html5-img
1 / 51

3 –Tevatron -> LHC Physics

3 –Tevatron -> LHC Physics. 3.1 QCD - Jets and Di - jets 3.2 Di - Photons 3.3 b Pair Production at Fermilab 3.4 t Pair Production at Fermilab 3.5 D-Y and Lepton Composites 3.6 EW Production W Mass and Width Pt of W and Z bb Decays of Z, Jet Spectroscopy

Download Presentation

3 –Tevatron -> LHC Physics

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. 3 –Tevatron -> LHC Physics • 3.1 QCD - Jets and Di - jets • 3.2 Di - Photons • 3.3 b Pair Production at Fermilab • 3.4 t Pair Production at Fermilab • 3.5 D-Y and Lepton Composites • 3.6 EW Production • W Mass and Width • Pt of W and Z • bb Decays of Z, Jet Spectroscopy • 3.7 Higgs Mass from Precision EW Measurements

  2. Kinematics - Review Initial State

  3. Review Kinematics - II Final State

  4. Jet Et Distribution and Composites Simplest jet measurement - inclusive jet ET . Jet defined as energy in cone, radius R. Classical method to find substructure. Look for wide angle (S wave) scattering. Limits are  ~ s.

  5. CDF Run II – Data Reach

  6. Dijet Et Distribution – Run I As |3 - 4| increases MJJ increases and the cross section decreases. The plateau width decreases as ET increases (kinematic limit)

  7. Dijet Mass Distribution Falls as 1/M3 due to parton scattering and ~ (1- M/s)12 due to structure function source distributions. Look for deviations at large M (composite variations or resonant structure due to excited quarks). Limits at Tevatron and LHC will increase as C.M. energy.

  8. Initial, Final State Radiation The initial state has ~ no transverse momentum. Thus a 2 body final state is back-to-back in azimuth. Take the 2 highest Et jets in the 2 J or more sample. At the higher Pt scales available at the LHC ISR and FSR will become increasingly important – determined by the strong coupling constant at that Pt scale.

  9. “Running” of s - Measure in 3J/2J Energy below which strong interaction is strong

  10. Excited Quark Composites q q* g Look for resonant J - J structure, with a limit ~ C.M. energy

  11. t Channel Angular Distribution If t channel exchange describes the dynamics, then  distribution is flat - as in Rutherford scattering. Deviations at large scattering angles would indicate composite quarks.

  12. Diphoton, CDF Run II 2--> 2 processes similar to jets. Down by coupling and source factors Also useful in jet balancing for calibration. Important SM background in Higgs searches. Must establish SM photon signals u+g-->u+ (Lecture 2) u+u-->+

  13. COMPHEP – Tree Only Tevatron, 2 TeV ||<1, ET>10 GeV

  14. B Production @ FNAL d/dPT ~ 1/PT3 so (>) ~ 1/PT2 Spectrum is as expected withPT ~ M/2, g+g --> b + b. Adjustment in b -> B fragmentation function resolves the discrepancy. Establish a b jet signal and b tagging efficiency using 1 tag to 2 tag ratio. Many LHC searches and SM backgrounds (e.g. top pairs) require b tagging.

  15. B Production – Rapidity Distribution Note rapidity plateau which extends to y ~ 5 at this low mass, ~ 2mb scale. At the LHC tracking and Si vertexing extends to |y| < 2.5.

  16. B Lifetimes Use Si tracker to find decay vertices and the production vertex. (B) ~ (b). For Bc both the b and the c quark can decay ==> shorter lifetime. At LHC establish lifetime scale.

  17. Weak Decay Widths Fermi theory Standard Model m W G2 2 body weak decay t -> W b

  18. Top Mass and Jet Spectroscopy- Run I D0 - lepton + jets t-->Wb W-->JJ, l

  19. Jet Spectroscopy - Top CDF - Lepton + jets (Si or lepton tags) t-->Wb so 2 b’s in the event

  20. tt --> Wb+Wb, W--> qq or l CDF + D0 Top quark mass from data taken in the twentieth century

  21. Top Mass @ FNAL Run I Run II

  22. Top Production Cross Section > 100x gain in going to the LHC. The discovery at the Tevatron becomes a nasty background at the LHC. However, W-> J+J in top pair events sets the calorimeter energy scale at the LHC. Are the mass and the cross section consistent with a quark with SM couplings?

  23. Run II Top Cross section No evidence for deviation from SM coupling of a heavy quark. At the LHC top pair events have jets, heavy flavor, missing energy and leptons. They thus serve as a sanity check that the detector is working correctly in many final state SM particles. The LHC experiments must establish a top pair sample before contemplating, for example, SUSY discoveries.

