of collider can be fully characterized by ratio of parton luminosities • Ratio larger for gg than qq • Due to steap rise of gluon towards low x • MX=100 GeV • gg: R≈10, e.g. Higgs • qq: R≈3, e.g. W and Z • MX=800 GeV • gg: R≈1000, e.g. SUSY • qq: R≈20, e.g. Z’

  12. More on Parton Luminosities • Looking at these in detail gives excellent idea about relative power of LHC vs Tevatron, i.e. • How much luminosity is needed for process X at LHC to supersede the Tevatron? • And how much is gained later when going to 14 TeV • Plots from C. Quigg: LHC Physics Potential versus Energy, arXiv: 0908.3660

  13. Standard Model Cross Section Measurements as test of QCD • Jets • W and Z bosons • Top Quark Production

  14. What is a Cross Section? • Differential cross section: d/d: • Probability of a scattered particle in a given quantum state per solid angle d • E.g. Rutherford scattering experiment • Other differential cross sections: d/dET(jet) • Probability of a jet with given ET • Integrated cross section • Integral:  =∫d/d d =(Nobs-Nbg)/(L) Measurement: Luminosity

  15. Cross Sections at LHC • A lot more “uninteresting” than “interesting” processes at design luminosity (L=1034 cm-2s-1) • Any event: 109 / second • W boson: 150 / second • Top quark: 8 / second • Higgs (150 GeV): 0.2 / second • Trigger filters out interesting processes • Makes fast decision of whether to keep an event at all for analysis • Crucial at hadron colliders • Dramatic increase of some cross sections from Tevatron to LHC • Improved discovery potential at LHC Cross section (nb)

  16. Luminosity Measurement • Measure events with 0 interactions • Related to Rpp • Normalize to measured inelastic pp cross section • Tevatron: 60.7+/-2.4 mb • LHC: 70-120 mb ? CDF pp (mb) E710/E811

  17. Jet Cross Sections • Inclusive jets: processes qq, qg, gg • Highest ET probes shortest distances • Tevatron: rq<10-18 m • LHC: rq<10-19 m (?) • Could e.g. reveal substructure of quarks • Tests perturbative QCD at highest energies

  18. Jet Cross Section History • Run I (1996): • Excess at high ET • Could be signal for quark substructure?!? Data/CTEQ3M data/theory – 1, %

  19. Jet Cross Section History • Since Run I: • Revision of parton density functions • Gluon is uncertain at high x • It including these data describes data well Data/CTEQ4HJ Data/CTEQ3M data/theory – 1, %

  20. Jet Cross Sections in Run II • Excellent agreement with QCD calculation over 8 orders of magnitude! • No excess any more at high ET • Large pdf uncertainties will be constrained by these data

  21. New Physics or PDF’s? • Measure in different rapidity bins: • New physics: high pT and central y (  high Q2) • PDF’s: high y (  high x)

  22. High Mass Dijet Event: M=1.4 TeV

  23. Jets at the LHC • Much higher rates than at the Tevatron • Gluon dominated production • At 500 GeV: ~1000 times more jets (√s = 7 TeV) √s=14 TeV CMS: 100 pb-1

  24. W and Z Bosons • Focus on leptonic decays: • Hadronic decays ~impossible due to enormous QCD dijet background • Selection: • Z: • Two leptons pT>20 GeV • Electron, muon, tau • W: • One lepton pT>20 GeV • Large imbalance in transverse momentum • Missing ET>20 GeV • Signature of undetected particle (neutrino) • Excellent calibration signal for many purposes: • Electron energy scale • Track momentum scale • Lepton ID and trigger efficiencies • Missing ET resolution • Luminosity …

  25. Lepton Identification • Electrons: • compact electromagnetic cluster in calorimeter • Matched to track • Muons: • Track in the muon chambers • Matched to track • Taus: • Narrow jet • Matched to one or three tracks • Neutrinos: • Imbalance in transverse momentum • Inferred from total transverse energy measured in detector • More on this in Lecture 4

