1 / 26

The Clinical Perspective

The Clinical Perspective. Kerry Seitz Educator in Clinical Genetics & Principal Genetic Counsellor. The Clinical Perspective. The clinical genetics service Role of Clinical Genetics Service Role of Genetic Counsellor Types of Patients Seen Referral Sources to Clinical Genetics

wardah
Download Presentation

The Clinical Perspective

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. The Clinical Perspective Kerry Seitz Educator in Clinical Genetics & Principal Genetic Counsellor

  2. The Clinical Perspective • The clinical genetics service • Role of Clinical Genetics Service • Role of Genetic Counsellor • Types of Patients Seen • Referral Sources to Clinical Genetics • Predictive Testing • Genetic testing in Children • Case studies.

  3. The Clinical Genetics Service Involves close collaboration between: • Clinical Genetics service • Cytogenetics laboratories • Molecular Genetics laboratories • Other medical departments & colleagues, including primary, secondary and tertiary care. Note: These can be local or national, even international collaborations.

  4. Role of Clinical Genetics • To diagnose/confirm a genetic condition • To assess referred patients’ & relatives’ level of risk of a genetic condition • To provide required information • To provide psychological support • To make recommendations re. surveillance • To make referrals to the MDT for management and treatment.

  5. Role of Genetic Counsellor • Establish contact with the patient/family • Obtain medical history & family history • Identify issues important to individual/ family • Facilitate non-directive genetic counselling • Provide information autonomously or in conjunction with Geneticist • Provide support, including L/T contact –as needed. Aim: To enable those who seek information to reach their own fully informed decisions.

  6. Referral Sources • GPs • Paediatricians • Midwives, Obstetricians & Gynaecologists • Oncologists & Cancer FH Clinics • Neurologists • Orthopaedics, Dermatologists, ENT • Genetic Laboratories & other Clinical Genetic departments.

  7. Types of Patients Seen • Those with a family history of a genetic condition. • Those who have a suspected genetic condition themselves. • Those with a strong family history of cancer. • Pregnant couples/women. • Children with multiple problems (eg. dysmorphism, developmental delay, learning difficulties).

  8. Predictive and Presymptomatic TestingThis is usually carried out when a patient is at 25% or 50% risk of having inherited the familial mutation.

  9. Rationale for Performing Predictive Testing • To remove uncertainty. • To obtain clarification of gene status (ie. Gene change carrier/non-carrier). • To ensure appropriate screening is arranged (ie. if gene change carrier). • To obtain clarification of risks to children. • To provide information to help decision making in family planning. • To psychologically prepare for the onset of disease, or the possibility thereof. • To aid decision making in career choice.

  10. How Predictive Testing is Undertaken • A guideline or protocol is used (eg HD protocol). • The condition is verified in an affected relative, and confirmation of genetic test result is obtained. • A patient is seen 1-2 times prior to testing, to discuss the full range of implications and explore feelings wrt potential outcome. • Further appointment for discussion and obtaining blood sample. • Sample if sent to the lab & DNA extracted. • Genetic test is performed and results given in person.

  11. Implications of Predictive Testing • Genetic status is confirmed (uncertainty removed). • Risk is clarified in relatives, who can then have testing. • Psychological impact of testing positive – adjustment. • Psychological impact of testing negative: ’survivor guilt’. • Psychological burden of awaiting the onset of disease. • Impact on family dynamics – altered relationships. • Financial – Impact on employment/career opportunities - Impact on insurance cover/discrimination. • Social – Potential for discrimination and stigmatization.

  12. Predictive Testing for HD • Can be offered to adults at 50% or 25% risk of developing HD. • Possible contraindications: • mental illness • significant risk of suicide • ongoing pregnancy. • ~30-35% of individuals withdraw after counselling. • 1% risk of ‘catastrophic events’: • Suicide • Attempted suicide • Psychiatric hospitalization.

