1 / 31

Summary of Work

Milan L. Mašanović, Vikrant Lal, Jonathon S. Barton, Erik J. Skogen, Daniel J. Blumenthal, Larry A. Coldren. Monolithically Integrated Mach-Zehnder Interferometer Wavelength Converter and Widely-Tunable Laser in InP. Summary of Work. Objective/scope

Download Presentation

Summary of Work

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Milan L. Mašanović, Vikrant Lal, Jonathon S. Barton,Erik J. Skogen, Daniel J. Blumenthal, Larry A. Coldren Monolithically Integrated Mach-Zehnder Interferometer Wavelength Converter and Widely-Tunable Laser in InP

  2. Summary of Work • Objective/scope • Demonstrate InP monolithic integration of a widely tunable laser and all-optical wavelength converter for digital and analog wavelength conversion. • Approach • Utilize a common offset quantum well integration platform and a combination of passive, active and filter waveguides to implement on a single chip a Mach-Zehnder SOA Interferometer and widely tunable SGDBR laser. • Major accomplishments • Demonstration and testing of world’s first monolithically integrated tunable laser and AO wavelength converter • Wide conversion range: 50+nm in, 22nm (L-Band) • 2.5GB/s error free operation • Issues • SGDBR on-chip output power and mirrors • Passive waveguide losses, chip insertion losses • SOA speed (gain recovery) • C-Band operation

  3. Monolithically Integrated InP AOTWC Sampled Grating DBR Laser Mach-Zehnder Interferometer Input Amplifier

  4. Integration Challenges • Enable a Common Fabrication Platform • Offset Quantum Wells • Tradeoffs Between Laser and MZI Performance • Optical Isolation • Lasers Highly Sensitive to Coherent Reflections • Active/Passive Interfaces • Amplified Reflections • Facet Reflections Need to be Suppressed Effectively (10-5 or better) • Processing Issues • Material Quality - Uniformity • Processing Uniformity - Very Long Devices

  5. Front Mirror Gain Phase Rear Mirror Offset QW Device SGDBR Laser Background • 4 Section Device • Wide Tunability, High Power • Suitable for Integration • Passive – Active Waveguide Combination • Does not Require Facet Reflection to Lase • Realized in Several Integration Platforms(*) • Offset Quantum Wells • Burried Ridge Stripe (OQW, QWI) *Beck Mason, Erik Skogen, Larry Coldren

  6. Transfer Function SOA Current Optical Power Cross-Phase Modulation Principle π phase shift No CW light out CW in • Semiconductor optical amplifiers used to achieve  phase shift • Incoming data disturbs phase balance  data conversion π phase shift Data in Converted Signal Out CW in Inverting Operation Non Inverting Operation Interferometer - Cross Phase Modulation

  7. 1- 1x2 MMI Splitter/Combiner 1- 1x2 MMI Splitter/Combiner 2- 2x2 MMI Coupler 2- S Bend 3 - MQW SOA 3 - MQW SOA 3 2 2 1 1 2 3 1 1 1 2 2 3 Generation I Interferometer Designs • Two different interferometer realizations • MMI/S Bend Design • 2 Stage MMI Design

  8. 1515 nm 1545 nm 1575 nm MMI Components • Function • N*N power splitting/coupling • Most common components: • 1x2, 2x1 splitter/combiner • 2x2 (3dB) coupler • Properties • Simple Structure and Fabrication • Low Inherent Loss • Large Bandwidth • Low Polarization Dependence

  9. Width Taper 7° Angle 5 µm Facet Reflections • Depending on the SOA Gain, Maximum Tolerable Reflection R=0.251.25 10-4 • Optimized Output Waveguide Required • Multilayer (3) AR Coating

  10. Thermal Consideration – Interferometer Design • Thermal Crosstalk • Affects power/gain/dynamics • 80 μm SOA Spacing • Tradeoff between device length and temperature effects

  11. Epitaxial Heterostructure

  12. Active – Passive Removal Grating Formation InP/InGaAs Regrowth Metalization/Anneal Passivation/Implant Ridge Etch Offset Quantum Well Process Most Mature SGDBR Fabrication Technology Requires Single MOCVD Regrowth

  13. Actual Device Layout (Active and Ridge Layer Shown) Active Regions Critical Steps - Verification • Active Regions Removal PL Line Scan • Gratings Etch AFM Scan  

  14. 5 um First Generation Tunable Wavelength Converter

  15. Gain Bandwidth and Tuning Range Gain Peak – 1560nm Tuning Range – 22nm

  16. Mirror Design • Mirror • Carrier Injection Cause for Index Change (7nm) • Gen 1 Mirror • Patchy Band Coverage • Irregular Supermode Tuning • Grating pitch – L-band lasers • Gen 2 Mirror • Problem Fixed

  17. Electrical/Optical Control Optical Control Electrical Control

  18. DC Extinction Map • Higher Extinction For low bias currents

  19. Difference in SOA Output Power Strongly Affects Extinction Keep Powers Equal in Both Branches and Change Phase Independently Power-Extinction Analysis

  20. SOA Phase Change of Pi Required High Speed Operation – Lower Index Change Extend the SOA Length Phase-Extinction Relation

  21. Back-to-back Data Gen. PC PC Device BPF EDFA BPF λin EOM λout BER EDFA BPF Attenuator PD Error Rate Pin Test Setup

  22. 2.5GB/s Conversion – Fixed SGDBR Wavelength 1535nm 1565nm Input Eye Diagram PRBS 231-1 1545nm 1575nm Converted Data 1585nm 1555nm

  23. 2.5GB/s Conversion – Fixed Input Wavelength Input Eye Diagram PRBS 231-1 1557nm 1566nm Converted Data 1578nm 1570nm

  24. 2.5GB/s Bit Error Rate Testing Fixed SGDBR Output Wavelength PRBS 231-1 Input ~2dB Power Penalty 2dB

  25. First Generation WC Performance Limits 5GB/s Eye λin=1590nm 2.5GB/s +4mW SGDBR Power Difference 1mW

  26. Mirror Design Tuning Range Low MZI Input Power (<0.8mW) Improve Electrical and Optical Extinction Improve conversion efficiency (input to output) Speed up Carrier Dynamics Summary of Issues to be Resolved

  27. Second Generation WC Design • Improvements • Redesigned Mirrors • Wider tuning range • Better ‘behavior’ • Output Coupler • Light Evacuation • Phase Control • Improved Extinction • Input SOAs • Boost Input Power • Reduce Lifetime • 1.4Q Waveguide • Higher Output Power

  28. Second Generation WC with TIR Mirror • TIR Mirror • Insertion Loss • ~200μm propagation • Distortion • No SOA at the input • SNR • Eliminated extra ASE

  29. Second Generation WC with TIR Mirror

  30. Requirements for High Speed Wavelength Conversion • Requirements • Small Optical Area • Large Confinement • High Differential Gain • Long Length • High Bias Current • Buried Ridge Stripe using QWI • Improved Confinement • Reduced Losses/Reflections • Reduced Heating

  31. Summary • Major accomplishments • Demonstration and testing of world’s first monolithically integrated tunable laser and AO wavelength converter • Wide conversion range: 50+nm in, 22nm (L-Band) • 2.5GB/s error free operation • Future Work • Fabricate Second Generation Devices • Analog Characterization for Gen I Devices • Compare Performance (Digital/Analog)

More Related