1 / 34

Exploring Magnetically Confined Burning Plasmas in the Laboratory

Exploring Magnetically Confined Burning Plasmas in the Laboratory. AAAS Annual Meeting Ned Sauthoff February 18, 2005. “Yearn to burn” “Burn to learn”. Marshall N. Rosenbluth. Roadmap…. Promise: Scientific Benefits and Energy Potential Prognosis: Scientific and Technological Readiness

wmeneses
Download Presentation

Exploring Magnetically Confined Burning Plasmas in the Laboratory

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Exploring Magnetically Confined Burning Plasmas in the Laboratory AAAS Annual Meeting Ned Sauthoff February 18, 2005 “Yearn to burn” “Burn to learn” Marshall N. Rosenbluth

  2. Roadmap… Promise: Scientific Benefits and Energy Potential Prognosis: Scientific and Technological Readiness Process: Approaches to the Study of Burning Plasmas Prospects: Technical and Organizational Outlooks Promise: Scientific Benefits and Energy Potential

  3. Plasma self-heating • Key Science Topics of Burning Plasmas: • Self-heating and self-organization • Energetic Particles • Size-scaling 3.5 MeV 14.1 MeV D+ + T+4He++ (3.5 MeV) + n0 (14.1 MeV)

  4. Roadmap… Promise: Scientific Benefits and Energy Potential Prognosis: Scientific and Technological Readiness Process: Approaches to the Study of Burning Plasmas Prospects: Technical and Organizational Outlooks

  5. FESAC Burning Plasma Panel 9/2001 Snowmass Summer Study 7/2002 The path to the US decision on Burning Plasmas and participation in ITER negotiations Earlierwork

  6. Physics Technology Experimental Approach and Objectives Snowmass identified issues and assessed burning plasma experiments Physics-focus now;Integration later FIRE IGNITOR Early sci/tech integrationITER BP contributions to ICCs Argue for scientific and technological benefits of approaches Assess benefits of a tokamak BPX to ICC path Identify key scientific, technological, and path issues Determine assessment criteria Perform uniform assessments of approaches

  7. The overwhelming consensus: • burning plasmas are opportunities ripe for exploration and discovery • tokamaks are ready to proceed to the burning plasma stage • the commonality of physics and technology would allow other toroidal configurations to benefit from a burning tokamak plasma

  8. The Tokamak is Ready for a Burning Plasma Test

  9. Roadmap… Promise: Scientific Benefits and Energy Potential Prognosis: Scientific and Technological Readiness Process: Approaches to the Study of Burning Plasmas Prospects: Technical and Organizational Outlooks

  10. Assessment of contributions of the options • IGNITOR, FIRE, and ITER would enable studies of the physics of burning plasma, advance fusion technology, and contribute to the development of fusion energy. • The contributions of the three approaches would differ considerably.

  11. NRC12/2002 - 2003 FESAC Burning Plasma Panel 9/2001 Snowmass Summer Study 7/2002 FESAC 2/2002- 9/2002 The path to the US decision on Burning Plasmas and participation in ITER negotiations Earlierwork

  12. NRC: “Burning Plasma: Bringing a Star to Earth” • “The United States should participate in ITER. If an international agreement to build ITER is reached, fulfilling the U.S. commitment should be the top priority in a balanced fusion science program.” • “The United States should pursue an appropriate level of involvement in ITER, which at a minimum would guarantee access to all data from ITER, the right to propose and carry out experiments, and a role in producing the high-technology components of the facility consistent with the size of the U.S. contribution to the program.”

  13. NRC12/2002 - 2003 Congress FESAC Burning Plasma Panel 9/2001 Snowmass Summer Study 7/2002 FESAC 2/2002- 9/2002 DOE OMB OSTP White House 1/2003 DOE/SC Cost Assessment11/2002 The path to the US decision on Burning Plasmas and participation in ITER negotiations Earlierwork

  14. US decision on joining ITER Negotiations (1/30/03 ) “Now is the time to expand our scope and embrace international efforts to realize the promise of fusion energy. Now it is time to take the next step on the way to having fusion deliver electricity to the grid. The President has decided to take that step. Therefore, I am pleased to announce today, that President Bush has decided that the United States will join the international negotiations on ITER.”(Energy Secretary Abraham at PPPL)

  15. International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor (ITER) Mission: To Demonstrate the Scientific and TechnologicalFeasibility of Fusion Energy

