1 / 53

The Enterprise of Academia: Strategies for Innovation

The Enterprise of Academia: Strategies for Innovation. January 2004. Science is a Principal Driver of Change. SOCIAL CHANGE Internet.

vicky
Download Presentation

The Enterprise of Academia: Strategies for Innovation

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. The Enterprise of Academia: Strategies for Innovation January 2004

  2. Science is a Principal Driver of Change SOCIAL CHANGE Internet Science has the power to completely transform civilization. For some, science has made life comfortable and secure. For others, it has meant death and destruction HEALTH AND MEDICAL CHANGE Biotechnology SCIENCE- BASED ECONOMY ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE Climate NATIONAL SECURITY CHANGE Weapons of Mass Destruction

  3. Science Policy Can Drive Outcomes Types of Benefits Emergence of New Problems Given the impact of science, science policy is the key variable, yet almost entirely ignored. SCIENCE POLICY Distribution of Benefits Distribution of Problems

  4. Knowledge Production Universities drive innovation Universities are the primary knowledge producers in the United States

  5. Evolution of the U.S. National Innovation System • Laissez-Faire (1790-1940) • War and Post-War (1940-1950) • Federalization (1950-1975)

  6. Laissez-Faire (1790-1940) • Government has no distinct S&T policy or mission • Key institutions in NIS were independent corporate R&D labs • In the late 19th century, universities emerge as the home of basic science and advanced training

  7. War and Post-War (1940-1950) • Government establishes R&D institutions and expanded academic role to support the war effort • Large-scale federal investment, federally mandated objectives, targeted funding and industry-government cooperation are the norm • By end of war, hundreds of new labs established and potential of large-scale R&D to meet national objectives is demonstrated

  8. Current Approach to Science and Technology Policy Addresses • Conduct of S&T • Products and processes of S&T Assumes • All societal outcomes will be positive • Linear model of innovation and societal benefit Inputs Processes Products Outcomes

  9. Federalization: U.S. NIS Institutions • Hundred of large industrial labs • Dozens of large federal labs • Thousands of small technology-oriented labs and companies • Hundred of unconnected and unplanned federal labs • Hundreds of thousands of researchers at universities

  10. But where are we going?

  11. Indications of Societal Transformation • GMO controversy • Affordability of AIDS drugs • Lack of medical insurance • Aging of the population • Changing climate

  12. Discussion How can science and science-based technology most effectively contribute to an improved quality of life for the greatest number of people? • Malaria is the leading cause of death in young children. It is estimated that if malaria had been eradicated in Africa by 1960, GDP would be 32% higher than it is today. • Until the 1950s, polio crippled thousands of children every year in industrialized countries.

  13. Dual Agenda: Science and Social Equity The challenge is to develop S&T policy that reaches a significant proportion of the population • S&T and social issues are critically interdependent • Technology strategy drives government spending and its social outcomes • Linear thinking in technology policy is linear thinking in social outcomes

  14. Science and Technology are Economic Drivers Scientific and technical changes accounts for as much as 50% of long-run economic growth, even perhaps as much as 75%.

  15. Lessons from Old Science Policy • Desired outcomes can drive the science • Societal value of new knowledge is determined by how it is used and by whom it is used • Societal outcomes reflect who is making science policy • Desired outcomes emerge when scientific advance is well-matched by societal needs

  16. Cycle Dynamics Education New skills Societal Outcomes Economic Outcomes New social structures POLICY New industries New institutions S&T Outcomes Conduct of Science Tech transfer Knowledge Networks Knowledge transfer

  17. New Science Policy New Science Policy aims to create knowledge, cultivate public discourse and foster policies that help society grapple with the immense power of science.

