1 / 9

CIVIL LIBERTIES & CIVIL RIGHTS

CIVIL LIBERTIES & CIVIL RIGHTS. What’s the difference? (Protection from govt. versus protection of govt ; Liberty versus equality) THREE THEMES a.) gradual nationalization b.) Federal Courts as major policymakers c.) Nothing is absolute. BILL OF RIGHTS .

willow
Download Presentation

CIVIL LIBERTIES & CIVIL RIGHTS

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. CIVIL LIBERTIES & CIVIL RIGHTS What’s the difference? (Protection from govt. versus protection ofgovt; Liberty versus equality) THREE THEMESa.) gradual nationalizationb.) Federal Courts as major policymakers c.) Nothing is absolute

  2. BILL OF RIGHTS 1.) political freedoms: Amendments I (speech, press, religion, assembly, petition) and II (bear arms) 2.) rights of the accused: IV search & seizure, V self-incrim., VI speedy trial/impartial jury/counsel/witnesses, VIII no exc. Bail or C&U punishment 3.) property rights III (quartering) and V (takings clause) WHY SO MUCH EMPHASIS ON RIGHTS OF THE ACCUSED?

  3. DOES THE BoR APPLY TO THE STATES? ORIGINAL ANSWER: “No” (Barron vs. Baltimore, 1833) THE CIVIL WAR AMENDMENTS: 13th (slavery), 15th (voting rights) and the all-important 14th ----Three important but ambiguous phrases in 14tha.) due process of lawb.) privileges and immunitiesc.) equal protection

  4. DOES THE BoR APPLY TO THE STATES Slaughterhouse Cases (1873): answer still “no” Gradual incorporation of BoR into state constitutions----Started with political freedoms (1920s and 1930s)----Continued with rights of the accused (1950s and 1960s) Now: mostly ‘Yes’ (3 exceptions)

  5. SUPREME COURT EVOLVED RULES for deciding CL cases FREEDOM OF SPEECH RESTRICTIONS --Schenck v. US (1919): “clear and present danger” – makes freedom of speech partly contingent on external conditions --”Fighting words” -- Slander/libel --- doesn’t apply to political or even public figures--Does symbolic speech count too?

  6. FREEDOM OF SPEECH AND PRESS OBSCENITY--1957 Roth v. US: “community standards” and “prurient interest” --1973 Miller v. California: community standards, need for specifics, lacking in other value PRESS ISSUES--No “prior restraint” --Intra-BoR conflict: what if freedom of the press interferes with rights to fair trial and confront witnesses?

  7. FREEDOM OF RELIGION More intra-BoR conflict: between “establishment” clause and “free exercise” clause Frequently recurring issues1.) Govt. aid to religious schools and charities: the Lemon v. Kurzman test (1971) 2.) School prayer and Bible reading: Engel v. Vitale (1962) 3.) Religious displays on govt. property:Commandments, Nativity Scenes, etc. 4.) Can otherwise illegal activities be legalized as part of religious practice? “Compelling govt interest/least restrictive manner” standard replaced by “neutrality” standard

  8. SECOND, FOURTH, and FIFTH AMENDMENTS What does the 2nd Amendment really mean? DC v. Heller (2008) Fourth Amendment: The Exclusionary Rule (applied to Feds in 1914, states in 1961 w/Mapp v. Ohio) Fifth Amendment: self-incrimination (Miranda v. Arizona 1966); what double jeopardy means (and doesn’t mean)

  9. Civil Liberties: 6th thru 9th Amendments 6th AmendmentEvolution of right to counsel, culminating in Gideon v. Wainwright (1963) 8th Amendment – is the death penalty “cruel and unusual”?No executions took place between 1972-1976; Gregg v. Georgia created guidelines for valid death penalty laws Right to privacy: where is it? “penumbras” of 3rd, 4th, 5th, & 9th AmendmentsGriswold v. Connecticut (1965)Roe v. Wade (1973); Lawrence v. Texas (2003)

More Related