The United Nations and the Suez Crisis

1. The United Nations and the Suez Crisis

2. The United Nations • 1945: Created in San Francisco with four basic goalsor otherwise known as THE UN MANDATE: • World peace • Cooperation among nations • Defending human rights • Improving the standard of living for all nations

3. Structure of the UN • The General Assembly: • Each member state has one vote • 2/3 majority to pass on important issues • Discuss issues related to world peace • No power to enforce decisions, can only make recommendations

4. 2) The Security Council • Responsible for maintaining world peace • 5 Permanent members: China, France, the UK, US, Russia • 10 temporary members serve two year terms - elected to Council • 1948 - 1950: Canada gained seat on council

5. Majority of at least 9 – 15 required for any resolution to pass • ‘Veto Power’ a.k.a ‘Great Powers Unanimity’: on very important issues all 5 permanent members must vote yes. • So on the most pressing issues, even if you have a 9 – 15 majority, if 5 out of 9 are not permanent member votes, the resolution will not pass.

6. 1) UN recommend conflicting parties reach agreement by peaceful means • 2) End disputes that lead to fighting a.s.a.p. • Cease fire directives • UN peacekeeping forces - help reduce tensions, separate fighting sides and create calm negotiating conditions • 3) Enforcement measures • Economic sanctions (trade embargoes) • Collective military action

8. The Korean War • Communist N. Korea (supported by Soviet Union and China) invaded democratic S. Korea (supported by the US) • The First shot fired in Cold War • Korea was not on the the US list of countries it was willing to defend.

9. Enter the United Nations: • A chance to restore peace by honoring the principle of collective security. • UN Security Council passes action against aggression in South Korea.

10. The Armistice • UN forces comprised of 32 countries but dominated by Canadian and American forces pushed back the North Koreans and position themselves too close to the Chinese border. • China rushed 200,000 volunteers and pushes the UN forces to the 38th parallel. • President Truman, wishing to avoid a full scale conflict with China, negotiates an armistice. • 1953: Armistice signed dividing Korea between North and South at the 38th parallel.

11. Though it is likely that US decisions would have been the same without the UN, the SC resolutions on Korea provided international legitimacy to US actions on the Korean peninsula, as Truman was determined to counter the Communist threat • While some observers have described this involvement as a type of collective security engagement, others have considered it a police action and yet others have called the UN’s role in Korea a unique phenomenon

12. The SC did refer to the Korean situation as one of aggression and had authorized military support for South Korea but this was not mandated . • Moreover, the key strategic and tactical plans concerning the Korea conflict may have held the UN’s name, but in fact they were all decided upon in Washington. • The legitimacy of the war was, of course, challenged by the USSR It is thus not accurate to portray the Korean War as a classic example of collective security– rather in this case it may be argued that the UN was mainly used by the US as a means to achieve an end through an international legal framework.

13. Canada’s Role in Korea: • 25, 000 soldiers saw action in the war and were convinced they were supporting the ‘free world’ in a fight to stop the spread of communism. • Significance: • Connection to British foreign policy replaced with American foreign policy. As was often the case in the cold war, Canada found itself on the same side as the US but not always agreeing with everything the US wanted to do.

14. Lester B. Pearson and the Suez Crisis • The Rise of Middle Eastern Nationalism and the Role of Canada as peace-keepers: • The Suez Canal Crisis – 1956 • Disputes erupt in Egypt over control of the Suez Canal

15. The Suez Canal

16. Background to the Suez Crisis • Canal opened in 1869 - financed by French and Egyptian governments. • Important strategically: links Red Sea and Mediterranean Sea • 2/3 of Europe’s oil passes through canal. • 1875: Egyptians forced to sell their shares (control) in the canal to the British • 1950’s: Canal owned by British and French

17. Egyptian President Gamel Abdul Nasser: Egyptian Nationalist • As Britain was withdrawing from Egypt, Nasser began completion of the Aswan High Dam project across the Nile river. • In 1956 because of Nasser’s dealings with the USSR, Britain and the US cut off aid for the Aswan project. • Nasser decided to nationalize the Suez Canal, which incensed the British and French who then decided to invade and occupy Egypt

18. The Suez Canal Crisis: Continued • Canada was concerned about the effect of the Suez Crisis on international relations • Canada realized that while the US might not agree with Nasser’s actions, they would not support Britain in an aggressive action against Egypt. • Israel feeling threatened by Egypt, planned to invade with the support of France and Britain • Ignored UN Security Council recommendation to cease hostilities • US was angry at its allies (Britain, France, and Israel) for not consulting them before attacking Egypt.

19. The USSR responded with an ultimatum: Atomic Bombs would rain down on London and Paris if the invasion did not end. • US threatened retaliation against any Soviet involvement • Lester B. Pearson proposed that a UN Emergency Force be sent in to separate and mediate between the rival armies in Egypt. • Proposal is accepted and Canada supervises a peaceful withdrawal, allowing the other countries involved in the conflict to safe face.

20. Lester B. Pearson is awarded the Nobel Peace Prize for his efforts in defusing the Suez Canal Crisis.

21. The UN Emergency Force (UNEF I) was the first ever armed peace mission that supervised the disengagement of forces and acted as a buffer between Egypt and Israel • In actual fact, the USSR and the US were not so far apart in this instance and President Eisenhower was seen as acting in line with collective security, as he stood against his traditional allies, since their actions were regarded as aggression

22. Almost simultaneously to the Suez Canal conflict, the GA created a resolution that was ignored which called upon the USSR to remove its forces from Hungary . • This indicated that while the UK and France could be persuaded, the Soviet Union could not

23. Homework: • Research: Has the UN succeeded or failed in its mandate over the past 60 years? Provide three examples to support either view. Be prepared to share!