1 / 6

Norbert Kiss Hétfa Research Institute Corvinus University of Budapest 25th April, 2013

Evaluation of Health Care Development Projects in Hungary: The Case of Lifestyle Development Programmes. Norbert Kiss Hétfa Research Institute Corvinus University of Budapest 25th April, 2013. Lifestyle development programmes in 2009: overview of applications.

xarles
Download Presentation

Norbert Kiss Hétfa Research Institute Corvinus University of Budapest 25th April, 2013

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Evaluation of Health Care Development Projects in Hungary:The Case of Lifestyle Development Programmes Norbert KissHétfa Research Institute Corvinus University of Budapest25th April, 2013

  2. Lifestyle development programmes in 2009: overview of applications • App. 250.000 participants (SMIS-monitoring) Source: SMIS-reporting (10th Jan 2013) Evaluation of Health Care Development Projects in Hungary:The Case of Lifestyle Development Programmes

  3. Geographic targeting of the lifestyle development projects Evaluation of Health Care Development Projects in Hungary:The Case of Lifestyle Development Programmes

  4. Adequateness of content and impact of lifestyle development projects • Motivation for individual and/or community level lifestyle changes were in the focus • Capacity building, changes in the local environment to promote healthy lifestyle were given lower priority • Difficulties with identifying and following the real professional content of the projects – assessing whether the content has met the needs is also difficult • Quality assurance of the professional content was missing from the selection procedure (except for LAMR applications) • Non-LAMR health plans were often only formally adequate • Recommendations and resources of the (central) research and methodological development institutions were rarely used • „Copy-paste” type content was typical in communication materials • Long lasting impacts are not achievable (according to expert opinions) • Low value of grants – high administrative burden Evaluation of Health Care Development Projects in Hungary:The Case of Lifestyle Development Programmes

  5. Contribution to improvement of local conditions • Not clearly demostrated how the health plans are connected to the local needs and demands • Health plans, prepared during the projects, have not become a central part of local health development planning • Methodological support was provided for LAMRs • Inclusion of partners: mostly from the social sector • Partnership agreements were typically made for the duration of the projects • Occasionally „simple and inexpensive” solutions were less preferred („this is the time when we have the money…”) • Equal opportunity appeared as a horizontal objective • The practice of „one size fits all” was strong • A large part of the experiences have been incorporated into the newer calls in 2011-2012 Evaluation of Health Care Development Projects in Hungary:The Case of Lifestyle Development Programmes

  6. Thank you for your attention!

More Related