1 / 12

A.Jeremie, C.Hauviller

FP7 LED Potential program to develop inertial sensors Explore potential to achieve 0.1nm stability scale for the FD above a few Herz. A.Jeremie, C.Hauviller. 2) Potential programme to develop inertial sensors. (Claude+Andrea) : State of the art.

xiu
Download Presentation

A.Jeremie, C.Hauviller

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. FP7 LEDPotential program to develop inertial sensorsExplore potential to achieve 0.1nm stability scale for the FD above a few Herz A.Jeremie, C.Hauviller

  2. 2) Potential programme to develop inertial sensors. (Claude+Andrea) : • State of the art. • b) Current limitations that need to be addressed to achieve 1nm above 1Hz and 0.1nm above 5Hz. • c) Potential means to overcome these limitations. • d) A rough idea of a potential schedule. It would be useful to keep in mind that we would like to use the sensors in the project. • e) Resources needs and availability. • 4) Potential programme to develop the software for the design of the module and to control the feedback. (Andrea)

  3. State of the art inertial sensors • NI PCI-6052 Multifunction DAQ Fast card Low noise card • Compatible Matlab/Simulink (Softwares used for the algorithm) nm stabilisation equipment exists

  4. State of the art inertial sensors Free-fixed configuration close to the detector Feedback output: Actuator at the fixed-part of the beam

  5. TMC Isolator • « Passive » rubber: - Enhance the perturbation around a given frequency fc - Damp perturbations above fc Transfer function for passive material fc frequency • « Active » :- Active isolation in the frequency range enhanced by the passive material =>start building a prototype combining Passive and Active isolation

  6. Introduction High frequency sensor VE13 Low frequency sensors SP500 sensors from EENTEC • 0.0167 to 75 Hz • Non magnetic • 20KV/(m/s)very sensitive!! 1 Tesla testing • Electrochemical motion sensor • Special electrolytic solution • Four platinum mesh electrodes ( 2 anodes and 2 cathodes ) • An external acceleration creates a differential pressure across the channel and forces the liquid to move with velocity V. Ions move to the electrodes . PMD scientific has promised to send us 2 prototypes; conditions not yet finalised => work together on sensor development

  7. SLAC sensor development with Joe Frisch Spring Cantilever • BeCu spring (high tensile strength, non magnetic): Pre-bent; Simulation of creep fluctuations indicate <1 nm noise • Thermal effects very large!! ~10-8 C corresponds to (0.1Hz) noise limit • Eddy currents from variations in solenoid field produce non-negligible eddy current forces on these conductors RF Out RF IN Electrodes, Test Mass

  8. Inertial Sensor Development • Develop in lab a new sensor as SLAC did: not us! We don’t have the necessary resources for that at LAPP! • Would need an electrical/instrumentation engineer for that • Keep an eye on commercial developments and contact companies: • -sensors: PMD scientific, PCB scientific • -actuators: Cedrat and PI • =>Milestones: over the whole period of program • =>Human resources: PhD? for 3 years plus supervisor (50%?) • =>Financial resources: 2 sensors/year: between 4000-20000 euros each • actuators: 1000 euros each

  9. FD stability Things we don’t know: What is the FD configuration? Saclay? Is it normal or superconducting? (M.Aleksa’s work: Sm2Co17) How close to detector? MDI issues=> free-fixed or fixed-fixed configuration? What is needed for CTF3 test: in preliminary proposal text it is said that a mechanical equivalent could be used…FD issues not for CTF3? Needed for a test: -FD (real or mock) -support (what configuration?) -sensors/actuators -feedback loop (see next presentation)

  10. Reflections on FD stability for ATF2 (B.Bolzon): • Beam repetition rate: 1Hz at beginning=>beam-based feedback 0-0.1Hz (at best!) • CLIC Stacis 2000 table works best between 1-50Hz=> even amplifies vibrations below 1Hz! • Rigid mount preferred to have coherent movement with Beam-shape Monitor (Shintake) • CLIC Stacis 2000 block in free floating configuration (250Hz), but in fixed configuration (60Hz). Still OK.

  11. R.Amirikas, A.Bertolini LHC Low ß Quadrupole Effect of the support foundation Vessel socket vs jack base • the transverse mode structure already visible at the interface between the jack and the concrete pad, but not in the floor • the enlarged contact surface produces significant benefits on the dynamic stability of the module Vessel socket vs floor the results of the measurements on this short quadrupole cryostat look promising for the use of the alignment jacks for the ILC linacs, after suitable modifications

  12. Resources needed Human resources: Mechanical engineer for design of support from Europe: 36 months Machine shop: 6 months Automatics engineer (see next presentation) Sensor and actuator, MDI study: PhD? together with module support? Material resources: dedicated sensors: between 4000-20000 euros each actuators: 1000 euros each material for support construction: 10000 euros Milestones: the two-beam scheme being the main subject to demonstrate for 2009/2010, the FD stability can go over the 5 years of the program. =>construction of test stand until 2009 with specifications well understood =>tests during 2009/2010

More Related