1 / 7

UK progress Rebekka Artz Stephen Chapman

RECIPE Final Aberdeen Progress meeting 29-31/05/2006 WP02 – Carbon sequestration by peatland vegetation. UK progress Rebekka Artz Stephen Chapman. I. WP1 UK Field site data.

viet
Download Presentation

UK progress Rebekka Artz Stephen Chapman

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. RECIPE Final Aberdeen Progress meeting 29-31/05/2006WP02 – Carbon sequestration by peatland vegetation UK progress Rebekka Artz Stephen Chapman

  2. I. WP1 UK Field site data • D5 Identification of key species successfully occupying abandoned sites and their potential for restoring peat accumulation • 1) vegetation surveys – completed. Stats completed. All four sites have significantly different vegetation structure (by PCACVA). • 2) net biomass data at end of growth period, but no LAI data • 3) gaseous flux datasets from 13/11/03-14/10/04 (14 points)

  3. Dark CO2 production -modelling D6 Rates of carbon return from key species used in the restoration of sites Bare peat, total respiration models (r2 = 0.6 (WT), 0.82 (T @ -5 cm).

  4. CO2 fluxes 2 – PGCO2 E. angustifolium + S. auric. Collars (site B), r2 = 0.72

  5. D7 Rates of C fixation on an area basis etc……major modelling problems • Not enough data to model per collar, trying to overcome this by pooling data from replicate collars (Mika found that this doesn’t always work well…) • Rtot modelling produces very low r2 values – a lot of data had to be excluded as either missed dark measurements or negative dark fluxes • PGCO2 modelling ok, but lack of LAI data forces use of other seasonality index, both air and -5 cm temps seem to work ok • Will try using the Finnish model to see if this simulates our data reasonably well after this meeting…..

  6. II. WP2 …. CO2 flux (mg CO2 m-2 d-1) Problems with negative dark fluxes (i.e. CO2 uptake) probably caused by our large chambers and an overly sensitive IRGA system (when checking data all these fluxes had low r2 values, i.e <0.8), later data (post 02/05) much better but not enough data (only 3 time points) for modelling!

  7. CH4 flux (mg CH4 m-2 d-1)

More Related