1 / 10

Use of Evaluations in Austria A Coordinated & Ongoing Approach Andreas Maier, ÖROK

Use of Evaluations in Austria A Coordinated & Ongoing Approach Andreas Maier, ÖROK Reinhard Schinner, Carinthia Seminar on Mid Term Evaluation in Objective 1 and 2 Regions 8 October 2004 in Brussels. Overview. Background information Organisation & Process Experiences

wcamper
Download Presentation

Use of Evaluations in Austria A Coordinated & Ongoing Approach Andreas Maier, ÖROK

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Use of Evaluations in Austria A Coordinated & Ongoing Approach Andreas Maier, ÖROK Reinhard Schinner, Carinthia Seminar on Mid Term Evaluation in Objective 1 and 2 Regions 8 October 2004 in Brussels

  2. Overview • Background information • Organisation & Process • Experiences • “Freestyle” Ongoing Evaluation – the Case Carinthia • Objective 2 Programme Carinthia • Ongoing Evaluation – Theory • Ongoing Evaluation – Experience

  3. 1. Background Information 1 Obj. 1 & 8 Obj. 2 Programmes SF: Obj. 1: 282Mio EUR;Obj. 2: 627Mio EUR; Phasing Out: 107Mio EUR  9 Regional MAs  3 National PAs

  4. 2. Organisation (1) Coordination and Work Platform at ÖROK-level Horizonal Studies Evaluation Team 1 Evaluation Team 2 Evaluation Team 3 Evaluation Team 4 Evaluation Team 5 Contracts Objective 1 & 2 Programmes Coordination & Work-Platform • Acting as „Steering Group“ at federal level • Ensure Co-ordination across programmes • Exchange of Opinions & Experiences • Horizontal Studies for Environment & Sustainability,Gender Mainstreaming • 4 Workshops & 1 Seminar

  5. 2. Process (2) Embed Mid-Term-Evaluation & Up-Date in an Ongoing Evaluation Process 2000 - 2001 - 2002 - 2003 - 2004 - 2005 - 2006 Ongoing Mid-Term Up-Date

  6. 3. Experiences Evaluation as „Learning Tool“  Transfer of Knowledge  Communication / Co-ordination  Capacity Building  Ensure Efficiency  Requires the right balance between coordinated & programme-specific elements

  7. „freestyle“-ongoing evaluation – the case Carinthia 4. Objective 2-programme Carinthia 2000-2006 Obj. 2 area: 260.000 inhabitans Budget: € 88. Mio. EU, 460 Mio. total 3 Priorities:1. investments and soft measures for industry and handcraft 2. investments and soft measures for tourism 3. training and qualification for skilled workers 7 measures Implementation: MA KWF Carinthian Economic Promotion Fund responsible public bodies for each measure

  8. „freestyle“-ongoing evaluation – the case Carinthia • 5. Ongoing evaluation - theory • Ongoing consultancy for the MA and implementing bodies • to monitor organisation, • to adapt present measures, • to develop new approaches to find new and better projects • to accompany the process of implementation • with • external expert team • working groups for specific topics • reports

  9. „freestyle“-ongoing evaluation – the case Carinthia • 6. Ongoing evaluation - Experience •  process has to be planned and agreed by all partners •  linkage to mid-term-evaluation essential •  external view gives new aspects and other examples •  continuous process brings you back on the track •  more costs and more effort

  10. Thank you for your attention! Andreas Maier Austrian Conference of Spatial Planning (ÖROK) www.oerok.gv.at Tel.:0043-1-535 34 44-19 Reinhard Schinner KWF – Carinthian Economic Promotion Fund www.kwf.at Tel.: 0043-463-55800-23

More Related