1 / 23

Yale’s New eProcurement Solution Feedback Session

Yale’s New eProcurement Solution Feedback Session. Pilot Group Representatives September 7, 2004. Agenda. Introduction 1:30-1:45 Demonstration of Solution 1:45-2:15 Issues Discussion 2:15-3:30 Additional Q&A (if needed) 3:30-4:30. Who is here?. Representatives from the Pilot group

woody
Download Presentation

Yale’s New eProcurement Solution Feedback Session

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Yale’s New eProcurement SolutionFeedback Session Pilot Group Representatives September 7, 2004

  2. Agenda • Introduction 1:30-1:45 • Demonstration of Solution 1:45-2:15 • Issues Discussion 2:15-3:30 • Additional Q&A (if needed) 3:30-4:30

  3. Who is here? • Representatives from the Pilot group • Medical School • Central Campus • Business Office Staff • Lab Personnel • Project Management Team

  4. Why you are here? • Major Buy/Pay Improvement Initiative • Pilot Group was chosen, based on: • Nominees from the DUCs group • Volume of your department’s transactions through Phase 1 suppliers • We need your feedback on some issues

  5. What are the benefits of this solution? • Benefits to the User/Lab Community: • buy from multiple suppliers at once • reduces the need for cost transfers • single log in and interface for all hosted contract supplier catalogs (~100 suppliers, to be rolled out in waves) • easy electronic requisition order form that is pre-populated with your profile information (ship to, charging instructions, etc.) • convenient shopping 24 hours a day • excellent deal combining price, quality and service • provides up-to-date catalog information • create efficient express orders using Favorites • cross-supplier searches in catalogs to find best price • faster turn-around time for orders and payments to suppliers • accounting commitment created in Oracle financials (i.e. to track real-time spend against a grant) • easy split charging when required

  6. What are the benefits of this solution? • Benefits to the University: • improves management and planning capacity • greater institutional costs savings by aggregating and leveraging University-wide transaction volume • faster turn-around time for orders and payments to suppliers • improves quality of service to Yale community and simplifies and streamlines the Buy Pay Process

  7. What are the benefits of this solution? • Benefits to the Business Office: • review, routing and approval • accounting commitment created in Oracle financials (i.e. to track real-time spend against a grant) • easy split charging when required • upfront collection and validation of charging instructions (eliminates back-end handling of error invoices) • eliminates the handling of paper requisitions and paper invoices • reduces the need for cost transfers

  8. Project Information • eProcurement Solution is SciQuest • Specializes in large research institutions • Go live, with Pilot group, 3rd QTR FY05 • Phase 1: ~20-30 supplier catalogs • Phase 2: ~60-70 additional catalogs • 3 ways to requisition in the solution • Shop in catalogs • Non-catalog request for existing supplier • Non-catalog request for new supplier

  9. Demonstration

  10. Issues Discussion • Topic #1: See Supplier List • Are there any suppliers you use most often that are not on this list?

  11. Issues Discussion • Topic #2: Charging Instructions • Validation and Expenditure Item Date • Use of pre-awards • Valid Tasks for a Project, but no description for the “Task” • Use of VIP’s • Expenditure type default for VIP • The way they appear in the solution

  12. Issues Discussion • Topic #3: Frequency of Order Changes and Cancellations • How often do you change or cancel an order after you place it?

  13. Issues Discussion • Topic #4: Training Options • Classroom • Web-based, on demand • Train the trainer • No training

  14. Issues Discussion • Topic #5: User profile information • START for access and default profile information • Default Ship to addresses • Default approver name

  15. Issues Discussion • Topic #6: Department Views • What view of transactions do you need? (i.e. Division, Department or Organization level) • Who needs which level?

  16. Issues Discussion • Topic #7: Workflow Approval Thresholds • What kind of transaction approval do you require? (just Business Office or Lab Managers as well?)

  17. Approval Workflow $ Limit Requirements Requisitioner’s $ Limits: Example $ limits and definitions: • $0 - Everything needs approval • <=$ 500 requisition does not require approval • <=$1000 requisition does not require approval • <=$2000 requisition does not require approval • <=$5000 requisition does not require approval Approver’s $ Limits: Example $ limits and definitions: • Business Office Staff person #1- Can approve to $10,000 • Business Office Staff person #2- Can approve to $25,000 • Business Manager- Can approve to $100,000 • Department Chair/Dean – notification of large $ orders

  18. Statistics on current transaction volume • UNP VIP Transactions FY 2004:

  19. Statistics on current transaction volume (cont’d) • PCard Transactions FY 2004:

  20. Statistics on current transaction volume (cont’d) • Purchase Order Invoices FY 2004:

  21. Questions & Answers

  22. Next Steps • Follow-up on any new issues that have been discussed today • Send out notes from today’s session to entire pilot group and the DUCs • Continue to solicit feedback via email as issues arise • Have additional smaller feedback sessions (if needed)

More Related