1 / 21

Axiomatic set theory

Axiomatic set theory. Jouko Väänänen. Every woset is isomorphic to an ordinal. Suppose (X, ) is a woset. Let E={aX : X a is isomorphic to an ordinal}. By Induction Principle and the previous theorem, E=X. By the previous theorem X is isomorphic to an ordinal. . The ordinal of a woset.

vinaya
Download Presentation

Axiomatic set theory

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Axiomatic set theory Jouko Väänänen Jouko Väänänen: Set theory

  2. Every woset is isomorphic to an ordinal • Suppose (X,) is a woset. • Let E={aX : Xa is isomorphic to an ordinal}. • By Induction Principle and the previous theorem, E=X. • By the previous theorem X is isomorphic to an ordinal. Jouko Väänänen: Set theory

  3. The ordinal of a woset • Every woset (X,) is isomorphic to a unique ordinal On(X) • Ordinals are well-ordered by  • , , ,  • ={ : <} Jouko Väänänen: Set theory

  4. Ordinals • 0= • 1={0} • 2={0,1} • 3={0,1,2} • … • n={0,1,…,n-1} Jouko Väänänen: Set theory

  5. Infinite ordinals • ={0,1,2,3,…,n,…} • {0,1,2,3,…,n,…, }= {} • Denote: {}= +1 • More generally: {}= +1 • Successor ordinals • {0,1,2,…,,+1,…} not a successor • Limit ordinal Jouko Väänänen: Set theory

  6. Transfinite sequences of sets • A sequence is a function f such that dom(f) is an ordinal. • f=x :< • f()= x • Special case xn :n<={xn} Jouko Väänänen: Set theory

  7. Paradoxes of naive set theory • Burali Forti Paradox: The collection of all ordinals is wellordered by . If it were a set, it would be the largest ordinal. But there is no largest ordinal. So what goes wrong? • Russell’s Paradox: Let R={x : xx}. We know that RR, because otherwise both RR and RR. Since RR, we have RR and RR, a contradiction. What went wrong? Jouko Väänänen: Set theory

  8. Reasons for axiomatization • Paradoxes arise from confusion of concepts. • By stating exact axioms and rules of derivation we can (try to) avoid confusions. • We present so called Zermelo-Fraenkel axiomatization of set theory • No paradoxes have been found in this. Jouko Väänänen: Set theory

  9. Language of set theory • We adopt the symbols: •  epsilon symbol • = identity symbol • ),( bracket symbols • vn variable symbols • wn constant symbols •  negation symbol •  disjunction symbol •  conjunction symbol •  universal quantifier symbol •  existential quantifier symbol Jouko Väänänen: Set theory

  10. Formulas of set theory • (tt’) where t is a variable symbol of a constant symbol • (t=t’) where t is a variable symbol of a constant symbol • () negation of formula  • () disjunction of formulas  and  • () conjunction of formulas  and  • (xn) universally quantified formula • (xn) existentially quantified formula Jouko Väänänen: Set theory

  11. Abbreviations • () abbreviates (()) • () abbreviates (() ()) • xy (z((zx)(zy))) • xy (xy (x=y)) • x={y} (z((zx)  (z=y))) • x={y,v} (z((zx)  ((z=y)(z=v))) Jouko Väänänen: Set theory

  12. Further abbreviations • Brackets are left out if it is obvious where they should be, so we write •      instead of ((  )  ) • Or instead of (  (  )) Jouko Väänänen: Set theory

  13. Intuitive universe of sets: The cumulative hierarchy • V0= • V+1= P(V) • V=<V for limit ordinals  V+1 V V0 Jouko Väänänen: Set theory

  14. Zermelo-Fraenkel Axioms ZFC • Axiom of Extensionality: If two sets have the same elements, they are equal • Null Set Axiom: There is a set  with no elements • Axiom of Infinity: There is a set x such that x and {a}x whenever ax. • Power Set Axiom: If x is a set, there is a set P(x) consisting of all subsets of x. • Axiom of Union: If x is a set, there is a set x consisting of all elements of elements of x. • Axiom of Replacement: Let (vn,vm) be a formula of the language of set theory such that for all a there is a unique b with (a,b). Let x be a set. Then there is a set y consisting of exactly the elements b for which (a,b) for some a in x. • Axiom of Subset Selection: Let (vn) be a formula of the language of set. Let x be a set. Then there is a set y consisting of exactly the elements a of x for which (a) holds. • Axiom of Foundation: If x is a set, then there is a in x such that ax=. • Axiom of Choice: If x is a set of pairwise disjoint non-empty sets, then there is a set y which contains exactly one element from each set in x. Jouko Väänänen: Set theory

  15. Axiom of Replacement b x (a,b) a y Jouko Väänänen: Set theory

  16. Axiom of Subset Selection x y (a) a Jouko Väänänen: Set theory

  17. Axiom of Foundation x a Jouko Väänänen: Set theory

  18. Axiom of Choice x y Jouko Väänänen: Set theory

  19. Classes and sets • Let (vn) be a formula of the language of set theory. • A={a : (a)} is called a class. • If (a), then a is called an element of the class A, denoted aA. • If a is a set, it is a class, a={x : xa}. • Some classes are not sets, e.g. {x:xx}, {x : x=x}, {x:x is a singleton}, etc . The are proper classes. Jouko Väänänen: Set theory

  20. Operations on classes • AB • AB • A-B • A x B • RA x B • F:AB • Injection, bijection Jouko Väänänen: Set theory

  21. Construction of the cumulative hierarchy • V0=, exists by the Null Set Axiom. • V+1= P(V), exists by the Power Set Axiom. • V=<V for limit ordinals , exists: Let A={V:<}. By Axiom of Replacement A exists. Now V=A. Jouko Väänänen: Set theory

More Related