1 / 20

Z-factory: lumi and polarization updates

Z-factory: lumi and polarization updates. Physics Case ‘short summary Impact of polarization at the Z-pole ‘parameter play’. Physics Case: Z-pole data. Why do we need such data a.s.a.p.? E.g. discrepancy between A LR (l) and A FB (b)

Download Presentation

Z-factory: lumi and polarization updates

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Z-factory: lumi and polarization updates • Physics Case ‘short summary • Impact of polarization at the Z-pole ‘parameter play’ G. Moortgat-Pick

  2. Physics Case: Z-pole data • Why do we need such data a.s.a.p.? • E.g. discrepancy between ALR(l) and AFB(b) • SLD: best single measurement, based on 5x105 Z’s • world average: sin2θeff=0.23153±0.00016 (central value, errors added in quadrature) • most sensitive observables: mW, sin2θeff,(g-2)μ,… We do need it already now ….. ←in b’s G. Moortgat-Pick

  3. Electroweak precision data G. Moortgat-Pick

  4. Relevance for ‘Higgs’ • Higgs prediction but also powerful consistency test! (see later) G. Moortgat-Pick

  5. mW vs. central value sin2θeff → Consistent with SM and SUSY G. Moortgat-Pick

  6. mW vs. SLD-value sin2θeff → not consistent with the SM G. Moortgat-Pick

  7. mW vs. LEP -value sin2θeff → not consistent with neither SM nor SUSY G. Moortgat-Pick

  8. Relevance for SUSY/New Physics Today: Δswq=1.6x10-4 ~1x10-4 G. Moortgat-Pick

  9. mt vs. central value sin2θeff G. Moortgat-Pick

  10. mt vs. SLD -value sin2θeff G. Moortgat-Pick

  11. mt vs. LEP -value sin2θeff • And please remember: sin2θsensitive to SUSY also in worst case scenarios (‘LHC sees nothing’) ! G. Moortgat-Pick

  12. What’s about other models? Z’@GigaZ? • Z-Z’ mixing effects: impact of heavy new gauge bosons at GigaZ → extends even LHC region in some models! G. Moortgat-Pick

  13. mtop= 173.3 +- 1.1 GeV • Further uncertainties: G. Moortgat-Pick

  14. Which accuracy should be envisaged? • δsin2θ ≤ 1 x 10-4 would be reasonable now (i.e. before ILC run) ! Conservative approach: • accept only luminosities that yield δsin2θ≤5x10-5 • assume ΔP/P=0.5% (SLD achieved: 0.25%) • Assume 500 days of running • Which polarization is needed? Two cases: • Both P(e-)=P(e+) (‘RR’) • P(e-)=90%, P(e+)= variable (‘LR’) G. Moortgat-Pick

  15. What’s the role of polarization? • Statistical uncertainty of ALR • If only polarized electrons:Δ ALR given by polarimeter uncertainty → depends on ΔσL, ΔσR, ΔP/P → main uncertainty at LC from ΔP/P~ 0.5 %→ 0. 25%... • If both beams are polarized: Blondel scheme →uncertainty depends on ΔσLL, ΔσLR, ΔσRL, ΔσRR not on ΔP/P ! →Some running in LL and RR required, about 10-20% of the time G. Moortgat-Pick

  16. Lumi requirements (up to 1x1033) • P(e-)=90% • P(e-)=P(e+) • Boundary (δsin2θ< 5x10-5) not achievable without P(e+)! • (At GigaZ: several 1033 needed to get 9.5x10-5 with P(e-) only) G. Moortgat-Pick

  17. Lumi requirements (up to 2x1032) • P(e-)=90% • P(e-)=P(e+) • Remark: ‘kinks’ no physics, just my ‘quantized’ step approach… G. Moortgat-Pick

  18. Lumi requirements (up to 7x1031) • P(e-)=90% • P(e-)=P(e+) • ‘Minimum’ polarization: ~P(e-)=P(e+)=25% (‘RR’) • ~ P(e+)=20% (‘LR’) G. Moortgat-Pick

  19. Further needs…. • Stable energy: since ΔALR / Δ√s ~ 0.2% / GeV • Energy spread should be controlled to ~MeV • Well understood and stable polarization (‘spin tracking’) • helicity flipping (if not: only alternative Blondel scheme applicable, loss of factor 2 in precision ) • Beamstrahlung has to be known to ~few % G. Moortgat-Pick

  20. Conclusions • Promising potential to achieve: δsin2θ <1x10-4 • Please remember: all results shown here were for δsin2θ <5x10-5 ! (factor 2 safety limit!) • ‘Minimum P(e+)’~25% (for very moderate lumi) • But P(e+) is mandatory! • Paper on ‘Z-pole’ in queue • was originally triggered by ‘physics use of ILC Z-pole calibration data’ • Polarization session at ECFA workshop: • Scheduled ‘polarization needs at Z-pole’ G. Moortgat-Pick

More Related