  24. DY and Lepton Composites Run I Drell-Yan: Falls with the source function. For ud the W is prominent, while for uu the Z is the main high mass feature. Above that mass there is no SM signal, and searches for composite leptons or sequential W’, Z’ are made.

  25. Extract V,A Coupling to Fermions F/B asymmetry allows an extraction of the A and V couplings, gA, gV of fermions to the Z at high mass – compare to SM. If a Z’ is seen at the LHC, use the F/B distribution to try to extract the A and V couplings.

  26. Run II – DY High Mass

  27. Run II – DY High Mass Whole “zoo” of new Physics candidates – all still null. At LHC establish muon and electron momentum scale and resolution with Z mass and width. Explore tail when backgrounds are under control.

  28. W - High Transverse Mass Run I Search DY at high mass for sequential W’. Mass calculated in 2 spatial dimensions only using missing transverse energy.

  29. W - SM Mass and Width Prediction Mass: W Width; Color factor of 3 for quarks. 9 distinct dilepton or diquark final states.

  30. COMPHEP – W BR Check that the naïve estimates are confirmed in COMPHEP for W and Z into 2*x.

  31. W,Z Production Cross Section Cross section x BR for W is ~ 4 pb for Tevatron Run II

  32. Lumi with W, Z ? At present in Run II, using W,Z is more accurate than Lumi monitor. Use W and Z at LHC as “standard candles”. Test of trigger and reco efficiencies – cross-check minbias trigger normalization.

  33. W and Z - Width and Leptonic B.R. Expect 1/9 ~ 0.11 Expect 9 (0.21 GeV) = 1.9 GeV

  34. Direct W Width Measurement Far from the pole mass the Breit – Wigner width (power law) dominates over the Gaussian resolution decay widths of 1.5 to 2.5 GeV Monte Carlo

  35. W Transverse Mass D0 and CDF: Transverse plane only. Use Z as a control sample. At large mass dominated by the BW width, since falloff is slow w.r.t the Gaussian resolution.

  36. W Mass – Colliders, Run I Hadron WW (LEP II) production near threshold (Lecture 1 )

  37. W Mass - All Methods Direct Precision EW measurements

  38. I.S.R. and PTW u d W+ g 2-->1 has no F.S. PT. Recall Lecture 2 - charmonium production. Scale is set by the FS mass in 2 -> 1.

  39. COMPHEP - PTW Basic 2 --> 2 behavior, 1/PT3. . Gluon radiation from either initial quark.

  40. Lepton Asymmetry at Tevatron

  41. CDF – Lepton Asymmetry Positron goes in antiproton direction Electron goes in proton direction  Charge asymmetry, constrains PDF. Recall u > d at large x.

  42. COMPHEP - Asymmetry COMPHEP generates the asymmetry in pbar-p at 2 TeV. Can use the PDF that COMPHEP has available to check PDF sensitivity. Generate your own asymmetry and look for deviations.

  43. Z --> bb, Run I Dijets with 2 decay vertices (b tags). Look for calorimetric J-J mass distribution. Mass resolution, dM ~ 15 GeV. This exercise is practice for searches of J-J spectra such as Z’ decays into di-jets, or H decays into b quark pairs.

  44. Run II Mass Resolution Using tracker information to replace distinct energy deposit in the calorimetry for charged particles with the tracker momentum – which is more precisely measured. Seems to gain ~ 20%. This is quite hard – at LHC we will use W->J+J in top pair events.

  45. VV at Tevatron - W from D0 The WW  vertex as measured at Run II is consistent with the SM, as it is at LEP II. Transverse mass in leptonic W decays with additional photon.

  46. WW at D0 – Run II Look at dileptons plus missing transverse energy. Tests the WWZ and WW  vertex as at LEP - II

  47. WW Cross Section Measured at CDF Extrapolate to LHC energy. COMPHEP gives a D-Y WW cross section at the LHC of 72 pb. At LHC will be able to begin to explore W-W scattering independent of Higgs searches.

  48. W Mass Corrections Due to Top, Higgs Klein-Gordon Dirac W mass shift due to top (m) and Higgs (M)

  49. What is MH and How Do We Measure It? • The Higgs mass is a free parameter in the current “Standard Model” (SM). • Precision data taken on the Z resonance constrains the Higgs mass. Mt = 176 +- 6 GeV, MW = 80.41 +- 0.09 GeV. Lowest order SM predicts that MZ = MW/cosW.. Radiative corrections due to loops. • Note the opposite signs of contributions to mass from fermion and boson loops. Crucial for SUSY and radiative stability. b t H W W W W W

  50. CDF D0 Data Favor a Light Higgs

More Related