1 / 30

Civil Systems Planning Benefit/Cost Analysis

Civil Systems Planning Benefit/Cost Analysis. Scott Matthews Courses: 12-706 and 73-359 Lecture 4 - 9/13/2004. Qualitative CBA. If can’t quantify all costs and benefits Quantify as many as possible Make assumptions Estimate order of magnitude value of others

Download Presentation

Civil Systems Planning Benefit/Cost Analysis

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Civil Systems PlanningBenefit/Cost Analysis Scott Matthews Courses: 12-706 and 73-359 Lecture 4 - 9/13/2004

  2. Qualitative CBA • If can’t quantify all costs and benefits • Quantify as many as possible • Make assumptions • Estimate order of magnitude value of others • Make rough Net Benefits estimate 12-706 and 73-359

  3. Welfare EconomicsConcepts • Perfect Competition • Homogeneous goods. • No agent affects prices. • Perfect information. • No transaction costs /entry issues • No transportation costs. • No externalities: • Private benefits = social benefits. • Private costs = social costs. 12-706 and 73-359

  4. Price A B P* 0 1 2 3 4 Q* Quantity (Individual) Demand Curves • Downward Sloping is a result of diminishing marginal utility of each additional unit (also consider as WTP) • Presumes that at some point you have enough to make you happy and do not value additional units Actually an inverse demand curve (where P = f(Q) instead). 12-706 and 73-359

  5. Market Demand Price A A B B P* P* 0 1 2 3 4 Q 0 1 2 3 4 5 Q • If above graphs show two (groups of) consumer demands, what is social demand curve? 12-706 and 73-359

  6. Market Demand P* 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Q • Found by calculating the horizontal sum of individual demand curves • Market demand then measures ‘total consumer surplus of entire market’ 12-706 and 73-359

  7. Price A B P* 0 1 2 3 4 Q* Quantity Social WTP (i.e. market demand) • ‘Aggregate’ demand function: how all potential consumers in society value the good or service (i.e., someone willing to pay every price…) • This is the kind of demand curves we care about 12-706 and 73-359

  8. Price A B P* 0 1 2 3 4 Q* Quantity Total/Gross/User Benefits P1 • Benefits received are related to WTP - and approximated by the shaded rectangles • Approximated by whole area under demand: triangle AP*B + rectangle 0P*BQ* 12-706 and 73-359

  9. Price A B P* 0 1 2 3 4 Q* Quantity Benefits with WTP • Total/Gross/User Benefits = area under curve or willingness to pay for all people = Social WTP = their benefit from consuming = sum of all WTP values • Receive benefits from consuming this much regardless of how much they pay to get it 12-706 and 73-359

  10. Price A B P* 0 1 2 3 4 Q* Quantity Net Benefits A B • Amount ‘paid’ by society at Q* is P*, so total payment is B to receive (A+B) total benefit • Net benefits = (A+B) - B = A = consumer surplus (benefit received - price paid) 12-706 and 73-359

  11. Consumer Surplus Changes Price CS1 A P* B P1 0 1 2 Q* Q1 Quantity • New graph - assume CS1 is original consumer surplus at P*, Q* and price reduced to P1 • Changes in CS approximate WTP for policies 12-706 and 73-359

  12. Consumer Surplus Changes Price A CS2 P* B P1 0 1 2 Q* Q1 Quantity • CS2 is new cons. surplus as price decreases to (P1, Q1); consumers gain from lower price • Change in CS = P*ABP1 -> net benefits • Area : trapezoid = (1/2)(height)(sum of bases) 12-706 and 73-359

  13. Consumer Surplus Changes Price A CS2 P* B P1 0 1 2 Q* Q1 Quantity • Same thing in reverse. If original price is P1, then increase price moves back to CS1 12-706 and 73-359

  14. Consumer Surplus Changes Price A CS1 P* B P1 0 1 2 Q* Q1 Quantity • If original price is P1, then increase price moves back to CS1 - Trapezoid is loss in CS, negative net benefit 12-706 and 73-359

  15. Further Analysis Price Old NB: CS2 New NB: CS1 Change:P2ABP* A CS1 P2 B C P* 0 1 2 Q2 Q* Quantity • Assume price increase is because of tax • Tax is P2-P* per unit, tax revenue =(P2-P*)Q2 • Tax revenue is transfer from consumers to gov’t • To society overall , no effect • Pay taxes to gov’t, get same amount back • But we only get yellow part.. 12-706 and 73-359

  16. Deadweight Loss Price A CS1 P2 B P* 0 1 2 Q* Q1 Quantity • Yellow paid to gov’t as tax • Green is pure cost (no offsetting benefit) • Called deadweight loss • Consumers buy less than they would w/o tax (exceeds some people’s WTP!) - loss of CS • There will always be DWL when tax imposed 12-706 and 73-359

