1 / 13

Help Map (Russian Fires) Crisis Mapping Case Study

Help Map (Russian Fires) Crisis Mapping Case Study. Alexey Sidorenko Prague, March 9 th 2011. Prerequisites for Wildfire Crisis in Russia, 2010. Unusually hot period; Degraded system of wildfire protection; Almost simultaneous outburst of wildfires in different Russian regions;

winda
Download Presentation

Help Map (Russian Fires) Crisis Mapping Case Study

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Help Map (Russian Fires)Crisis Mapping Case Study AlexeySidorenko Prague, March 9th 2011

  2. Prerequisites for Wildfire Crisis in Russia, 2010 • Unusually hot period; • Degraded system of wildfire protection; • Almost simultaneous outburst of wildfires in different Russian regions; • Raise of activism on the background of government’s inability to cope with the disaster;

  3. What’s the Story of Help Map? • Idea of implementing digital tools wasn’t new; • Two persons publicly suggested usage of Ushahidi in their blogs; • One of them, Gregory Asmolov, proposed to try to install Ushahidi; • First reaction: “It would take at least a month” (MEH!) • Second reaction: “This is actually quite easy! THIS COULD WORK!” • Third reaction: IT WORKS!!!! • Result: Ushahidi deployment in 2-3 days;

  4. Difficulties • Poor support for Cyrillic fonts; • Inactive community support -> necessity to fix all the bugs by ourselves; • Poor documentation / difficult customization of the platform; • Unexpected high load of the server (10-15 thousand unique visitors daily) -> necessity to move to a new hosting really fast;

  5. Our Main Principles At That Time • CROWDSOURCING. We crowdsource everything: message moderation, PHP/JavaScript programming, server optimization, server hosting, design; • TRUST. We trust all volunteers, we don’t have time for background checks – dangerous but necessary; • CREDIT. We credit everyone who helps us – people need to know and feel that their effort is taken into account; • NEUTRALITY. we don’t support with any political organization;

  6. Help Map The First Ushahidi implementation in Russia; Stage 1: Monitoring of various sources concerning wildfires; Stage 2: Coordination of volunteers and victims of wildfires;

  7. Information Coordination • Connecting random initiatives together -> creating synergy; • Connecting those who asked for help and those who could provide help; • Providing information on the abilities of private initiatives.

  8. Information coordination Pozar_ru Doctor Liza Igor Cherskiy Russian Church Volunteer groups Random Citizen Initiatives

  9. Work of Coordination Center • Moderation of reports; • Monitoring of sources; • Coordination of the work of remote moderators; • Site maintenance; • Phone “Hot Line” maintenance; • Coordination of help. Фотографии ottenki_serogo

  10. Full cycle of help Clothes Transportation «I have a car. Mazda 3, I am available to lift people or food to any place in the Moscow or Ryazan region. «We have some spare clothes”, Moscow Victims Help Report • «In Vladimir region we need (August 14, 2010): • Утюги - 50 шт • Тонометр – 1 • Глюкометр (+тестполоски) – 1 • ...» Trip report: we brought food and clothes to …

  11. Weak sides of the project • Limited information flow from the cell phones; • Limited number of sources (mostly from the bigger cities); • Mapping as a process was unusual for some less computer literate users; • Technical instability; • Lack of interactivity on the basis of the platform; • Limited feedback functionality (volunteers and victims couldn’t connect with each other without the help of moderators); • After the crisis is gone the future of the platform is unstable;

  12. Perspectives: • Upgrade of the platform to version 2.0 + change of design to our own platform; • Integration of aerial photographs; • Information support in endangered regions ; • Better cooperation with the NGOs

  13. Thanks! AlexeySidorenko • Sidorenko.a@gmail.com • Twitter: @sidorenko_intl

More Related