1 / 15

Mindblind Eyes: An Absence of Spontaneous Theory of Mind in Asperger Syndrome

Sean Kim Ariel Strayer. Mindblind Eyes: An Absence of Spontaneous Theory of Mind in Asperger Syndrome. Introduction. Individuals with autism: Have impairments in social interaction and communication

xena
Download Presentation

Mindblind Eyes: An Absence of Spontaneous Theory of Mind in Asperger Syndrome

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Sean Kim Ariel Strayer Mindblind Eyes:An Absence of Spontaneous Theory of Mind in Asperger Syndrome

  2. Introduction • Individuals with autism: • Have impairments in social interaction and communication • Are unable to mentalize aka a deficit in theory of mind (ToM). This is known as the mindblindness hypothesis. • Mentalize– The automatic ability to attribute mental states to the self and others • Fail the verbally instructed Sally-Anne false-belief task (FBT)

  3. Introduction • Asperger Syndrome (AS): • Autism spectrum disorder • Better cognitive and linguistic abilities • Can pass the Sally-Anne FBT • Throws wrench in the mindblindness hypothesis

  4. Study Aim • To provide direct evidence by contrasting the ability to pass the standard FBT with spontaneous looking behavior during a nonverbal form of this task

  5. Research Question • Will adults with Asperger syndrome, through their anticipatory looking, reveal a spontaneous capacity for false-belief attribution?

  6. Subjects • 19 Asperger’s participants • 17 neurotypical participants • Matched by age and IQ • Participants were recruited through the autism research database at the UCL Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience

  7. Methods • Subjects completed various theory of mind tasks • Five first-order false-belief tests • Interpret another person’s behavior • Two second-order false-belief tests • Understand another’s emotion based on the false belief of a protagonist

  8. Methods • Answers were marked as Pass/Fail (1/0) for each task • Additionally, subjects were asked to justify their choice • 1 pt.: Correct mental state justification • e.g. “Because she doesn’t know it’s in the box.” • .5 pt.: Correct non-mental state justification • e.g. “Because she left it in the basket.” • 0 pts.: Incorrect justification • e.g. “Because no-one stole it apart from Anne.”

  9. Methods • The study focused on nonverbal false-belief tasks (FBT) • Subject’s eye gaze was tracked during a variation of the classic Sally-Anne FBT • Let’s go to the video!

  10. Results

  11. Results

  12. Summary of Results • Subjects with Asperger syndrome and neurotypical adults showed no differences in age, IQ, and the verbal ToM tasks. • For the nonverbal, eye-tracking FBT, participants with Asperger’s showed significantly less looking bias toward the correct window. • The Asperger subjects made fewer correct first eye movements (saccades). • Participants with Asperger syndrome fixated for shorter durations on the actor’s face than neurotypical adults.

  13. Discussion • Adults with Asperger syndrome do not spontaneously anticipate others’ actions in a nonverbal task • Asperger group exhibited correct anticipatory looking on familiarization trials when no belief reasoning was required • Is this an accurate method for measuring theory of mind?

  14. Reference • Senju, A., Southgate, V., White, S., & Frith, U. (July 16, 2009). Mindblind eyes: An absence of spontaneous theory of mind in Asperger syndrome. Science, 325, 883-885.

More Related