  16. Blanket Module Central Solenoid Port Plug Poloidal Field Coil Divertor Toroidal Field Coil Vacuum Vessel Cryostat ITER integrates science and long-pulse technology for the study of sustained burning plasmas

  17. Central Solenoid Model Coil Radius 3.5 m Height 2.8m Bmax=13 T W = 640 MJ 0.6 T/sec

  18. JA EU US RF 13.6 tons 6.6 tons 4.2 tons 0.8 tons Strand Cabling Jacketing Winding Reacting Insert / Outer Module Inner Module Testing Insert Coil International Fabrication of the Central Solenoid Model Coil H. Tsuji et al. /Fusion Engineering and Design 55 (2001)

  19. Toroidal Field Model Coil Height 4 m Width 3 m Bmax=7.8 T Imax = 80kA

  20. Vacuum Vessel and Shield/Blanket Modules

  21. Blanket Module HIP Joining Tech Size : 1.6 m x 0.93 m x 0.35 m

  22. Remote Maintenance of Blanket 4 t Blanket Sector Attachment Tolerance ± 0.25 mm

  23. Divertor Cassette

  24. Remote Maintenance of Divertor Cassette

  25. Vacuum Vessel Sector

  26. CENTRAL SOLENOID MODEL COIL VACUUM VESSEL SECTOR Radius 3.5 m Height 2.8m Bmax=13 T W = 640 MJ 0.6 T/sec Double-Wall, Tolerance ±5 mm BLANKET MODULE REMOTE MAINTENANCE OF DIVERTOR CASSETTE HIP Joining Tech Size : 1.6 m x 0.93 m x 0.35 m Attachment Tolerance ± 2 mm REMOTE MAINTENANCE OF BLANKET TOROIDAL FIELD MODEL COIL DIVERTOR CASSETTE Height 4 m Width 3 m Bmax=7.8 T Imax = 80kA 4 t Blanket Sector Attachment Tolerance ± 0.25 mm ITER Technology was developed during the EDA R&D Activities completed by July 2001. Heat Flux >15 MW/m2, CFC/W

  27. Instrumentation is key to science on ITER

  28. Roadmap… Promise: Scientific Benefits and Energy Potential Prognosis: Scientific and Technological Readiness Process: Approaches to the Study of Burning Plasmas Prospects: Technical and Organizational Outlooks

  29. 4 of 7 Central Solenoid Modules 15% of port-based diagnostic packages 44% of ICRH antenna + all transmission lines,RF-sources, and power supplies Start-up gyrotrons, all transmission lines and power supplies Baffle (Module 18) Roughing pumps, standard components Cooling for divertor, vacuum vessel, … Tokamak exhaust processing system pellet injector Allocation of responsibilities for in-kind contributions was achieved Steady-state power supplies

  30. EU site(Cadarache) Nov 26, 2003 France (Cadarache) withdrew Spain (Vandellòs) Site Selection Sequence/Schedule Japan (Rokkasho) Canada (Clarington)

  31. Scientific and technological work continues • Despite the lack of site-decision, technical work continues • completing R&D and design on in-kind contributions • Manufacturing studies and vendor qualification • The International Tokamak Physics Activity is identifying and addressing key scientific questions that relate to the performance of burning plasmas • Supporting the design activity • Leading to more effective research on ITER by • Improving understanding • Discovering new integrated scenarios to exploit understanding • Building integrated tools and simulations • Developing a strong work-force • Integrating international topical teams as precursors for ITER’s research operations

  32. Following the site-decision, innovative arrangements will be needed • Procurement systems, including in-kind contributions and change management • Resource management, with most funds remaining in the parties • Staffing by secondees, direct employees of the international organization, and contracts • Engaging the world’s industrial base for roles in management, fabrication, assembly/installation, and operations • Engaging the worldwide fusion research community to see ITER as an opportunity • Effective distributed project management the integrates the activities of the parties

  33. ILE Council Science and Technology Advisory Committee Management Advisory Committee Auditors Host country Director-General (DG) ILE Staff (professionals + support staff) Supporting Services Support for Project Management, Computer Network Technical works, etc. Central Team Contracts Field Team Field Team Field Team for construction phase Domestic Agency Domestic Agency Domestic Agency Conceptual Management Structure

  34. The Bottom Line…. • Scientific and technological assessments have affirmed • the significance of burning plasma science • the readiness of the tokamak as a vehicle for the study of toroidal magnetically-confined self-heated plasmas. • The world fusion community is striving to start the construction to enable burning plasma research. • The continuing development of organizational arrangements is challenging and may be useful to other areas of science.

More Related