Erik Jonsson School of Engineering
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
Sponsored Links
1 / 38

Erik Jonsson School of Engineering and Computer Science PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 53 Views
  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

Erik Jonsson School of Engineering and Computer Science. CS 4384 – 0 01. Automata Theory. http://www.utdallas.edu/~pervin. Thursday: Chapter Four. Tuesday 4-15-14. FEARLESS Engineering.

Download Presentation

Erik Jonsson School of Engineering and Computer Science

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


Erik jonsson school of engineering and computer science

Erik Jonsson School of Engineering

and Computer Science

CS 4384– 001

Automata Theory

http://www.utdallas.edu/~pervin

Thursday: Chapter Four

Tuesday4-15-14

FEARLESS Engineering


Erik jonsson school of engineering and computer science

A search of Albert Einstein's archived manuscripts last year turned up a draft of an early unpublished paper by the famed physicist that concluded, mistakenly, that new matter, such as stars and galaxies, would appear to fill the expanding universe. Einstein was attempting to make sense of Edwin Hubble's observation that the universe was expanding, but he made a mathematical error. When he discovered his mistake, he set aside the paper, which is now in a digital archive of his papers at the Hebrew University in Jerusalem. Waterford Institute of Technology physicist Cormac O'Raifeartaigh and colleagues found the paper while scouring the archive.


Examination ii

Examination II


Turing machines

Turing Machines

Effective Computability


Attempts to define effective computability

  • Turing Machine (Alan Turing, 1936)

  • Post Systems (Emil Post, 1936)

  • μ-recursive functions (Kurt Gödel)

  • λ-calculus (Alonzo Church, 1932)

  • Combinatory logic (Haskell B Curry, 1929)

Attempts to define effective computability


Alan matheson turing

Alan Matheson Turing


Erik jonsson school of engineering and computer science

Princeton Alumni Magazine


Turing machines1

As before, there are many slightly different – but equivalent – definitions of a Turing Machine.

Our (free) text starts out with a machine with k tapes! I don’t like that and nobody else does that. A one-tape machine is the appropriate way to start.

Turing Machines


Other differences

Our (free) text uses an input tape that is infinite in both directions as does our (free) JFLAP. Almost all beginning machines start with a “semi-infinite” tape, i.e., one that has a left beginning cell and unlimited cells to the right. It does not matter – just unusual.

Our (free) text allows the tape head to move either left (L) or right (R) along the input tape, but also allows it to not go to a different cell after a move (N). Most do not allow an “N” move (it does not matter – it’s just unusual).

Each text uses a different symbol for the “blank” character (and usually allows it to be written). Examples: ̺ , □, ʙ, Δ

Other differences


Definition

Definition


Definition1

Definition


Example

Example


Erik jonsson school of engineering and computer science

Palindrome


  • Login