The international guidelines network
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
Sponsored Links
1 / 15

The International Guidelines Network PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 80 Views
  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

The International Guidelines Network. Hans V. Hogerzeil, MD, PhD, FRCP Edin Essential Drugs and Medicines Policy WHO, Geneva ICIUM-2, March 2004. G-I-N Background.

Download Presentation

The International Guidelines Network

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


The international guidelines network

The InternationalGuidelines Network

Hans V. Hogerzeil, MD, PhD, FRCP Edin

Essential Drugs and Medicines Policy

WHO, Geneva

ICIUM-2, March 2004


The international guidelines network

G-I-NBackground

Council of Europe, 2001 recommended promoting international networking between organisations producing evidence-based health information.

June 2002; idea of an International Guidelines Network discussed at CPG 2002 Symposium in Berlin.

June - October 2002; working group of 11 organisations from 8 countries developed a draft constitution for The Guidelines International NetworkG-I-N.

November 2002;G-I-NFounding Committeeconsent on constitution and establish executive board.


The international guidelines network

Agency for Quality in Medicine ÄZQ, D

Association of Scientific Medical Societies AWMF, D

Basque Office for HTA OSTEBA, E

Belgian Center for Evidence based Medicine, B

Berlin Chamber of Physicians, D

Center for Health Policies and Services, ROM

Center for Reviews & Dissemination York, UK

Clinical Epidemiology Center Lausanne CepiC, CH

Danish Center for Evaluation and HTA DACEHTA, DK

Directorate for Health and Social Affairs, NO

Directorate for Health Iceland, ISL

Dutch Association of Comprehensive Cancer Centres, NL 

Dutch College of General Practitioners, NL

Dutch Institute for Healthcare Improvement CBO, NL

Estonian Health Insurcance Fund, EE

evidence.at -Austrian Ass.for Quality in Healthcare, A

Finnish Medical Society Duodecim, FIN

Finnish Office for HTA FINOHTA, FIN

Flemish College of General Practitioners WVVH, B

German Federal Institute for Quality Assurance, D

German Joint Federal Committee, D

HTA Unit, Ministry of Health Malaysia, MAL

Institute for Quality in Healthcare, POR

Italian Evidence-Based Medicine Group GIMBE, I

J.Briggs Inst.for Evid.Based Nursing&Midwifery, AUS

G-I-N

Organisational

Members

Josep Laporte Library Foundation, Barcelona, E

Nat.Agency for Accred., Eval in Healthcare ANAES, F

Nat. Board of Health and Welfare (Socialstyrelsen), S

National Federation of Cancer Research Centres, F

National Institute for Clinical Excellence NICE, UK

National Institute of Clinical Studies NICS, AUS

National Kidney Foundation, USA

New Zealand Accident Compensation Corporation ACC, NZ

New Zealand Guidelines Group NZGG, NZ

Polish Institute for EbM, PL

Program in Evidence-based Care, Cancer Care Ontario, CDN

Regional Health Agency Emilia-Romagna, I

Royal College of Nursing Institute, UK

Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland RCSI, IRL

Royal Dutch Ass. of Physiotherapy KNGF, NL

Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network SIGN, UK

Slovene Guidelines Group, SLO

Sowerby Centre for Health Informatics at Newcastle, UK

Spanish Network for Research on Guidelines, E

Swiss Medical Association FMH, CH

The AGREE Collaboration, INT

TRIMBOS Institute, NL

Turkish MoH – School of Public Health (TR)

U.S.Agency for Health Research & Quality AHRQ, USA

World Health Organisation Geneva WHO, INT

50 Organisations

26 countries

(March 2004)


The international guidelines network

Mission Statement

“G.I.N.

seeks to improve the quality of health care by promoting systematic development of clinical practice guidelines and their application into practice, through supporting international collaboration.”


G i n goals

G-I-N Goals

  • Information sharing, knowledge transfer, collaborative working

  • Improvement, harmonisation of methodologies for CPG development, dissemination, implementation, evaluation

  • Support of research

  • Coordination with other health care quality initiatives


G i n working groups

G-I-N Working Groups

  • Background documentation, development tools, training materials

  • Grading harmonization

  • Guideline programme information

  • Publications and website

  • Workshops and conferences 


The guideline process

Remit / ToR*

Key Questions

Checklist

Checklist

Checklist

Checklist

Checklist

Checklist

Literature Search

Checklist

Checklist

Checklist

Checklist

Checklist

Checklist

Evidence Table

Evidence Table

Evidence Table

Considered

Judgement

Considered

Judgement

Considered

Judgement

Guideline recommendations

The guideline process

*ToR: Terms of referance


Sign nice share evidence tables

SIGN/NICE –share evidence tables

  • SIGN and NICE each appraise 50% of the evidence and produce individual evidence tables

  • Both exchange these evidence tables, so each group has a summary of 100% of the evidence but has only had to appraise 50% of it

  • The judgement process is unique to each guideline developer

  • SIGN and NICE produce separate guidelines


Sign bts collaboration

SIGN/BTS Collaboration

  • Until 2001, the UK had 4 distinct but complementary asthma guidelines

    • One produced by the British Thoracic Society (UK wide distribution but influenced by membership of BTS)

    • Three produced by SIGN (distribution theoretically restricted to Scotland)

  • 1999 – BTS and SIGN agreed to collaborate on the production of a single asthma guideline for UK wide distribution


Sign bts joint benefits

SIGN/BTS – joint benefits

  • Used SIGN methodology

    • with UK wide rather than Scottish representation

  • Shared costs

  • Used BTS clinical contacts and distribution networks

  • Guideline produced as a supplement to Thorax

  • Joint Guideline has a high profile throughout the UK


The international guidelines network

Management of Colorectal Cancer

Define guideline remit and key questions

A national clinical guideline – July 2003

Find and appraise potential source guidelines

Consider updating / adaptation required

Searchingand systematic review of additional evidences

Critical appraisal of additional evidences

Synthesise results and update evidence summaries

FORM RECOMMENDATIONS

Slovene Adaptation Process

  • This guideline is based on an evidence-based guideline in development by the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN).

  • This source guideline has been adapted to include Slovenian data and to reflect the context of organisation and delivery of care to patients with colorectal cancer in Slovenia, as well as including updated research and evidence following a systematic literature search completed with the assistance of SIGN.


Findings 1

Findings (1)

  • The systematic review component of the guideline development process can be shared between guideline developers

  • Variation in grading systems make the synthesis of evidence appraised in different countries difficult - but not impossible. There needs to be a standardised way of developing and updating evidence tables

  • Removing the evidence search and appraisal places greater importance on the “considered judgement” part of the process


Findings 2

Findings (2)

  • Locally adapted guidelines need to explicitly consider workload and cost implications in their local setting

  • Collaboration in guideline development can significantly increase the quality and efficiency of guideline development work.

    • Sharing programme information

    • Standardized development of evidence tables

    • Adapting or endorsing guidelines

  • There is a great potential to create ‘living guidelines’ that can tap into updated evidence tables – such as asthma


Conclusion

Conclusion

  • Collaborative initiatives have to date been largely opportunistic

  • The potential benefits are sufficiently great that guideline organizations should now be actively seeking collaboration

  • GIN can help in standardizing methods and exchanging evidence tables


The international guidelines network

World Health Organisation

Department of Essential Drugs and Medicines Policy

1211 Geneva, Switzerland

Fax 41-22-7914167

Web Site: http://www.who.medicines/

Documentation Centre: [email protected]


  • Login