- 97 Views
- Uploaded on
- Presentation posted in: General

AGEC 608: Lecture 7

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

- Objective: Discuss methods for dealing with uncertainty in the context of a benefit-cost analysis
- Readings:
- Boardman, Chapter 7

- Homework #2: Chapter 3, problem 1Chapter 3, problem 2Chapter 4, problem 3due: next class
- Homework #3: Chapter 4, problem 2Chapter 5, problem 1Chapter 6, problem 4due: March 27

- Hint for Chapter 4, question 3b
- Net benefits =
Change in consumer surplus

+ after tax change in producer surplus

+ net gain to taxpayers (lower tax)

+ net gain to taxpayers x METB (less DWL)

Tax payers enjoy a reduction in tax payments and the reduction in tax payments also leads to a reduction in deadweight loss

Three methods for dealing with uncertainty

1. Expected value analysis

assign probability weights to contingencies

2. Sensitivity analysis

vary assumptions and examine outcomes

3. Value new informationfind the value of information as it applies to the uncertainty under consideration

1. Expected value analysis

Goal: imagine a set of exhaustive and mutually exclusive outcomes, determine their relative likelihoods, and compute the probability-weighted value of benefits and costs.

Contingencies (scenarios) should represent all possible outcomes between extremes.

1. Expected value analysis

pi = probability of event i occurring (0 ≤pi ≤ 1)

Bi = benefit if event i occurs

Ci = cost if event i occurs

1. Expected value analysis

Example: rainfall and irrigation with three outcomes

prob(low) = ¼ NB(low) = 4.5

prob(normal) = ½NB(normal)= 0.6

prob(high) = ¼NB(high)= 0.0

E[NB] = 0.25*4.5 + 0.50*0.6 + 0.25*0.0 = 1.425

1. Expected value analysis

If the relationship between outcomes and the underlying uncertainty is linear, and if outcomes are equally likely, then only two events are required to obtain an accurate estimate.

But in general, the less uniform the probabilities, and the more variant the net benefits, the more important sensitivity analysis will be to obtaining an accurate picture of expected outcomes.

1. Expected value analysis

What if the project is long-lived?

If risks are independent, then the E[NB] approach can be applied directly.

If risks are not independent, then some advanced form of decision analysis is required (Bayesian inference, dynamic programming, etc.).

1. Expected value analysis

Example: decision tree analysis for a vaccination program

Initial decision: trunk

Final outcomes: branches

Backward solution, with pruning.

2. Sensitivity analysis

Goal: study how outcomes change when we change underlying assumptions.

“Complete” sensitivity analysis is typically impossible.

Three main approaches:

partial sensitivity analysis worst-case and best-case analysis

Monte Carlo simulation

2. Sensitivity analysis

Partial sensitivity analysis

choose an important assumption in the model and find the “break even” value for the parameter of interest.

At what value of “x” would the project be worthwhile?

Practical problem: how can you determine what is important (and therefore crucial for sensitivity analysis) before doing the sensitivity analysis!

2. Sensitivity analysis

Worst-case and best-case analysis

Study outcomes associated with extreme assumptions.

If net benefits are a non-linear function of a parameter, then care may be required.

It often may be necessary to examine combinations of parameters.

2. Sensitivity analysis

Monte Carlo simulation

Goal: use as much information as available.

Three steps:

1. specify full probability distributions for key parameters2. randomly draw from distributions and compute NB

3. repeat to generate a distribution of NB.

3. Value new information

Goal: find out if it is beneficial to delay a decision in order to use information that may become available in the future.

Especially important if decisions are irreversible(quasi-option value)

Example: irreversible development of a wilderness area.