further higher better
Download
Skip this Video
Download Presentation
Further, Higher, Better?

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 14

Further, Higher, Better? - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 78 Views
  • Uploaded on

Further, Higher, Better?. Gareth Parry University of Sheffield. Why divide, and does it matter?. a long-standing feature? an English peculiarity? an issue for public policy?. Some policy history. 1944: an FE system + the universities 1966: colleges-polytechnics + the universities

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about ' Further, Higher, Better?' - xyla-thomas


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
further higher better

Further, Higher, Better?

Gareth Parry

University of Sheffield

why divide and does it matter
Why divide, and does it matter?
  • a long-standing feature?
  • an English peculiarity?
  • an issue for public policy?
some policy history
Some policy history ...

1944: an FE system + the universities

1966: colleges-polytechnics + the universities

1988: FE + polytechnics + the universities

1992: FE + HE

2000: L&S + HE

staying with sectors
Staying with sectors ...

Policy silence, except for:

  • the uniqueness of HE
  • the disorder of post-16
from elite to mass the fe contribution
From elite to mass: the FE contribution
  • England: a ‘qualifying’ rather than ‘providing’ role for FE
  • Scotland: a leading role for FE in taking HE expansion
from mass to near universal access the fe contribution
From mass to near-universal access: the FE contribution
  • England: breaking the traditional pattern of demand, with dual sectors (‘the English experiment’)
  • Scotland: holding at 50%, with tertiary arrangements
contemporary configurations of fe and he
Contemporary configurations of FE and HE
  • mixed economy colleges
  • dual-sector universities
  • cross-sector partnerships
dual sector universities
Dual-sector universities

FE:HE

TVU 60:40

Leeds Metropolitan University 45:55

University of the Arts 50:50

University of Derby 40:60

Writtle College 90:10

Birmingham CFTCS 80:20

semi compulsory partnerships
Semi-compulsory partnerships
  • for validation
  • for (indirect) funding
  • for (increasing & widening) participation
  • for (vocational) progression: Lifelong Learning Networks, with additional funded numbers
so do sectors matter
So, do sectors matter?
  • no restraint on partnerships
  • functional for some
  • a check on mission drift?

but:

  • asymmetries of policy and power
  • ‘double stratification’: social & institutional
  • a common enterprise?
after 2010
After 2010?
  • spending review
  • fee deregulation
  • demographic downturn
the esrc furtherhigher project
The ESRC FurtherHigher Project

Why do the English divide?

With what effect on organisations?

With what impact on participation and equity?

[email protected]

ad