  18. A New Science Policy Framework • Outcome-driven • Integrated • Informed • Self-correcting • Recognizes and responds to the inextricable links between science and technology and societal evolution

  19. The Evolving University • The University Must Embrace its Cultural, Socioeconomic, and Physical Setting • The University Must Become a Force, and Not Only a Place • The University as Entrepreneur • Pasteur’s Principle • Intellectual Fusion • Social Embeddedness • Global Engagement

  20. Universities Drive Innovation • Underpin many of the major knowledge-based industries over the past two centuries • Anchor clusters of innovation • Generate creative capital • Generate knowledge capital • Trains human capital • Build social capital • Attract financial capital • Preserve natural capital

  21. Universities Drive Entrepreneurial Activities • Spur the creation, or ‘spin-off’ of new firms based on the R&D activities at the university • Enable ‘social networks’ that encourage technical graduates to stay in the region, and that generate increasingly more high-tech entrepreneurial activity within the region

  22. Role of the University Knowledge production Creativity Innovation Science and Technology Economic Growth

  23. DESIGN IMPERATIVE 1:Leveraging Place ASU Must Embrace its Cultural, Socioeconomic, and Physical Setting

  24. DESIGN IMPERATIVE 1: LEVERAGING PLACE Consortium for the Study of Rapidly Urbanizing Regions (CSRUR) • Study the implications of human impact on the environment • Interdisciplinary cohort of scholars • Urgent local relevance • Learn from experiences of other rapidly growing urban centers

  25. DESIGN IMPERATIVE 1: LEVERAGING PLACE Greater Phoenix 2100 Project • Provide data and analysis to regional decision makers • Published the comprehensive Greater Phoenix Regional Atlas Urban Design Institute www.gp2100.org

  26. DESIGN IMPERATIVE 2:Societal Transformation ASU Must Become a Force, and Not Only a Place

  27. DESIGN IMPERATIVE 2: SOCIETAL TRANSFORMATION • ASU on the Move! • ASU Digital Gateway • ASU in Your Community • Family Engagement • CRESMET: Center for Research on Education in Science, Mathematics, Engineering and Technology http://cresmet.asu.edu

  28. DESIGN IMPERATIVE 3:ASU as Entrepreneur A Culture of Academic Enterprise

  29. DESIGN IMPERATIVE 3: ASU AS ENTREPRENEUR • Intellectual capital as a the source of institution’s prosperity • Build a culture of academic enterprise • Moving from an agency model to an enterprise model

  30. DESIGN IMPERATIVE 3: ASU AS ENTREPRENEUR Virginia G. Piper Center for Creative Writing • Established September 2003 • The Piper investment endows the Piper Center providing funding for operations and innovative programs, including an annual writers’ conference www.asu.edu/pipercwcenter

  31. DESIGN IMPERATIVE 4:Use-Inspired Research Pasteur’s Principle

  32. DESIGN IMPERATIVE 4: USE-INSPIRED RESEARCH • ASU must be a university in which scholars consider the transformational effect of their work on society • Academic programs must be relevant and wherever practicable, directly serve the needs of the people of Arizona

  33. DESIGN IMPERATIVE 4: USE-INSPIRED RESEARCH Consortium for Science, Policy, and Outcomes (CSPO) www.asu.edu/cspo Center for the Study of Religion and Conflict Established in January 2003 Mission: to stimulate and support research and education on the role of religion in public controversies Interdisciplinary and comparative study of religion

  34. DESIGN IMPERATIVE 4: USE-INSPIRED RESEARCH Center for the Production of Vaccines from Applied Crop Sciences (ProVacs) • Develop mechanisms for the delivery of vaccines for hepatitis B, smallpox, and other large-scale killers through genetically-altered tomatoes. www.azbio.org/centers/vaccines.html

  35. DESIGN IMPERATIVE 5:A Focus on the Individual Outcome-Determined Excellence/A Commitment to Diversity

  36. DESIGN IMPERATIVE 5: A FOCUS ON THE INDIVIDUAL • ASU focuses on outcome-determined diversity • Commitment to diversity • Enhance the undergraduate experience with learning in small groups

