1 / 16

The magician & the Mass media

Citizen Kane (1941) James Naremore. The magician & the Mass media. Context. The work of the young Orson Welles Proto-Fascist demagogues After the whispered “Rosebud,” is “Don’t believe everything you hear on the radio.” Against one of America’s most wealthy media moguls

whitley
Download Presentation

The magician & the Mass media

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Citizen Kane (1941) James Naremore The magician & the Mass media

  2. Context • The work of the young Orson Welles • Proto-Fascist demagogues • After the whispered “Rosebud,” is “Don’t believe everything you hear on the radio.” • Against one of America’s most wealthy media moguls • Mrs. Kane sits at the right foreground, her face the very image of stern puritanical sacrifice • The mise-en-scène under fairly rigid control

  3. Scene

  4. Analysis • Two snow sleds • The first is named “Rosebud” & is given to Kane by his mother • The second is a Christmas present from Kane’s guardian, Thatcher • Which is called “Crusader,” is presented fully to the camera • The title character has not only two sleds but t & two friends • In its last moment, the film shifts from intellectual irony to dramatic irony, from apparent skepticism to apparent revelation

  5. Analysis • Voyeurism inherent in the medium, and each leaves Kane an enigma • In the first shot, we see a “No Trespassing” sign that the camera promptly ignores • All the while encountering a bizarre montage: monkeys in a cage, gondolas in a stream, a golf course • As voyeuristic as anything in a Hitchcock movie • Like Kane’s own newspapers, the camera is an “inquirer,” are like teasing affronts to our curiosity • Aligning himself first with the progressives & then with the Fascists

  6. Analysis • As a mythical character like Noah or Kubla Khan • Everybody is involved in a dubious pursuit • It’s a film about complexity, not about relativity • Once again the search for “Rosebud” seems tawdry • ex. Thompson’s abortive interview with Susan • She never heard of Rosebud • With a mild shock or a witty image at the beginning & a joke or an ironic twist at the end

  7. Analysis • In a charmingly exuberant & altogether anti-realistic montage, he constantly turns to face the camera, muttering in disgust as the young Kane grows up, founds a newspaper, & then attacks Wall Street • Capital, it seems, is always in charge of Kane’s life • Kane and Leland in The Inquirer offices • Bernstein always places personal loyalty above principle • Bernstein’s reminiscences are chiefly about adventure & male camaraderie

  8. Analysis • As the doggedly loyal Bernstein • Hinting that his involvement with Kane has sexual implications • Where Kane unsuccessfully tries to interest Leland in a woman, but even without that scene he seems to have no active sex life • It is Leland, not Emily Kane, who behaves like a jilted lover

  9. Analysis • The comic toothache scene is Susan Alexander’s apartment • The closing line of Susan’s song concerns the theme of power; it comes from The Barber of Seville, & roughly translates “I have sworn it, I will conquer.” • Large-scale effects with a modest budget • Painted, Expressionistic image suggesting Kane’s delusions of grandeur & the crowd’s lack of individuality. • Everything is dominated by Kane’s ego: the initial “K” he wears as a stickpin, the huge blowup of his jowly face on a poster, & the incessant “I” in his public speech • Occasionally we see Kane’s supporters isolated in contrasting close-ups; but his political rival stands high above the action, dominating the frame like a sinister power

  10. Analysis • Just at the moment when Kane’s political ambitions are wrecked, the film shifts into its examination of his sexual life • His tyranny is his treatment of Susan • An absurd plagiarism case against Welles & Mankiewicz • She represents for Kane a “cross-section of the American public.” • When Kane meets her, she is a working girl, undereducated & relatively innocent, • his relationship with her is comparable to his relationship with the masses who read his papers • “you talk about the people as though you owned them,” Leland says. Kane’s treatment of Susan illustrates the truth of his charge • Susan is reduced from a pleasant, attractive girl to a near suicide

  11. Analysis • Begin the arduous, comically inappropriate series of music lessons • She attempts to quit the opera, but Kane orders her to continue because “I don’t propose to have myself made ridiculous.” • In a scene remarkable for the way it shows the pain of both people, his shadow falls over her face – just as he will later tower over her in the “party” scene, when a woman’s ambiguous scream is heard distantly on the sound track • Personal concerns, how the public & the personal are interrelated

  12. Analysis • Throughout, Kane is presented with a mixture of awe, satiric invective, & sympathy • The surreal picnic, with a stream of black cars driving morosely down a beach toward a swampy encampment, where a jazz band plays • Both shots are impressive uses of optical printing. In response, Kane blindly destroys her room & remembers his childhood loss • Thompson becomes a slightly troubled onlooker • Here it might be noted that Welles was uneasy about the whole snow-sled idea

  13. Analysis • A child-man, he spends all his energies rebelling against anyone who asserts authority over his will • Imprisoned by his childhood ego, Kane treats everything as a toy: first the sled, then the newspaper, then the Spanish-American War • Ultimately settling on the “No Trespassing” sign outside the gate. We are back where we began. Even the film’s title has been a contradiction in terms

  14. Conclusion • Richard Nixon, the “Hotel Xanadu” • In translating Hearst into a creature of fiction, he & Mankiewicz borrowed freely from the lives of other American capitalists (among them Samuel Insull & John McCormack). • They salted the story with references to Welles’s own biography • at several junctures they departed from well-known facts about Hearst • The Hearst press, this in contrast to the Hearst-Davies relationship • Most of these changes tend to create sympathy for Kane • By showing Kane as a tragicomic failure

  15. Conclusion • Kane clearly does satirize Hearst’s public life • Kane’s manipulative interest in the Spanish-American War • In the election scenes it depicts the corruption of machine politics with the force of a great editorial cartoon • The film is explicit in its denunciation, showing his supposed democratic aspirations as in reality a desire for power. We even see him on a balcony conferring with Hitler • Kane suggests that the process of discovery is more important than any pat conclusion • Watching a movie rather than reality itself

  16. Conclusion • Because of the power he wielded in Hollywood • The paradox is that Welles had no desire to wreck the motion-picture industry. • Kane was held to a relatively modest A-picture budget • Industry bosses perceived Welles as an “artist” & a left-wing ideologue who might bring trouble • He would never again be allowed such freedom at a major studio

More Related