1 / 15

FOREST WATCH GHANA

FOREST WATCH GHANA. BUILDING FORESTRY RIGHTS CAMPAIGNS. Who are we? . 38 national organisations leading in development rights work Rural livelihoods support (CARE, FON) Scientific research (TROPENBOS) Environmental activism (FOE, GEO, GWS) Socio-economic rights (CR)

victoria
Download Presentation

FOREST WATCH GHANA

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. FOREST WATCH GHANA BUILDING FORESTRY RIGHTS CAMPAIGNS

  2. Who arewe? • 38 national organisations leading in development rights work • Rural livelihoods support (CARE, FON) • Scientific research (TROPENBOS) • Environmental activism (FOE, GEO, GWS) • Socio-economic rights (CR) • Governance (corruption) (GII) • Socio-cultural rights (CIKOD) • Gender rights (NETRIGHT) • International economic justice (TWN-A) • Media & information rights (FEJ) • Public interest law (CEPIL) • Increasingly strong links to 100s of CBOs in forest fringe communities in Ghana • Increasing participation in international rights based CS forest governance movement Workshop on Rights Based Approaches

  3. Rights consciousness and FWG Rights approach to forestry: • united peculiar concerns (e.g. conservation v livelihoods or socio-cultural v. socio-economic) • connected different levels of problem (local, national, international) • clarified values that guide campaign & minimise typical coalition maintenance problems (participation, inclusion, obligation, accountability, holism, Internationalism) • provided collective vehicle for politics of elite engagement (political, traditional, religious etc) Workshop on Rights Based Approaches

  4. What do we want? • Biodiversity for development • Fair access to forest resources - reverse corporate “monopoly” trend. • Fair distribution of forest rents – respect constitution. • participatory forest governance • More CSO engagement around forest rights’ issues Workshop on Rights Based Approaches

  5. Strategies - Bottom up Long term support for self-directed bottom - up advocacy • Facilitating marginalised stakeholder networks • Facilitating public space for marginalised advocacy Community level Networks of marginalised • District Forest Forums • Regional Forest Forums • National Forest Forums Workshop on Rights Based Approaches

  6. Strategies - Legitimacy Legitimate (i.e. accountable, evidence-based) national CS policy advocacy • lobbying and official engagement through coalition structures (MC, TLs & secretariat) • FC, MLFM, Parliament, NHC, ENRM (donor reps), courts, CHRAJ • (Weak) media work (name and shame) Workshop on Rights Based Approaches

  7. Strategies – networking • Forestry is a particular instance of a wider problem of rights deprivation. Logical therefore to • Participate in other CS NR networks in Ghana e.g. • NCOM • Water Rights • Participate in international CS resource rights campaigns e.g. • AIMES • ECFP Workshop on Rights Based Approaches

  8. Strategies – duty bearers • Define “Duty Bearer” broadly as anyone who holds any form of social power at community, district, national and global level in relation to our issues • includes development “professionals” and agencies (activists and NGOs)! • Includes donors and international big business Workshop on Rights Based Approaches

  9. Strategies - accountability Built regular consultation and participation into structures to avoid hi-jacking perception • GM meets 3x yearly – reviews and directs • MC meets monthly • “Team Leader” structure ensures “external” oversight of policy campaigns • Coordinator not Executive Director • All positions subject to annual election Workshop on Rights Based Approaches

  10. Strategies - EU campaign. • Forest crisis driven by corporate timber industry • EU buys 60% of Ghana timber exports (2% of EU need) • EU gives best (still subsidised!) prices • EU important trade partner in other respects • EU and MS (e.g. UK, Denmark) influential donors • EU policy (FLEGT / VPA) largely progressive • Active EU rights based CS campaign (FERN, Greenpeace, GW, EIA etc.) Workshop on Rights Based Approaches

  11. FLEGT / VPA • EU FLEGT responds to recognition that EU market for illegal logs drives environmental, governance (money laundering) and indigenous peoples rights’: • MS weed illegal timber out of public procurement (>20% of EU market) • encourage EU industry to adopt higher standards • contract with willing producer countries to allow MS customs to embargo timber not certified as “legal” in accordance with agreed processes. • Ghana one of first round of VPA negotiations Workshop on Rights Based Approaches

  12. PROCESS SO FAR • Work to understand EU policy, processes & opportunities • Linked with campaigning EU NGOs • Linked with o’r “producer country” NGOs (Cameroon, DRC, Liberia, Brazil, Indonesia, PNG) • Developed collective platform on FLEGT / VPAs • Lobbying EU to be accountable and to increase “development” as opposed to “trade” content of VPAs & to commit publicly to “participation” and “inclusion” & accountability as part of VPA preparations. • Gone “home” to work on VPA preparation processes Workshop on Rights Based Approaches

  13. Achievements (i) • Old Industry-state consensus disrupted – court cases & even contempt citation • MLFM interventions to repair relations (e.g. ENAK TOR) • Internal Industry consensus disrupted • GTA publicly blames GTMO for sector crisis • GTMO quietly advocates elimination of “logging contractors” • Nascent schism within GTMO (FLEGT related?) • State consensus disrupted • MLFM / FC clearly at odds over stumpage – FC vindicated? • MLFM, AuG, MFEP v FC (mgt & BOD),AG & BOG clash over 3% export levy (MLFM efforts to paper over cracks) • Appointment processes stalemated • Evidence that FOSSA & GIPF ready to intervene Workshop on Rights Based Approaches

  14. Achievements (ii) • “SMART” commitments to correct massive wrongs in resource access and benefits sharing. • responsiveness of district forestry offices (where DFFs exist) • Official request for “tech assist” in participation • Acceptance of obligation to account to CS • “Community” ownership of campaigns • domestic and global awareness of forestry / development crisis • Conscious more radical CS – sharper critique of “corporate globalisation”, PRSPs etc. but also better skills in engaging. Workshop on Rights Based Approaches

  15. THANK YOU Workshop on Rights Based Approaches

More Related