Coffee Eco-labeling: Profit, Prosperity, & Healthy Nature? - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Coffee eco labeling profit prosperity healthy nature
1 / 26

  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

Coffee Eco-labeling: Profit, Prosperity, & Healthy Nature?. Brian Crespi Andre Goncalves Janani Kannan Alexey Kudryavtsev Jessica Stern. Presentation Outline. Introduction Question at hand Background of Coffee and Eco-labeling Environmental Impacts Socio-Economic Impacts

I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.

Download Presentation

Coffee Eco-labeling: Profit, Prosperity, & Healthy Nature?

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript

Coffee eco labeling profit prosperity healthy nature

Coffee Eco-labeling:Profit, Prosperity,& Healthy Nature?

Brian CrespiAndre GoncalvesJanani KannanAlexey KudryavtsevJessica Stern

Presentation outline

Presentation Outline

  • Introduction

    • Question at hand

    • Background of Coffee and Eco-labeling

  • Environmental Impacts

  • Socio-Economic Impacts

    • Growers and Consumers

  • Conclusions

    • Future and Alternative Options

  • Question at hand

    Question at Hand

    Is eco-labeling of coffee an effective market incentive to promote environmentally friendly production methods?



    • Coffee

      • 2nd most traded commodity in world, next to oil

      • 5.3 million tons produced globally and exported in 2002 (U.N. Food and Agriculture Organization)



    • Eco-labeling

      • A strategy to encourage strong environmental practices through incentives for the producer

        • Price premium

        • Competitive advantage

          • Appease pressures from environmentalists

        • Future considerations (sustainability)

          • Future market concerns

          • Conservationist outlook

    Eco labeling


    • Not a standard process

      • Third party certification

        • Own criteria for certification under certain principles for different aspects i.e. organic

        • Credibility is key

          • Gives consumer advantage

      • Schemes of Coffee Labeling

        • Fair Trade

        • Organic

        • Shade Grown

    Coffee eco labeling profit prosperity healthy nature





    Coffee certification schemes

    Coffee Certification Schemes

    • Schemes are not mutually exclusive

      • Many growers are certified organic, shade grown and fair trade

        • Must meet criteria for each, but does not mean being certified as one means you are or are not certified by another

    Fair trade

    Fair Trade

    • Seeks to offer small farmers and cooperatives of farmers a fair price for their coffee

      • Ensures access to credit for farmers among other mechanisms

    • Often coexisting with stated sustainable growing practices

      • Modern plantation farming is not conducive to small farmers due to high resource costs and involved methods



    • Grown free of pesticides, herbicides, fungicides and other chemicals

      • Environmental benefits

        • Often coexisting with shade grown certification

    • Most developed current certified coffee market

    Shade grown


    • Grown under a canopy of trees

      • The traditional method of growth before the modernization of coffee agriculture

      • Typically yields a high-quality product with a lesser need for chemical inputs

      • Most often organic also

    Environmental impacts

    Environmental Impacts



    Perfecto and Snelling. (1995) “Biodiversity and the transformation of a tropical agroecosystems.”

    In: Ecological Applications 5: 1084-1097.

    Environmental impacts1

    Environmental Impacts

    • Loss of biodiversity

    • Invasive species

    • Soil erosion

    • Deforestation

    • Agrochemical pollution

    • High energy demand


    • More yield

    • Control over ecosystem

    • Cheaper production

    Environmental impacts2

    Environmental Impacts

    Working for people:

    • Food safety

    • Coffee + fruits + timber

    • Natural pests control

    • Stable yields

      …and for nature:

    • No habitat lost

    • Conserve species

    • Carbon sequestration

    Working landscape?

    Socio economics


    How far does the world-wide coffee industry extend?

    Coffee eco labeling profit prosperity healthy nature

    Current trends affecting growers deal with -


    Drive for a better profit, not a better environment

    Flaws in eco labeling for growers

    Flaws in Eco-Labeling for Growers

    “In practice, small farmers need additional help and incentives to adopt the [bio-diversity friendly] certification criteria . . . Small farmers with [conventional polyculture] farms need to be presented with strategies to lower the risk of investment . . . (Gobbi, 2000).”

    Flaws in eco labeling for growers1

    Flaws in Eco-Labeling for Growers

    “The entry cost to organic production, even subsidized, appears to be too high for the smallest producers, but organic production is a significant option for the slightly larger producers (Bray et al. 2002).”



    Pro-Certification Arguments:

    • Growers cannot get a premium

    • Big companies cannot be held accountable unless they have certification

    • Confidence that the coffee purchased actually serves the purpose

    • Ensures good scientific criteria

    • Helps make an informed decision



    Arguments Against Certification:

    • Certification price is too high

    • Does not control possibility of fraud

    • Broker should be certified

    • Deciding between labels becomes difficult



    Three approaches:

    1. Farmers should not bear the burden of certification costs.

    2. “Relationship coffee” - trading coffee through known sources; certifying brokers

    3. Good quality would ascertain good premium like gourmet coffee



    Figure 2: (National Coffee Association) Percentages of both awareness and total purchase of eco-labeled coffee increased from 2003 to 2004.

    Drawbacks and failures

    Drawbacks and Failures

    • Inversion of Values

    • Cost of certification schemes

      • Difficult without third party support

    • Certification Methodology neglecting social relations

    • Organic norms and regulations across different landscapes

    Coffee eco labeling profit prosperity healthy nature

    Alternative Certification Systems

    • Origin:

    • Southern and Northern countries

    • Reasons:

    • certification costs

    • paradigm for ensuring credibility

    • more adapted system to local realities

    • Definition:

    • A process which generates credibility for the organic product based on the participation and integration of all stakeholders who have interest to guarantee the quality of the product. (Meirelles 2003)

    Coffee eco labeling profit prosperity healthy nature

    Alternative Certification Systems

    • Characteristics:

      • Involve several stakeholders

      • Based on negotiated standards

      • Trustworthy relationships

      • Attempt to integrate social and environmental concerns

    • Examples:

      • Community Support Agriculture

      • Farmers Markets

      • Box schemes

      • Home deliveries

      • Popular fairs

    • International Workshop on Alternative Certification

    One last thing

    One last thing . . .

    We created a web site with

    • Our paper

    • Our references

    • Links to websites

    • Our PowerPoint presentation

  • Login