1 / 12

WP 5 Botanical Community Content Provision , Metadata Catalogue and Quality Control

WP 5 Botanical Community Content Provision , Metadata Catalogue and Quality Control. Matúš Kempa. Institute of Botany of Slovak Academy of Sciences. Work package 5. Lead : Institute of Botany of Slovak Academy of Sciences (IBSAS), Bratislava Members :

wylie
Download Presentation

WP 5 Botanical Community Content Provision , Metadata Catalogue and Quality Control

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. WP 5BotanicalCommunityContentProvision, MetadataCatalogue and QualityControl MatúšKempa Institute ofBotanyofSlovakAcademyofSciences

  2. Workpackage 5 Lead: • InstituteofBotanyof Slovak AcademyofSciences (IBSAS), Bratislava Members: • FUB-BGBM, IBSAS, NHM, NHMW, NM, ETI, UCPH, RBGE, UH, RBGK, NCBN, NBGB, UT-NHM, LandOOE Content: • Botanical specimen images, photographsandscansoflivingplants, naturalhistoryartworkscans

  3. ObjectivesforYear 2 MS10 – Localprovider software and metadatamappingfunctionalforallbotanicalcontentdata • D5.2.0 – Local botanical provider software andmetadata mapping functional for allcontent data sources [M18] • C5.3.1 Operational content provision (botany), first report (D13) [M18] • C5.4.1Dataqualitycheckfeedback (botany)

  4. D5.2.0 Local botanical provider software andmetadata mapping functional for allcontent data sources (withcoop. of WP4, WP7) 14 of14botanicaldataprovidersconnected 36 botanicaldatasources Mapping • BioCASE Monitor Tool 1.4 (FranckTheeten)

  5. Most commonmappingerrors Missingmandatoryelements • License URI Multipledatasourceswith single unit • DataSourceforeachUnit • Institution‘smetadata table joinedwithunitstable • HeaderforeachUnit -> unnecessaryoverhead

  6. C5.3.1 Operational content provision, first report (botany) [M18] Providers‘ cooperation • Descriptionofinstitution, content, optionalinformationbeingprovided 13 of 14 partners are providingbotanicalcontent + 1 new (MNHN) 940,000 botanicalobjectsavailable - BioCASE (March 2013) • 891,600 herbariumobjects • 6600 drawings • 40800 photographs More than 750,000 in Europeana

  7. C5.4.1 Dataqualitycheckfeedback SurveyMonkeyquestionaire (Jana Hoffmann) Metadata, objects Metadatalevel: source • Namesunification – checklist • Spellingerrors • DataQualityToolkit • Providers‘ feedback

  8. C5.4.1 feedback Herbariumlabels • Specializedstaff, specializedvolunteers • Originalinformation, erroraddressing Specimenidentification • Namevalidity, homonyms • IPNI, Tropicos, CatalogueofLife Authors, collectors • names web-services, paper copy of literature, online literature, collectors databases Enhancinggeo-references, coordinatesaccuracy, typescheck Mediumeffort

  9. C5.4.1 Metadatalevel: mapping • Requiredfields and theircontent • Communicationbetweenprovider, coordinator, helpdesk • BioCASE Monitor Tool Metadatalevel: transformation • ABCD to ESE • WP 2

  10. C5.4.1 objects JSTOR Plantshandbookpractice • Uniquebarcode on specimensheet • Visiblemeasurementscale • Colortarget

  11. WP 5 - Year 3 C5.3.2Operationalcontentprovision (botany), review and second report [M28] C5.4.2Dataqualitycheckfeedback (botany) [M28] C5.3.3Sustainablecontentprovision (botany), third report and outlook [M35] C5.4.3Dataqualitycheckfeedback (botany) [M35]

  12. Thankyou!

More Related