1 / 9

Perspectives and possibilities in the power market Norwegian Nordic Power Market

Perspectives and possibilities in the power market Norwegian Nordic Power Market. Ole Gabrielsen. Present situation. Balanced power market Balanced : supply ≈ demand Dominated by hydro and nuclear ( appr 90 %) Norwegian supply : 85-140 TWh / year

waneta
Download Presentation

Perspectives and possibilities in the power market Norwegian Nordic Power Market

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Perspectives and possibilities in thepower market Norwegian Nordic Power Market • Ole Gabrielsen

  2. Present situation • Balancedpower market • Balanced: supply ≈ demand • Dominated by hydro and nuclear (appr 90 %) • Norwegian supply: 85-140 TWh/year • Rathergoodinterconnection-capacity • Short term: weatherthe most important price-driver • temperature, precipitation and wind • Long term trend: decliningprices • «Grey» Europe influencesthe Nordic market • Thermalproductioncost (coal) decisive for Nordic powerprices ! • Coalfiredpower plants and interconnections «balance» the Nordic Power market • Price collapse in emissions has decimatedalso Nordic powerprices

  3. Wherearewe heading?

  4. Supply • Swedish-Norwegian market for el-certifikates • To meetEU’sdemandfor 67,5 % renewables (of total energyconsumption) within 2020 • Goal: 26 TWh(10 % of present supply) newrenewableswithin 2020 • Norwegian investments : appr 50 billion mrdr NOK • Pressure in thevendor market • Sponsored by theconsumers • All consumersobliged to buycertificates • Project income: power + certificates • The priceofcertificates have to be highenough to realizetheneededinvestments • New nuclearpower plant in Finland 2016 : 13 TWh • Extensionofcapacity in existingSwedishnuclears +15 %

  5. Demand • Demand: status quo (+) • Considerabledecline in industrialcomsumptionafterfinancalcrisis 2008 • 15 % decline in Norwegian power intensive industry • Shutdownsofcapacity in Swedish / Finnish paper and pulp industry • Still ongoing (Sødra, Stora Enso) • Politicalpressure for reducedconsumptionofelectricity • Buildingregulations: reluctant to electricheating • Energy efficienicy :EU-goal 20 % improvementwithin 2020 • Upsides • Growth in population, electrificationoftransportationand off-shore, newindustry

  6. Energy balance • How largesurplus ? NB: Prisavhengig produksjon (kull/gass) kommer i tillegg NB: Pricedependent supply (coal/gas) in addition

  7. How to utilizethesurplus(25-50 TWh or 10-20 %) ? • Pressureonpowerprices • More volatile prices • Renewables not regulated ! • El-vehicles: good, butminorimpact • 50 % of Norwegian vehicleselectrical = 3,5 TWh • Electrification offshore: good, butminorimpact • Utsira-høyden = 3 TWh • New powerintensive industry: good, butminorimpact • (Hydro Karmøy= 3 TWh) • Favourablepowerpricessufficient ? • Interconnectors: to come, buthowmany and how fast ? • Interconnectors more exchangethanexport • Exportca 60 % ofcapacity

  8. Opportunities for Norway • Norway: Green Battery for Europe • «Renewable -Europe» needbalancingpower • Norway canassist theunpredictablewind and solar • Norway withitshydro has theability, but dependent of more interconnectors • Installedcapacity in Norway is sufficient to offer balancingpower and potentialto invest in more capacity • Extension in existingpowerstations • New pump storagefacilities • Realistic potensial: another 10.000 MW

  9. Interconnectors is thekey • Do Norway catchthepossibility ? • Plannedinterconnectors • Ambitionsarereduced from 4 to 2 newinterconnectors • Germany 2018 • UK 2020 • Afterthat ?? • Long lasting project planning (10 years) • Monopoly for theGowernment • New legislation: Only Statnett is allowed to take part in interconnectors • Acceptable business models ? • One owneroftheinterconnector – anotherownerofthecapacity • EU in favourof spot to spot- exchange • Limited timeframe: How longwill Europe wait for Norway ? 2020 2016 2018 ??

More Related