  13. HD Predictive Testing Protocol Referral First Contact (GC) Psychological/ Mental health/ Neurological concerns Continue Withdraw Second Contact Referral to Appropriate Professional Continue Appointment for Testing Continue Appointment for Results Follow up

  14. Ethics of Genetic Testing in Children General Principles: • Benefits should outweigh the harm - avoid testing where not so. • Testing should be left until the child is old enough to make his/her autonomous & informed decision. • Genetic testing done only if in child’s best interest. • Those performing testing should be the child’s advocate.

  15. Genetic Testing in Children Inappropriate testing: • Testing <12yrs is not justified where there are no clear benefits. • Testing for adult onset disorders (or predictive/ presymptomatic testing) - ie. if child is healthy & no treatment is required.

  16. Genetic Testing in Children Predictive/presymptomatic testing:- • Onlyadvocated in diseases which have a childhood onset – eg. FAP. • NOT advocated in those of adult onset – eg. HD.

  17. Genetic Testing in Children Appropriate testing: • Disorders of childhood onset • Disorders where early treatment is advocated & available - eg. CF, PKU, haemoglobinopathies. • Disorders where early screening is advocated - eg. FAP.

  18. Attitudes to Genetic Testing in Children Parents’ Reasons for wanting their child tested:- • Avoid the worry of uncertainty. • Being able to support children by providing information they are seeking. • Helping prepare for the future. • Avoiding resentment from children in later life. • Encouraging vigilance about preventative screening • Using available technology. • Parents have ‘the right’ to decide.

  19. Dilemmas in Childhood Genetic Testing Arise when:- • Parents pressure clinicians to test (inappropriate testing). • Child’s wishes contradict parents’ wishes. • Confidentiality concerns - esp if extended family want child’s information. • Children can give consent if ‘Gillick competent’.

  20. Psychosocial Impact of Genetic Testing • Possible long term psychological harm. - Incl. Anxiety, guilt, depression. • Unpredictability of genetic disease. • Possible impact on family relationships. • Removal of child’s autonomy - wrt decision making. • Removal of child’s “right not to know”.

  21. Case Study 1: Duchenne MD Family Paul Jane Cheryl Fred Matt

  22. Case Study 1: Duchenne Family • 3 year old boy with difficulty climbing stairs. • Referred to Paediatrician by Health Visitor. • S/B Paediatrician who took blood sample for creatinine kinase & DMD analysis. - Note: Parentsunaware of test. • Paediatrician referred child to Paed Neurologist with positive DMD results - (without disclosing results to parents).

  23. Case Study 1: Duchenne Family • Parents s/b Paed Neurologist who gave parents these results. • Parents shocked & devastated by unexpected news. • Parents had a second son, aged 6 months when original test performed. • Child subsequently referred to Clinical Genetics once s/b Paed Neurologist. • Parents s/b myself & subsequently by Geneticist.

  24. Parents’ Responses to Child’s Diagnosis Outcome: • Parents required a lot of counselling input. -Are continuing to come to terms with diagnoses. • Mother tested positive for DMD carrier status. • Second son tested positive for DMD. • Parents decided against extending their family further. • Are moving to a bungalow and planning adaptions to allow for disabled access.

  25. Case Study 2: Ullrich’s MD Family • Pakistani couple referred in for:- 1. Genetic confirmation of their daughters’ diagnosis of Ullrich’s muscular dystrophy. 2. Prenatal diagnosis (PND) for subsequent pregnancy. Note: No testing performed previously in extended family in Pakistan, hence familial mutation unknown and linkage analysis required.

  26. Case Study 2: Ullrich’s MD Family Challenges faced in this counselling situation: 1. Language barrier - limited English spoken by father, none by mother [Interpreter used]. 2. Cultural norms – father stated that men: a. ‘tell the women what they need to know’ b. ‘know what is good for their wives & family’ c. ‘make the decisions in society & in the family’. 3. Patient autonomy concerns - father spoke for his wife. 4. Complex genetic diagnosis.

More Related