  26. Electron and Muon Identification • Desire: • High efficiency for isolated electrons • Low misidentification of jets • Performance: • Efficiency: • 60-100% depending on || • Measured using Z’s

  27. Electrons and Jets Hadronic Calorimeter Energy • Jets can look like electrons, e.g.: • photon conversions from 0’s: • ~30% of photons convert in ATLAS (13% in CDF) • early showering charged pions • And there are lots of jets!!! Electromagnetic Calorimeter Energy

  28. Jets faking Electrons • Jets can pass electron ID cuts, • Mostly due to • early showering charged pions • Conversions:0ee+X • Semileptonic b-decays • Difficult to model in MC • Hard fragmentation • Detailed simulation of calorimeter and tracking volume • Measured in inclusive jet data at various ET thresholds • Prompt electron content negligible: • Njet~10 billion at 50 GeV! • Fake rate per jet: • CDF, tight cuts: 1/10000 • ATLAS, tight cuts: 1/80000 • Typical uncertainties 50% Jets faking “loose” electrons Fake Rate (%)

  29. W’s and Z’s • Z mass reconstruction • Invariant mass of two leptons • Sets electron energy scale by comparison to LEP measured value • W mass reconstruction • Do not know neutrino pZ • No full mass resonstruction possible • Transverse mass:

  30. Tevatron W and Z Cross Section Results sTh,NNLO=2687±54pb W Z sTh,NNLO=251.3±5.0pb • Uncertainties: • Experimental: 2% • Theortical: 2% • Luminosity: 6% • Can we use these processes to normalize luminosity? • Is theory reliable enough?

  31. More Differential W/Z Measurements d/dy d/dM

  32. LHC signals of W’s and Z’s with 50 pb-1 • 50 pb-1 yield clean signals • Factor ~2 smaller yield at 7 TeV • Experimental precision • ~5% for 50 pb-1 ~10% (luminosity) • ~2.5% for 1 fb-1 ~10% (luminosity)

  33. Top Quark Production and Decay • At Tevatron, mainly produced in pairs via the strong interaction • Decay via the electroweak interactions Final state is characterized by the decay of the W boson Dilepton Lepton+Jets All-Jets 85% 15% Br(t Wb) ~ 100% Different sensitivity and challenges in each channel

  34. How to identify the top quark SM: tt pair production, Br(tbW)=100% , Br(Wlv)=1/9=11% dilepton (4/81) 2 leptons + 2 jets + missing ET l+jets (24/81) 1 lepton + 4 jets + missing ET fully hadronic (36/81) 6 jets (here: l=e,)

  35. How to identify the top quark b-jets lepton(s) missing ET SM: tt pair production, Br(tbW)=100% , Br(W->lv)=1/9=11% dilepton (4/81) 2 leptons + 2 jets + missing ET lepton+jets (24/81) 1 lepton + 4 jets + missing ET fully hadronic (36/81) 6 jets

  36. How to identify the top quark b-jets lepton(s) missing ET more jets SM: tt pair production, Br(tbW)=100% , Br(W->lv)=1/9=11% dilepton (4/81) 2 leptons + 2 jets + missing ET lepton+jets (24/81) 1 lepton + 4 jets + missing ET fully hadronic (36/81) 6 jets

  37. How to identify the top quark b-jets more jets SM: tt pair production, Br(tbW)=100% , Br(W->lv)=1/9=11% dilepton (4/81) 2 leptons + 2 jets + missing ET lepton+jets (24/81) 1 lepton + 4 jets + missing ET fully hadronic (36/81) 6 jets

  38. Top Event Categories

  39. Finding the Top at Tevatron and LHCwithout b-quark identification • Tevatron: • Top is overwhelmed by backgrounds: • Even for 4 jets S/B is only about 0.8 • Use b-jets to purify sample • LHC • Signal clear even without b-tagging: S/B is about 1.5-2 Tevatron LHC

