1 / 28

Status Update on Mechanical Prototype in Rome

Status Update on Mechanical Prototype in Rome. November 6, 2013. Introduction. We have built the mechanical M2 quadruplet prototype : Assembly of the 5 panels with the “ vacuum bag ” technique ( with some variants ); Assembly of the quadruplet . Outline of the talk:

vidor
Download Presentation

Status Update on Mechanical Prototype in Rome

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Status Update on MechanicalPrototype in Rome November 6, 2013

  2. Introduction • Wehavebuilt the mechanicalM2 quadrupletprototype: • Assembly of the 5 panelswith the “vacuum bag” technique (with some variants); • Assemblyof the quadruplet. • Outline of the talk: • Description of the methodused for the assembly of the last 2 panels (two-stepsgluingtechnique); • M2 panels: structure and components • Results of planaritymeasurementsof the last 2panels; • Quadrupletassembly; • Conclusions.

  3. Method of construction - I • Vacuumbagtechnique. • Vacuum bag operatedwith • anunderpressureof 50 ÷ 100 mbar.

  4. Method of construction - II • First 3 panels(seejuly workshop presentation): • Single-stepvacuumbaggluing: PCB-1 on thegranitetable, PCB-2 on the honeycomb “pushed” by the bag.Glueis put on bothPCBs;  asymmetric planarities obtained (*) ≈ 10 ÷ 20 mm (bottom side) ≈ 30 ÷ 50 mm (top side) • Last 2 panels: • Two-stepsvacuum bag gluing: PCB-1 gluedasabove. After a time Dt the panel isturned and glued to PCB-2 standing on thegranitetable. • Dt = 24 or 5 hrs (glue curing time ≈ 15 hrs @ 20o) (*) Module 2 built with segmentedhoneycombhaslargerRMSs

  5. Test of two-step gluingmethod Aim of the method: reach a goodplanarity on bothsides of the panel. Wehavedoneseveraltests to validate the two-step method, both with Dt=5 and Dt=24 hrs. 100x60 cm2 panel  planaritybelow 20 mm on bothsides  thickness value -26mm wrt nominal Dt = 24 hrs SIDE 1 Dt = 24 hrs SIDE 2 frame points frameswerenotrectified in this test

  6. M2 panels – general structure 1628.5 mm 916 mm Aluminiumrectifiedframes: 40 mm the outer frame 20 mm the inner bar 1103.2 mm

  7. M2 panels - components • PCBmeasurementsdone by PV group on suckingplane. • Honeycombmeasurementsdoneusing the LNF laser tracker with a gaugeblockaboveit. • Frame thickness and planaritycheckedwithMitutoyo. • Glue Araldite 2011: the glue is rolled to give a uniform layer of ≈ 60 mmthickness. • Nominalthickness=2x0.40+2x0.06+10.040=10.960 (11.120panel2) mm

  8. Methods of planaritymeasurement - I Laser tracker @ LNF ≈2500 points with few mm accuracy

  9. Methods of planaritymeasurement - II CMM Machine @ INFN Pisa (points are in a 4 cm spacinglattice) ≈700 points with 2 mm nominal precision

  10. Analysisofplanaritymeasurements •  A list of 3D points wrt a plane defined by the machine itself(obtained by measuring the granite table). • Ouranalysis: • Rawdistributionof heights of the points  sRAW • Fit of the “best plane”  <thickness>, aX, aY • Distribution of heightswrtfittedplane  sFIT • Allthese infos are given in the following. • LNF laser trackerisourbaseline measurement, comparison with CMM will be shown.

  11. Comparisonbetweenplanaritymeasurements: LNF (laser tracker) vs. Pisa (CMM machine) –panel5 side 1

  12. Comparisonbetweenplanaritymeasurements: LNF (laser tracker) vs. Pisa (CMM machine) –panel5 side 2

  13. Angles of fittedplanes aX,Y(Pisa) RMS(LNF) = 25 mrad RMS(Pisa) = 16 mrad Correlation LNF-Pisa: Some correlationispresent. aX,Y(LNF)

  14. Results: panel4 (Dt = 24 hrs) side 1 sRAW (RMS) = 24.4 (28.6) mm sFIT (RMS) = 26.2 (27.0) mm removing the frames: sFIT= 21.7 mm

  15. Results: panel4 (Dt = 24 hrs) side 2 sRAW (RMS) = 29.0 (30.7) mm sFIT (RMS) = 28.1 (27.9) mm removing the frames: sFIT = 22.9 mm

  16. Results: panel5 (Dt = 5 hrs) side 1 sRAW (RMS) = 36.5 (39.1) mm sFIT (RMS) = 35.7 (35.7) mm “depression” on external frame removing the frames: sFIT = 22.8 mm

  17. Results: panel5 (Dt = 5 hrs) side 2 sRAW (RMS) = 39.2 (41.2) mm sFIT (RMS) = 35.2 (38.8) mm “depression” on external frame removing the frames: sFIT = 21.5 mm

  18. Summary - I Sigma obtainedafterplanefittingsFIT The measurementisperformedremovingallpointswithin 10 cm from the frame Thicknessmeasured with side 1 in the table. In () difference in mm wrtnominal.

  19. Summary - II • Planarities: • Two-stepsmethodwith Dt = 24 hrsturns out to be the best option with overallplanarities RMS wellbelow 30 mm on bothfaces. • Improvementsexpected by a better “definition” of the frame  20 mm planarities can be reached. • Panel thicknesswrtnominal(assuming2x60 mm gluethickness): • In average -15 mm with an RMS of 17 mm. • Improvementsexpectedby a bettercontrolof the glueamount. • Methods of measurement • CMM machine and Laser-trackergiveresults in good agreement.

  20. Quadrupletassembly - I Assembly scheme: Panels are glued to drift gap frames (5 mm thick Al notrectified, 20 mm wide) No vacuum bag used, gluingbygravity allpanels in a single step.

  21. Quadrupletassembly - II

  22. Quadrupletassembly - III Precision pins Connecting the two “strip panels”.

  23. Status ofquadruplet • Mechanicalpropertiesstilltobemeasured. Probably a “sag” effect on the top side, tobequantified. • Weplantomakeholesalong the frame toallowmounting on the spacer.

  24. Conclusions • M2 dummyquadruplet ready to bemounted(onlyholes are stillmissing). • Vacuum bag technique(with two-stepsgluing option) allows to get: • Overallplanaritiesbelow 30 mm on bothsides; • Averagethicknessreproducibilitybetterthan 20 mm; • Spaceforimprovementsfrombetter frame structure and glueamountcontrol. • Plantobuild a full-size SM1 driftpanelusing the two-step methodwithDt = 24 hrs

  25. Backup

More Related