Technology and the “New Normal” at Winona State University Thriving in a world of continuous change Technology Fee Presentation. Student Fee Management Committee – 2014. Overview of Presentation. ITS Organizational Structure Governance Planning Funding for IT @ WSU
Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.
Dean Feller, Director
Robin Honken, Director
David Gresham, Director
Ken Graetz, Director
New Technology MasterPlan Approved in Spring 2013Runs from July 2013 – June 2016
Year End UniversityReport
Technology Master Plan
(Goals and Objectives)
Evidence that Core Components are met
Component 2C: The organization’s ongoing evaluation and assessment processes provide reliable evidence on institutional effectiveness that clearly informs strategies for continuous improvement.
The team observed that the assessment processes with regard to non-academic units are well planned and quite robust. Feedback loops are part of each plan with decisions made, based on results of assessment. For example, the campus technology plan includes a data collection plan, sets measureable goals, and defines metrics for goal achievement. The team viewed this plan as quite impressive and a model for other units within the institution and elsewhere.
* Represents nearly 90% of the IT budget
New 3-Year Wireless Plan
(FY13 – FY15)
Support academic transformation in several critical, new learning spaces.
(General Classrooms, Nursing & Business)