  40. Finding the b-jets • Exploit large lifetime of the b-hadron • B-hadron flies before it decays: d=c • Lifetime  =1.5 ps-1 • d=c = 460 m • Can be resolved with silicon detector resolution • Procedure “Secondary Vertex”: • reconstruct primary vertex: • resolution ~ 30 m • Search tracks inconsistent with primary vertex (large d0): • Candidates for secondary vertex • See whether three or two of those intersect at one point • Require displacement of secondary from primary vertex • Form Lxy: transverse decay distance projected onto jet axis: • Lxy>0: b-tag along the jet direction => real b-tag or mistag • Lxy<0: b-tag opposite to jet direction => mistag! • Significance: e.g. Lxy / Lxy >7 (i.e. 7 significant displacement) • More sophisticated techniques exist

  41. Characterise the B-tagger: Efficiency • Efficiency of tagging a true b-jet • Use Data sample enriched in b-jets • Select jets with electron or muons • From semi-leptonic b-decay • Measure efficiency in data and MC Achieve efficiency of about 40-50% at Tevatron

  42. Characterise the B-tagger: Mistag rate • Mistag Rate measurement: • Probability of light quarks to be misidentified • Use “negative” tags: Lxy<0 • Can only arise due to misreconstruction • Mistag rate for ET=50 GeV: • Tight: 0.5% (=43%) • Loose: 2% (=50%) • Depending on physics analyses: • Choose “tight” or “loose” tagging algorithm “positive” tag “negative” tag

  43. The Top Signal: Lepton + Jets b-jets s(tt) =  8.3+0.6-0.5(stat) ± 1.1 (syst) pb • Select: • 1 electron or muon • Large missing ET • 1 or 2 b-tagged jets jets lepton missing ET double-tagged events, nearly no background Top Signal Check backgrounds

  44. Data and Monte Carlo Comparison W-jet pT b-jet pT ttbar pT Mttbar

  45. The Top Signal: Dilepton b-jets • Select: • 2 leptons: ee, e,  • Large missing ET • 2 jets (with or w/o b-tag) leptons missing ET w/o b-tag with b-tag  = 6.2 ± 0.9 (stat) ± 0.9 (sys) pb

  46. The Top Cross Section • Tevatron • Measured using many different techniques • Good agreement • between all measurements • between data and theory • Precision: ~13% • LHC: • Cross section ~100 times larger • Measurement will be one of the first milestones (already with 10 pb-1) • Test prediction • demonstrate good understanding of detector • Expected precision • ~4% with 100 pb-1

  47. Top at LHC: very clean • At √s=7 TeV: • About 200 pb-1 surpass Tevatron top sample statistics • About 20 pb-1 needed for “rediscovery”

  48. Conclusions • Hadron collisions are complex. • Cross sections determined by parton distribution functions • Strong rise of gluon towards low x • Many soft particles unrelated to hard scatter • Use transverse momentum (pT) as major discriminant • Perturbative QCD describes hadron collider data successfully: • Jet cross sections: / ≈ 20-100% • W/Z cross section: / ≈ 6% • Top cross section: / ≈ 15%

  49. Precision Measurement of Electroweak Sector of the Standard Model • W boson mass • Top quark mass • Implications for the Higgs boson

  50. The W boson, the top quark and the Higgs boson SM broken SM okay • Top quark is the heaviest known fundamental particle • Today: mtop=173.1+-1.3 GeV • Run 1: mtop=178+-4.3 GeV/c2 • Is this large mass telling us something about electroweak symmetry breaking? • Top yukawa coupling: • <H>/(√2 mtop) = 1.005 ± 0.008 • Masses related through radiative corrections: • mW~Mtop2 • mW~ln(mH) • If there are new particles the relation might change: • Precision measurement of top quark and W boson mass can reveal new physics

More Related