1 / 20

Lecture by Jens Plahte, cand. philol.,

Considerations of public health and commercialism in the Cuban biotech sector and vaccine industry. Lecture by Jens Plahte, cand. philol.,. Research Fellow, Centre for Technology, Innovation and Culture University of Oslo. Visiting Researcher, Centre for Health and Welfare Studies

yale
Download Presentation

Lecture by Jens Plahte, cand. philol.,

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Considerations of public health and commercialism in the Cuban biotech sector and vaccine industry. Lecture by Jens Plahte, cand. philol., Research Fellow,Centre for Technology, Innovation and Culture University of Oslo Visiting Researcher,Centre for Health and Welfare Studies University of Havana First Annual Latin America Research Conference:Contributing to a better future? The role of Norway based Latin America research Oslo, 12–13 November 2009 jens.plahte@tik.uio.no

  2. Outline of presentation • Doctoral dissertation • The Cuban biotech sector and vaccine industry • Two paradoxes

  3. Ph.D. dissertation • “Vaccine innovation for public health or profits – The Cuban vaccine industry in a national and global context ” • Funded by the Research Council of Norway • Papers: • A decision centered vaccine innovation model (with Lisbeth Meyer Næss, NIPH) • Tiered prices of vaccines: not a subsidy, but a win-win-win situation (Lancet Inf Dis 5(1), 2005) • The pneumococcal vaccine Advance Market Commitment may create a market, but seems to fail as ‘market-pull’ • Strategic evaluations and techno-economic networks. Vaccine innovation in the Cuban biotech sector: for public health – or profits? • Development, organization and management of techno-economic networks: the Cuban biotech sector and vaccine industry

  4. The Cuban biotech sector • An industrial district of western Havana • ≈ 20 000 workers • ≈ 10 research and production centres • Biopharmaceuticals are the second most important foreign currency earner of Cuba • Diagnostics, therapeutics, vaccines • Massive investments since 1981 • Long term focus on science, education and health since 1959

  5. The Cuban vaccine industry • Main centres • Centro de Ingeniería Genética y Biotechnología • Centro de Inmunología Molecular • Instituto Finlay • Main products • Meningococcal group B vaccine • Hepatitis B vaccine (hepB) • Haemophilus B vaccine (HiB), synthetic • Pentavalent DTP-HiB-hepB • Vaccines are important in the total biotech product portfolio

  6. Two paradoxes The initial rationale of the biotech initiative was to target ’modern’ diseases (cancer, cardiov. and cong. dis.) … but … … vaccines target ’traditional’ infectious diseases High priorities of the Castro Government are public health, medical diplomacy, as well as export revenues generation … but … … Cuban vaccines are not sold on the global public sector markets Why?

  7. Strategic and techno-economic evaluations Health transition required ’modern’ measures (products) Adapted from Callon (1992)

  8. Economic revenues as rationale: Two sides of the same coin Financedomestic supply by commercialexports Usedomesticsupplies to legitimatecreating an exportorientedsector

  9. Late 1970s: Morbidity and mortality transition • Interventions: • Immunization • Sanitation • Primary health care • Essential drugs • Secondary and tertiary health care • Prenatal diagnosis • Advanced biopharmaceuticals Patterns: Traditional • Infectious diseases • Malnutrition • Neonatal and maternal mortality Modern • Cardiovascular conditions • Congenital disorders • Cancer Depletion of traditional measures  Need for modern measures

  10. The meningococcal epidemic 1976-91 • National emergency • No vaccine available • Domestic vaccine innovation project 1983  • Group B meningococal disease eliminated in 1991 • Finlay Institute founded in 1991 • Vaccine innovation capabilities • Based on traditional bacteria fermentation technologies

  11. Endemic hepatitis B • Recombinant vaccine developed by Merck in 1986 • Creation of a platform technology: Yeast based expression system • CIGB founded in 1986 • Vaccine innovation capabilities • Based on single cell organism recombinant technologies • Cuban recombinant hepatitis B vaccine licensed in 1992

  12. Altered strategic evaluations Vaccine innovation capabilities were developed • National meningococcal epidemic • Endemic hepatitis B • Platform technology development, technological window of opportunity  Vaccine innovation became important because capabilities had been developed

  13. Strategic and techno-economic evaluations Health transition required ’modern’ measures (products) Strategic evaluations were altered (menB and hepB vaccines) Established capabilities facilitated further vaccine innovation Adapted from Callon (1992)

  14. Two paradoxes The initial rationale of the biotech initiative was to target ’modern’ diseases (cancer, cardiov. and cong. dis.) … but … … vaccines target ’traditional’ infectious diseases The Castro Government has public health and medical diplomacy as a high priority, as well as a commercial motivation … but … … Cuban vaccines are not sold on the global public sector markets

  15. Markets for Cuban vaccines Middle income countries: Argentina, Venezuela, China, Russia, South Africa, South Korea Global public sector markets • Least developed countries in Africa, Asia and Latin-America • Procurement services by UNICEF and PAHO

  16. Price discrimination Plahte 2005, Lancet Inf. Dis., Vol. 5, No. 1: Tiered prices of vaccines: not a subsidy, but a win-win-win situation Single market High price market Low price market

  17. The Cuban health system • Top national priority (with education and science) • Medical diplomacy: Medicine as an instrument of foreign policies • Foreign currency generation by exportation • of medical services • of biopharmaceuticals

  18. Possible explanations • The Cubans are unaware of the price discrimination mechanism???? • Political considerations???? • Lack of commercial motivation????? • Cost ???? • Embargo raises production costs Explanation: Philanthropy sometimes requires a competitive edge!

  19. Conclusions 1) Despite the transition towards ’modern’ public health challenges, ’traditional’ products became important. One important reason is that vaccine innovation capabilities were established because • a national emergency had to be countered • of the need and opportunity for technology platform creation Once established, these capabilities opened windows of opportunity for further vaccine innovation

  20. Conclusions 2) Despite it being profitable to do so, … and despite its focus on public health and medical diplomacy, … and despite being a self declared socialist state, … Cuba does not sells vaccines on the global public sector markets Most probable reason: Uncompetitive production costs

More Related