  37. DESIGN IMPERATIVE 5: A FOCUS ON THE INDIVIDUAL Polytechnic at ASU East • Emphasis on experience-based learning and applications-based problem solving • $27.5 million in new classroom and research space added • 30% increases in enrollment for four years straight

  38. DESIGN IMPERATIVE 5: A FOCUS ON THE INDIVIDUAL ASU West • ASU West is celebrating its 20th year • ASU West serves a diverse body of more than 7,000 students • “Learning community” model expanded to meet the demands of growth in freshman • Committed to the principle of “education without borders”—learning that transcends fields of study, limitations of geography and the age of students

  39. DESIGN IMPERATIVE 5: A FOCUS ON THE INDIVIDUAL Barrett Honors College • ASU as a powerhouse in national scholarship circles—producing more winners of top national scholarships that virtually any other university • Mark Jacobs joins ASU as Dean of the Honors College www.asu.edu/honors

  40. DESIGN IMPERATIVE 5: A FOCUS ON THE INDIVIDUAL Freshman Year Experience • Ranked 23rd in the nation by U.S. News • ASU names one of the 25 colleges for Hispanic students by Hispanic Magazine www.asu.edu/vpsa/fye

  41. DESIGN IMPERATIVE 5: A FOCUS ON THE INDIVIDUAL ASU Leadership Institute for Sport and Humanity Created to bring students, scholars, athletes, professional sports leagues, and leaders in business and industry together to reaffirm the important positive influences of sport in America

  42. DESIGN IMPERATIVE 6:Intellectual Fusion Interdisciplinary/Multidisciplinary/Transdisciplinary/Postdisciplinary

  43. DESIGN IMPERATIVE 6: INTELLECTUAL FUSION Arizona Biodesign Institute Use-inspired fundamental bioscience and engineering research, discovery and innovation to meet human health needs www.azbio.org

  44. DESIGN IMPERATIVE 6: INTELLECTUAL FUSION School of Life Sciences • Genetics and Bioinformatics • Ecology, Evolution and Environmental Sciences • Environmental Engineering Environmental Fluid Dynamics – Air Biotechnology • Centers • CES/CSRUR • EFD-Air • Sustainability Sensors http://sols.asu.edu

  45. DESIGN IMPERATIVE 6: INTELLECTUAL FUSION Institute for Studies in the Arts (ISA) • Build on the innovative and renowned programs • Enlarge scope of the institute • Bring together researchers from diverse disciplines • Special focus on the relationship of the arts to developments in technology and new media http://isa.asu.edu/

  46. DESIGN IMPERATIVE 7:Social Embeddedness Public Service/Community Engagement/Outreach

  47. DESIGN IMPERATIVE 7: SOCIAL EMBEDDEDNESS • Public service has long been a defining characteristic of ASU • Academic institutions reflect society in a utopian microcosm • University as social incubator—we must engage the society evolving before our eyes

  48. DESIGN IMPERATIVE 7: SOCIAL EMBEDDEDNESS ASU Downtown Campus • Serves as the flagship location for the Extended Campus and the ASU College of Extended Education. • The Downtown Center is rapidly moving toward becoming another ASU campus. • ASUonline and ASUtv deliver ASU courses and public service programming 24 hours a day

  49. DESIGN IMPERATIVE 7: SOCIAL EMBEDDEDNESS Impact in Pre-K Education Stardust Center for Affordable Homes and the Family ASU has four primary goals: • Develop high quality teachers • To develop strong school leaders • To create early interventions and • To encourage cooperation between schools and the private sector.

  50. DESIGN IMPERATIVE 7: SOCIAL EMBEDDEDNESS Academic Community Engagement Services (ACES) • Over past decade more than 4,000 ASU students have given over 600,000 hours of service • Students tutor reading, math, and science to more than 1,500 children in impoverished areas of Metro Phoenix—34 programs at 16 sites

More Related