1 / 13

Delaware Alignment 619 Outcome System

Delaware Alignment 619 Outcome System. Jim J. Lesko, Ed.D. Delaware Department of Education jlesko@doe.k12.de.us. Instruction/Intervention. Instructional Planning. Developmental Data. Ongoing Assessment. Delaware Building Blocks Framework. Instruction/Intervention.

yamal
Download Presentation

Delaware Alignment 619 Outcome System

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Delaware Alignment619 Outcome System Jim J. Lesko, Ed.D. Delaware Department of Education jlesko@doe.k12.de.us

  2. Instruction/Intervention Instructional Planning Developmental Data Ongoing Assessment Delaware Building Blocks Framework

  3. Instruction/Intervention Instructional Planning Early Learning Guidelines Developmental Data Ongoing Assessment Delaware Building Blocks Alignment Framework

  4. Multiple Step Process • Align Early Learning Guidelines with the 3 OSEP Outcomes • Identified Dominant Measures in use in Delaware – then added a few other well known measures • Assembled a group of Master Educators/Interventionists

  5. “Master” group examined alignments of measurement tool items with the guidelines • Measuring what one is Teaching • “Master” group in pairs and independently identified alignment – or lack of • “Master” pairs met and came to consensus on items

  6. Examine the percentage of alignment of individual measures • Piloted use of the measures with the highest level of alignment over a six month period • Had assessors keep reflective logs, met periodically, surveyed • Chose from the measures piloted and subsequently developed a list of state recommended measures

  7. Vineland I/T (74%) 1 – 89% PreK (54%) 1 – 70% 2 – 63% 2 – 25% 3 – 69% 3 – 67% Brigance I/T (86%) 1 – 84% PreK (53%) 1 – 50% 2 – 83% 2 – 67% 3 – 92% 3 – 44% Desired Results I/T (87%) 1 – 94% PreK (74%) 1 – 70% 2 – 87% 2 – 75% 3 – 81% 3 – 78% Aligning Child Outcome Measurement

  8. Early LAP I/T (76%) 1 – 79% 2 – 73% 3 – 77% AEPS I/T (64%) 1 – 63% 2 – 63% 3 – 65% OUNCE I/T (77%) 1 – 74% 2 – 80% 3 – 77% Carolina Infants I/T (78%) 1 – 89% 2 – 70% 3 – 77%

  9. ABAS I/T PreK (83%) 1 – 90% 2 – 60% 3 – 100% LAP -3 PreK (66%) 1 – 70% 2 – 71% 3 – 56% Carolina Preschool PreK (65%) 1 – 80% 2 – 71% 3 – 44%

  10. Work Sampling Alignment

  11. Aligning Child Outcome Measurement

  12. Aligning Child Outcome Measurement

More Related