Journal club
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
Sponsored Links
1 / 32

Journal Club PowerPoint PPT Presentation

  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

Journal Club. Bazzano LA, Hu T, Reynolds K, Yao L, Bunol C, Liu Y, Chen CS, Klag MJ, Whelton PK, He J. Effects of low-carbohydrate and low-fat diets: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med. 2014 Sep 2;161(5):309-18. doi : 10.7326/M14-0180.

Download Presentation

Journal Club

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript

Journal club

Journal Club

Bazzano LA, Hu T, Reynolds K, Yao L, Bunol C, Liu Y, Chen CS, Klag MJ, Whelton PK, He J.

Effects of low-carbohydrate and low-fat diets: a randomized trial.

Ann Intern Med. 2014 Sep 2;161(5):309-18. doi: 10.7326/M14-0180.

Johnston BC1, Kanters S2, Bandayrel K3, Wu P4, Naji F5, Siemieniuk RA6, Ball GD7, Busse JW8, Thorlund K9, Guyatt G10, Jansen JP11, Mills EJ12.

Comparison of weight loss among named diet programs in overweight and obese adults: a meta-analysis.

JAMA. 2014 Sep 3;312(9):923-33. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.10397.

埼玉医科大学 総合医療センター 内分泌・糖尿病内科

Department of Endocrinology and Diabetes,

Saitama Medical Center, Saitama Medical University

松田 昌文 

Matsuda, Masafumi


8階 医局

Journal club









200 g/日

Plasma Glucose

Blood Glucose










Journal club

ブドウ糖とは?    ヒトの脳の唯一のエネルギー源

MANN, F. C., and MAGATH, T. B. (1922).-Arch. Intern. Moo. 30: 171.

検査値としての血糖は plasma glucose: PG (mg of glucose per dl of plasma)で表記されます。


ブドウ糖120g = 糖質108g

Journal club

Original ArticleWeight Loss with a Low-Carbohydrate, Mediterranean, or Low-Fat Diet

Israel, Germany, Boston

Iris Shai, R.D., Ph.D., Dan Schwarzfuchs, M.D., Yaakov Henkin, M.D., Danit R. Shahar, R.D., Ph.D., Shula Witkow, R.D., M.P.H., Ilana Greenberg, R.D., M.P.H., Rachel Golan, R.D., M.P.H., Drora Fraser, Ph.D., ArkadyBolotin, Ph.D., HilelVardi, M.Sc., OsnatTangi-Rozental, B.A., Rachel Zuk-Ramot, R.N., Benjamin Sarusi, M.Sc., DovBrickner, M.D., Ziva Schwartz, M.D., EinatSheiner, M.D., Rachel Marko, M.Sc., Esther Katorza, M.Sc., Joachim Thiery, M.D., Georg Martin Fiedler, M.D., Matthias Blüher, M.D., Michael Stumvoll, M.D., Meir J. Stampfer, M.D., Dr.P.H., for the Dietary Intervention Randomized Controlled Trial (DIRECT) Group

In this 2-year trial, we randomly assigned 322 moderately obese subjects (mean age, 52 years; mean body-mass index [the weight in kilograms divided by the square of the height in meters], 31; male sex, 86%) to one of three diets: low-fat, restricted-calorie; Mediterranean, restricted-calorie; or low-carbohydrate, non–restricted-calorie.

Shai I et al. N Engl J Med 2008;359:229-241

Journal club

Weight Changes during 2 Years According to Diet Group

Shai I et al. N Engl J Med 2008;359:229-241

Journal club

Difference in Mean Weight Loss Across Diets

With 95%Credible Intervals

The values above the named diets (blue boxes) correspond to the difference in mean weight lost between the columns and row at 12 months (eg, the difference in average weight lost between the Ornish diet and no diet at 12 months is 6.55 kg). The values below the diet classes correspond to the difference in mean weight lost between the row and the column at 6 months (eg, the difference in average weight lost between the Ornish diet and no diet at 6 months is 9.03 kg). LEARN indicates Lifestyle, Exercise, Attitudes, Relationships, and Nutrition.

JAMA. 2014;312(9):923-933.

Journal club


1) 糖尿病における炭水化物*摂取について


2) 栄養素摂取比率について

糖尿病における三大栄養素の推奨摂取比率は、一般的には、炭水化物50~60%(150g以上)、タンパク質20%以下のこりを脂質(上限25%)とする。 1日1000kcal以上


Journal club

Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana; Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, California; and Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland.

Ann Intern Med. 2014;161(5):309-318. doi:10.7326/M14-0180

Journal club

Background: Low-carbohydrate diets are popular for weight loss, but their cardiovascular effects have not been well-studied, particularly in diverse populations.

Objective: To examine the effects of a low-carbohydrate diet compared with a low-fat diet on body weight and cardiovascular risk factors.

Journal club

Design: A randomized, parallel-group trial. ( NCT00609271)

Setting: A large academic medical center.

