GEZI
Download
1 / 15

Ilgın Külekçi Adrian De Miguel Simon Lura Cuccu Simon Tirkel Ece Üstün - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 150 Views
  • Uploaded on

GEZI AS A GIFT AS A PARK [ Remapping Istanbul ]. Ilgın Külekçi Adrian De Miguel Simon Lura Cuccu Simon Tirkel Ece Üstün. PARK as a natural gift. 1. naturally

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about ' Ilgın Külekçi Adrian De Miguel Simon Lura Cuccu Simon Tirkel Ece Üstün' - wyatt


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript

GEZI AS A GIFT

AS A PARK

[Remapping Istanbul]

Ilgın Külekçi

Adrian De Miguel Simon

Lura Cuccu

Simon Tirkel

Ece Üstün


PARK as a naturalgift

1. naturally

A park in a crowded city could be seen as a natural gift. It creates a common green area which allows citizens to enjoy the weather without getting out of the city.  With its spaciousness and wideness,  it offers free space to move, to sit, to relax and to spend more time outside. It can also be considered as a combination of free space and free time.


PARK as a politicalgift

2. socially&politically

Thereconstructionprojectwhich is presented as a hugegiftandhard work. Socialandpoliticalcontroloverthiscommonareatriedtoconvertthe park into a commercialcenter: to a designed/controlled/walledshoppingcenter.


PARK as GEZİ

The reconstruction project is not welcomed. And it is rejected by citizens. After anoccupyto Gezi Park, the government reevaluated the whole area of Taksim, and made a new distribution of power control. After taking-back Gezi Park from the chapullers, the municipality closed it and opened with its new decorated style after 23 days. But it is taken back in a few hours, and then reopened. The opening and closing deal continued according to citizens’ attitudes and new events. So the citizens should be proper to merit Gezi Park.


PARK as GEZİ

Gezi Park createsitsborderswithpolicemenjustwherethegreenarea is completed, andtheopeningandclosingwarning is set bythepublictension, anddecidedbygovernment.


GEZİ as a PARK

in ISTANBUL

In Istanbul most of the parks were gardens of several palaces. They were offered to citizens by sultans or by municipality and became public areas. But because of their architectural properties as a part of a palace, they have walls and doors. So they can be shut down and opened.


Theycould not be integrated directlywithin the city and they are not natural extensions of the urban life, since they are not designed as urban parks. Gezi Park and Maçka Park are designed parks but they also have walls and doors


GEZİ as a PARK

openingandclosing


Area surrounding t axim and ma ka park
Area surrounding Taximand Maçka Park



Taxim square gezi park
Taxim SquareGezi Park


C onceptual analysis of the area
Conceptualanalysis of the area


GEZİ and MACKA PARK topographicalobstacles


GEZİ and MACKA PARK topographicalobstacles

Maçka Park has its frontiers through the route, and a decorated entrance. The topographical character might also obstruct the daily usage.


In conclusion, we can question

what people deserve for free in a city

and the consummation and the assessment of the ‘urban gift’

and the power control of the gift owner

-reformulating by adorning and offering as improvements

-the function change of several places in Taksim: re-taking the public places: Taşkışla, AKM, Gümüşsuyu, İnönü Stadium

-new projections


ad