  17. Net Social Benefit Accounting • Change in CS: P2ABP* (loss) • Government Spending: P2ACP* (gain) • Gain because society gets it back • Net Benefit: Triangle ABC (loss) • Because we don’t get all of CS loss back • OR.. NSB= (-P2ABP*)+ P2ACP* = -ABC 12-706 and 73-359

  18. Commentary • It is trivial to do this math when demand curves, preferences, etc. are known. Without this information we have big problems. • Unfortunately, most of the ‘hard problems’ out there have unknown demand functions. • We need advanced methods to find demand 12-706 and 73-359

  19. First: Elasticities of Demand • Measurement of how “responsive” demand is to some change in price or income. • Slope of demand curve = Dp/Dq. • Elasticity of demand, e, is defined to be the percent change in quantity divided by the percent change in price. e = (p Dq) / (q Dp) 12-706 and 73-359

  20. P P Q Q Elasticities of Demand Elastic demand: e > 1. If P inc. by 1%, demand dec. by more than 1%. Unit elasticity: e = 1. If P inc. by 1%, demand dec. by 1%. Inelastic demand: e < 1 If P inc. by 1%, demand dec. by less than 1%. 12-706 and 73-359

  21. P P Q Q Elasticities of Demand Necessities, demand is Completely insensitive To price Perfectly Inelastic Perfectly Elastic A change in price causes Demand to go to zero (no easy examples) 12-706 and 73-359

  22. Elasticity - Some Formulas • Point elasticity = dq/dp * (p/q) • For linear curve, q = (p-a)/b so dq/dp = 1/b • Linear curve point elasticity =(1/b) *p/q = (1/b)*(a+bq)/q =(a/bq) + 1 12-706 and 73-359

  23. Maglev System Example • Maglev - downtown, tech center, UPMC, CMU • 20,000 riders per day forecast by developers. • Let’s assume price elasticity -0.3; linear demand; 20,000 riders at average fare of $ 1.20. Estimate Total Willingness to Pay. 12-706 and 73-359

  24. Example calculations • We have one point on demand curve: • 1.2 = a + b*(20,000) • We know an elasticity value: • elasticity for linear curve = 1 + a/bq • -0.3 = 1 + a/b*(20,000) • Solve with two simultaneous equations: • a = 5.2 • b = -0.0002 or 2.0 x 10^-4 12-706 and 73-359

  25. Demand Example (cont) • Maglev Demand Function: • p = 5.2 - 0.0002*q • Revenue: 1.2*20,000 = $ 24,000 per day • TWtP = Revenue + Consumer Surplus • TWtP = pq + (a-p)q/2 = 1.2*20,000 + (5.2-1.2)*20,000/2 = 24,000 + 40,000 = $ 64,000 per day. 12-706 and 73-359

  26. Change in Fare to $ 1.00 • From demand curve: 1.0 = 5.2 - 0.0002q, so q becomes 21,000. • Using elasticity: 16.7% fare change (1.2-1/1.2), so q would change by -0.3*16.7 = 5.001% to 21,002 (slightly different value) • Change to Revenue = 1*21,000 - 1.2*20,000 = 21,000 - 24,000 = -3,000. • Change CS = 0.5*(0.2)*(20,000+21,000)= 4,100 • Change to TWtP = (21,000-20,000)*1 + (1.2-1)*(21,000-20,000)/2 = 1,100. 12-706 and 73-359

  27. Estimating Linear Demand Functions • As above, sometimes we don’t know demand • Focus on demand (care more about CS) but can use similar methods to estimate costs (supply) • Ordinary least squares regression used • minimize the sum of squared deviations between estimated line and p,q observations: p = a + bq + e • Standard algorithms to compute parameter estimates - spreadsheets, Minitab, S, etc. • Estimates of uncertainty of estimates are obtained (based upon assumption of identically normally distributed error terms). • Can have multiple linear terms 12-706 and 73-359

  28. Log-linear Function • q = a(p)b(hh)c….. • Conditions: a positive, b negative, c positive,... • If q = a(p)b : Elasticity interesting = (dq/dp)*(p/q) = abp(b-1)*(p/q) = b*(apb/apb) = b. • Constant elasticity at all points. • Easiest way to estimate: linearize and use ordinary least squares regression (see Chap 12) • E.g., ln q = ln a + b ln(p) + c ln(hh) .. 12-706 and 73-359

  29. Log-linear Function • q = a*pb and taking log of each side gives: ln q = ln a + b ln p which can be re-written as q’ = a’ + b p’, linear in the parameters and amenable to OLS regression. • This violates error term assumptions of OLS regression. • Alternative is maximum likelihood - select parameters to max. chance of seeing obs. 12-706 and 73-359

  30. Maglev Log-Linear Function • q = a*pb - From above, b = -0.3, so if p = 1.2 and q = 20,000; so 20,000 = a*(1.2)-0.3 ; a = 21,124. • If p becomes 1.0 then q = 21,124*(1)-0.3 = 21,124. • Linear model - 21,000 • Remaining revenue, TWtP values similar but NOT EQUAL. 12-706 and 73-359

More Related