R. Hudson - VFR Research. Interception. Before precipitation reaches the soil, it must pass through whatever vegetation cover is present. (In urban areas, buildings and other structures act to intercept precipitation.)Vegetation cover retains some of this precipitation and returns it to the atmosph
Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.
1. R. Hudson - VFR Research Hydrology
Interception, effects of forestry on snow hydrology
2. R. Hudson - VFR Research Interception Before precipitation reaches the soil, it must pass through whatever vegetation cover is present. (In urban areas, buildings and other structures act to intercept precipitation.)
Vegetation cover retains some of this precipitation and returns it to the atmosphere by evaporation and/or sublimation - this is interception
3. R. Hudson - VFR Research Precipitation interception by a coniferous canopy Coniferous canopies intercept both rainfall and snowfall - this interception loss can be a significant component of water balance.
Studies of rainfall interception in coastal BC and elsewhere show that up to 30% of total annual rainfall does not reach the ground under a mature coniferous canopy.
A similar percentage of total annual snowfall is intercepted by mature conifers.
4. R. Hudson - VFR Research Rainfall interception rain can fall directly through gaps in the canopy (throughfall), or it can hit the foliage and branches
once the foliage has been completely wetted by the rain, droplets will begin to cascade down through the canopy
water can drip off the canopy to the ground (throughfall) or can run down stems (stemflow)
evaporative losses can occur from the canopy, or from vegetation at the forest floor (interception)
5. R. Hudson - VFR Research
6. R. Hudson - VFR Research Rain interception has been studied in detail a forest canopy has a saturation capacity of 0.5 to 2.0 mm of water depending on the age and structure of the stand
water can be evaporated by advective energy even during storms, so the capacity of the canopy is constantly replenished
throughfall and stemflow are monitored with appropriate collectors, subtracted from rainfall on an area basis to calculate interception loss
7. Rain interception Spittlehouse (1998) (from Spittlehouse, D.L. 1998. Rainfall interception in young and mature conifer forests in British Columbia. In: Weather Data Requirements for Integrated Pest Management. 23rd Conference on Agricultural and Forest Meteorology. American Meteorological Society, Boston Mass. 171-174.)
interception loss is a function of storm size and the age of the stand (i.e., tree size)
asymptotic relationship: (coastal sites)
immature forest (6-10 metre trees) reaches a maximum at about 14 mm for storms > 100 mm
mature forest, interception loss maxes out at an average of 25 mm for storms > 100 mm, but in spring storms, interception loss was about twice that for winter storms
8. from Spittlehouse, 1998 Rainfall interception as a function of storm size and season (coastal sites)
9. from Spittlehouse, 1998 Rain interception Coast vs. Interior For mature spruce-fir-pine forests at interior sites, results are similar:
I is much less (max of 4 mm) due to smaller rain storms.
I expressed as a percent of annual rain is similar in coastal and interior forests
Interception was 25-30% of annual rainfall for mature forest depending on species and crown density
Interception was 10-20% of annual rainfall for immature forest
10. R. Hudson - VFR Research Rain and snow interception Studies show that interception is proportional to canopy density or canopy height for both rain and snow
Generally, interception loss of snow is greater than that of rain for coastal sites
interception for snow is as high as 50%
interception for rain is as high as 30%
I is different for mature and immature canopies due to different size and development of trees
11. R. Hudson - VFR Research Effect of Forest Density on Interception
12. R. Hudson - VFR Research Snow Interception vs. Canopy Height Gray Creek 1997
13. R. Hudson - VFR Research Effect of canopy structure Deciduous vs. coniferous: interception is greater for coniferous than deciduous forests
needles can hold more water than broad leaves due to greater surface area
conifers maintain foliage year-round
Mature vs. immature:
rain interception greater for mature forest
snow interception is affected by stocking density as well as canopy structure in terms of tree form
14. R. Hudson - VFR Research Water balance implications Forest harvesting always increases water available for runoff by decreasing interception
this increased availability can be in the order of 30-50% for newly harvested coastal sites
Increases in peak flows
in rain dominated watersheds, or for spring storms, water yield and peak flow could be increased by 25-40% for a 100 mm storm
15. R. Hudson - VFR Research In snow dominated watersheds in coastal B.C., snow accumulation and average melt rates for harvested sites during the melt period can be up to twice that of uncut old growth forest.
On a watershed scale, those potential increases are proportional to the proportion of the watershed logged
e.g. 25% of watershed logged, logged areas experience 34% increase in snow catch, then there is 8.5% more water available for runoff
16. R. Hudson - VFR Research Dominance of rain vs. snow Rain dominated zone = 0-300 metres elevation on the coast
Rain-on-snow zone (transient snow zone)
usually about 300-800 metres elevation on the coast
fluctuating freezing levels result in alternating snow accumulation and ablation in winter
rain on snow produces greater runoff rates than snowmelt or rainfall alone
17. R. Hudson - VFR Research rain-on-snow produces largest peak flows on the coast where it occurs frequently, results in flooding in the interior where it is much less frequent than on the coast
it is thought that logging in the rain-on-snow zone has the greatest potential to increase peak flows
Snow dominated areas: >800 metres on coast, most of the interior
logging results in greater water yield due to decreased interception, and increased peak flows due to accelerated melt
18. R. Hudson - VFR Research Hydrologic Recovery We have seen that logging alters the potential to produce runoff at the site that is logged, by reducing interception and increasing rates of snowmelt
Hydrologic recovery is the process by which forest regeneration restores the runoff production to near pre-harvest condition
How quickly does a harvested area recover?
19. R. Hudson - VFR Research Hydrologic recovery for coastal B.C.
20. R. Hudson - VFR Research Equation - hydrologic recovery Research shows that hydrologic recovery of a regenerating stand can best be expressed as an exponential function of mean canopy height of the regeneration.
There is a recovery threshold - minimum canopy height before recovery will begin, in this case the threshold is 2.25 metres
Assumes the stand is fully stocked; if patchy, the coverage must also be accounted for.
21. R. Hudson - VFR Research Equivalent Clear-cut Area As an area that has been harvested begins to regenerate, its original area is reduced by the level of recovery
A = original opening area
e.g., a 10 ha opening has an average canopy height of 8 metres. Hydrologic recovery is 80%, so its ECA is 2 ha.
a 20 ha opening has 6 m regeneration, but in clumps with 50% coverage. Recovery is (0.5X70%) so ECA is 13 ha.