PHY CRG Report
Download
1 / 10

D2.2 Comment Summary - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 66 Views
  • Uploaded on

PHY CRG Report May [email protected] Montreal, Quebec Harry Peng: technical editor Rhett Brikovskis: section editor. D2.2 Comment Summary. Clause 7: total 45 29 technical binding 5 technical non-binding 11 editorial Annex B: total 71 60 technical binding 3 technical non-binding 8 editorial

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about ' D2.2 Comment Summary ' - viveca


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
PHY CRG ReportMay [email protected] Montreal, Quebec Harry Peng: technical editorRhett Brikovskis: section editor

P802.17D2.1 CRG


D2 2 comment summary
D2.2 Comment Summary

  • Clause 7: total 45

    • 29 technical binding

    • 5 technical non-binding

    • 11 editorial

  • Annex B: total 71

    • 60 technical binding

    • 3 technical non-binding

    • 8 editorial

  • Annex C: total 168

    • 146 technical binding

    • 1 technical non-binding

    • 21 editorial

  • Grand total = 284, 244 technical

  • Addressed all technical and technical non-binding comments

    • Rejected:

      • 0

  • Punt status: total 2

    • #414 and #1087

P802.17D2.1 CRG


Clause 7 highlights
Clause 7 Highlights

  • Addressed all technical comments

    • Unsaintly words

    • PICS

    • Lots of formatting issues

    • 3 editor’s notes

      • All addressed

    • Official SAPI value for LAPS

      • Value is FE0316

    • SONET rates

  • Punt to WG #414

P802.17D2.1 CRG


Annex b highlights
Annex B Highlights

  • Addressed all technical comments

    • Unsaintly words

    • PICS

    • Lots of formatting issues highlighted

    • 6 editor’s notes

      • Editor’s note summary at the end of the report

      • All addressed

    • Signal_Fail and Signal_Degrade interface moved out of GMII/XGMII block

  • Punt to WG of #1087

P802.17D2.1 CRG


Annex c highlight
Annex C Highlight

  • Addressed all technical comments

    • Management interface for signal_fail and signal_degrade no needed: clause C.1.4.3.1 comment # 1170

    • PICS

    • Lots and lots of formatting issues highlighted

    • 4 editor’s notes

      • Editor’s note summary at the end of the report

      • All addressed

P802.17D2.1 CRG


Editor s notes clause 7
Editor’s Notes Clause 7:

  • p.161 line 1

    • Revision History:

  • p.169 line 42 (comment #451 [RL] )

    • A SAPI value of FE0316is proposed, but is subject to approval by ITU-T SG-17.

    • To be deleted

  • p. 171 line line 4

    • “This PICS proforma is at present incomplete...”

P802.17D2.1 CRG


Editor s notes clause b
Editor’s Notes Clause B:

  • p.337 line 8

    • Revision History:

  • p.337 line 27 (comment # 1083 [RL])

    • Receive state machine for GERS and XGERS

    • To be deleted

  • p.339 line 6 (comment # 1094 [RL] )

    • Draft 1.0 comment #425 requests that each RS specify a “LINK_RATE” value. However, it is unclear if this is intended to correspond to the line rate, nominal data rate, or other rate. The resolution to Draft 1.0 comment #345 asks the rate ad-hoc to consider these issues before new text is added to the annexes.

    • To be deleted

  • p.343 line 39

    • “10 Gigabit LAN and WAN PHYs operate at different data rates. An RPR MAC management variable (to be defined) is used to select the appropriate data rate.”

    • To be deleted as the RS is rate independent

  • p.344 line 45 : similar to comment #1094 )

    • Draft 1.0 comment #425 requests that each RS specify a “LINK_RATE” value. However, it is unclear if this is intended to correspond to the line rate, nominal data rate, or other rate. The resolution to Draft 1.0comment #345 asks the rate ad-hoc to consider these issues before new text is added to the annexes.

    • To be deleted

  • p. 351 line line 4

    • This PICS proforma is at present incomplete...

P802.17D2.1 CRG


Editor s notes clause c
Editor’s Notes Clause C:

  • p.355 line 8

    • Revision History:

  • p.337 line 27 (comment # 1154 [RL] )

    • Receive state machine for GRS and SRS…

    • To be deleted

  • p.358 line 16 (comment # 1170 [RL] )

    • Coordinate with Layer Management section. Regarding MDSF and MDSD…

    • To be deleted

  • p. 351 line line 4

    • This PICS proforma is at present incomplete...

P802.17D2.1 CRG


Wg task
WG task

  • Punt comments

    • #414 and #1087

    • Kway teow PHY nee Wet noodle PHY

P802.17D2.1 CRG


Editorial comments
Editorial Comments

  • Will request for editorial license to address editorial comments.

P802.17D2.1 CRG


ad