Participants: 148 men and women without clinical cardiovascular disease and diabetes.

Intervention: A low-carbohydrate (<40 g/d) or low-fat (<30% of daily energy intake from total fat [<7% saturated fat]) diet. Both groups received dietary counseling at regular intervals throughout the trial.

Measurements: Data on weight, cardiovascular risk factors, and dietary composition were collected at 0, 3, 6, and 12 months.

Journal club

Figure 1. Study flow diagram.

* 5 participants in the low-fat group and 6 in the low-carbohydrate group had no data on body weight at randomization.

Journal club

Results:Sixty participants (82%) in the low-fat group and 59 (79%) in the low-carbohydrate group completed the intervention. At 12 months, participants on the low-carbohydrate diet had greater decreases in weight (mean difference in change, −3.5 kg [95% CI, −5.6 to −1.4 kg]; P = 0.002), fat mass (mean difference in change, −1.5% [CI, −2.6% to −0.4%]; P = 0.011), ratio of total–high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol (mean difference in change, −0.44 [CI, −0.71 to −0.16]; P = 0.002), and triglyceride level (mean difference in change, −0.16 mmol/L [−14.1 mg/dL] [CI, −0.31 to −0.01 mmol/L {−27.4 to −0.8 mg/dL}]; P = 0.038) and greater increases in HDL cholesterol level (mean difference in change, 0.18 mmol/L [7.0 mg/dL] [CI, 0.08 to 0.28 mmol/L {3.0 to 11.0 mg/dL}]; P < 0.001) than those on the low-fat diet.

Journal club

Limitation: Lack of clinical cardiovascular disease end points.

Conclusion: The low-carbohydrate diet was more effective for weight loss and cardiovascular risk factor reduction than the low-fat diet. Restricting carbohydrate may be an option for persons seeking to lose weight and reduce cardiovascular risk factors.

Primary Funding Source: National Institutes of Health.

Journal club




Journal club

1Hospital for Sick Children Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada 2Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada 3Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada 4Department of Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada 5School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada 6Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada 7Redwood Outcomes, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada 8Michael G. DeGroote School of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada 9Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada 10Department of Pediatrics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada 11Department of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada 12Michael G. DeGroote Institute for Pain Research and Care, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada 13Department of Anesthesia, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada 14Stanford Prevention Research Center, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California 15Department of Public Health and Community Medicine, Tufts University, Boston, Massachusetts

JAMA. 2014;312(9):923-933. doi:10.1001/jama.2014.10397.

Journal club

ImportanceMany claims have been made regarding the superiority of one diet or another for inducing weight loss. Which diet is best remains unclear.

Objective To determine weight loss outcomes for popular diets based on diet class (macronutrient composition) and named diet.

Journal club

Data Sources Search of 6 electronic databases: AMED, CDSR, CENTRAL, CINAHL, EMBASE, and MEDLINE from inception of each database to April 2014.

Study Selection Overweight or obese adults (body mass index ≥25) randomized to a popular self-administered named diet and reporting weight or body mass index data at 3-month follow-up or longer.

Data Extraction and Synthesis Two reviewers independently extracted data on populations, interventions, outcomes, risk of bias, and quality of evidence. A Bayesian framework was used to perform a series of random-effects network meta-analyses with meta-regression to estimate the relative effectiveness of diet classes and programs for change in weight and body mass index from baseline. Our analyses adjusted for behavioral support and exercise.

Main Outcomes and Measures Weight loss and body mass index at 6- and 12-month follow-up (±3 months for both periods).

Journal club

Results Among 59 eligible articles reporting 48 unique randomized trials (including 7286 individuals) and compared with no diet, the largest weight loss was associated with low-carbohydrate diets (8.73 kg [95% credible interval {CI}, 7.27 to 10.20 kg] at 6-month follow-up and 7.25 kg [95% CI, 5.33 to 9.25 kg] at 12-month follow-up) and low-fat diets (7.99 kg [95% CI, 6.01 to 9.92 kg] at 6-month follow-up and 7.27 kg [95% CI, 5.26 to 9.34 kg] at 12-month follow-up). Weight loss differences between individual diets were minimal. For example, the Atkins diet resulted in a 1.71 kg greater weight loss than the Zone diet at 6-month follow-up. Between 6- and 12-month follow-up, the influence of behavioral support (3.23 kg [95% CI, 2.23 to 4.23 kg] at 6-month follow-up vs 1.08 kg [95% CI, −1.82 to 3.96 kg] at 12-month follow-up) and exercise (0.64 kg [95% CI, −0.35 to 1.66 kg] vs 2.13 kg [95% CI, 0.43 to 3.85 kg], respectively) on weight loss differed.

Journal club

Conclusions and Relevance Significant weight loss was observed with any low-carbohydrate or low-fat diet. Weight loss differences between individual named diets were small. This supports the practice of recommending any diet that a patient will adhere to in order to lose weight.

Journal club




  • Login