1 / 17

Port Phillip and Westernport Catchment

Evaluating the effectiveness of agricultural management practices to reduce nutrient loads from farms in PPWP. Port Phillip and Westernport Catchment. Project Manager: Anja George (DPI) - Catchment and Agriculture Services -. Background.

vivek
Download Presentation

Port Phillip and Westernport Catchment

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Evaluating the effectiveness of agricultural management practices to reduce nutrient loads from farms in PPWP Port Phillip and Westernport Catchment Project Manager: Anja George (DPI) - Catchment and Agriculture Services -

  2. Background • Deteriorating water quality is a major threat to the waterways and bays of PPWP • In 2004, only 25% of the waterways were in good or very good condition. • 50% of the PPWP regions is utilised for agr. pursuits (4,500 enterprises, annual production value $1 billion ). • Agricultural land is a significant contributor of nutrients (nitrogen and phosphorus).

  3. What we ALREADY know... • Clear link between the way agricultural land is managed and nutrient export. • Nutrient export from some agr. pursuits is controlled through licensing, reducing nutrients from majority of land uses relies on BMP’s. • Appropriate management of agr. land through the adoption of BMP can reduce nutrient exports and minimise water quality impacts. • Ability to reduce nutrient exports varies from farm to farm, catchment to catchment, industry to industry. • Practices that are successful in one area may not be suitable for all farms or land uses in catchment.

  4. What we DON’T know... • To what extent can agri BMP’s be used to reduce TN and TP exports from farms to waterways in PPWP? • specific land uses and characteristics of PPWP (soils, rainfall) • Traditionally difficult to measure benefit of individual BMP’s on water quality • Research into nutrient export from agricultural land has focused predominantly on the paddock scale (very few at farm scale) AND not in PPWP. • Specific information on effectiveness of BMP’s in reducing N and P exports in PPWP is limited.

  5. What we NEED to know... For the major agricultural land uses in PPWP: • What are the agricultural sources of nutrients? • Transport pathways of nutrients from farms to waterways? • Catchment andEnvironmental factorsthat influence export? • Which BMP’s? (one, all, point, diffuse sources?) • Which land uses ? (eg. dairy, beef) • How? (feasibility, cost and implementation mechanisms )

  6. Project overview: • Aim: To evaluate the effectiveness of agricultural BMP’s to reduce nutrient (TN and TP) exports from farms to waterways. • Two year project (June 2005- June 2007). • Partnership between DPI CAS and PIRVic Soil and Water Platform • Working group (9 members-inter-agency, technical expertise) Information from this project will help land managers and catchment planners make informed decisions on management of agr. land for water quality protection.

  7. Working Group:

  8. Land uses Investigated • Project focuses on catchments and land uses that have been • identified as key sources of Nitrogen and Phosphorus in PPWP: • Dairy (Westernport) • Beef (Westernport) • Strawberry (representative of annual horticulture) (PP- Yarra)

  9. Methodology • 2 sections: • Bayesian Network Model development • Model application and demonstration (Scenario testing)

  10. Part 1: Bayesian Network Models • Development of 5 Bayesian Networks Models (TN and TP): • 2 x Dairy • 1 x Beef • 2 x Annual horticulture (Strawberry) Bayesian Network Models: • Describe cause and effect of management decisions on outcomes • Incorporate qualitative and quantitative information from all levels (farmers, industry, agency, scientists etc..) thereby reducing uncertainty. • Calculates consequence of agri. management practices by determining probability (%) of small, medium and large TP/TN load under different management scenarios and landscape characteristics • Limitations (What it can’t do!): • Give absolute numbers on nutrient export loads (ie. t/ha/yr). This is presented in probability (%). • Model at farm scale (not catchment). Scenario are used to test and demonstrate wider industry/catchment /regional application.

  11. HYDROLOGY DIFFUSE SOURCES POINT SOURCES LOAD OUTPUTS Probability of TP load from Dairy farm

  12. Example: Diffuse TP load (Dairy)

  13. Model Applications • Scenario Testing: • To demonstrate how changes in climate, landscape factors (eg. soil types, rainfall, slope) and management practices (eg. effluent and fertiliser management) can influence TN and TP export.

  14. Probability of nutrient loads Direction and magnitude of change in nutrient load to compare scenarios

  15. Where to from here? • Assessment of results • What do these results mean for: • Farmers? • Land use and agri industry (ie. dairy)? • Management of agricultural land in catchment? • Broader application/PPWP/BBW Strategy? • Future Implementation mechanisms? • Knowledge and research gaps (R and D requirements)? • Final Project report due: June 2007.

  16. Thank You • Anja George • Department of Primary Industries • Woori Yallock • Ph: (03) 5954 4001 • anja.george@dpi.vic.gov.au

More Related