1 / 32

The Lao FNR-Rio Project Implementation Review

The Lao FNR-Rio Project Implementation Review. Workshop on FNR-Rio Project Implementation Review and the 2 nd Project Steering Committee Meeting, 26-28 January 2011 in Port Lois -Mauritius. By Lao Delegation Department of Environment ( DoE )

vian
Download Presentation

The Lao FNR-Rio Project Implementation Review

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. The Lao FNR-Rio Project Implementation Review Workshop on FNR-Rio Project Implementation Review and the 2nd Project Steering Committee Meeting, 26-28 January 2011 in Port Lois -Mauritius. By Lao Delegation Department of Environment (DoE) Water Resources and Environment Administration (WREA)

  2. Plan of Presentation • Achievement • Challenges • Lesson Learnt • Conclusions • Recommendation

  3. Achievement in year 2010

  4. First Milestones (Jan-Jun 2010)

  5. Second Milestones (July-Dec. 2010)

  6. Project Components Component 2: Implementation of Integrated Reporting Processes and Experimenting Options for reports design Component 1: Situational Analysis and Reporting Process Design Component 3: Sharing of Experience and Up scaling Output 1.1: Inventory and analysis report of convention reporting requirements in terms of institutional arrangement, linkages, content and format is prepared Output 2.1: Institutional frameworks for integrated reporting to conventions is established or strengthened Output 3.1: Technical Working Group (TWG) on integrate reporting from countries participating in the project established for information and experience sharing is established and met Output 2.2: National convention-related data collection, analysis and information management systems with agreed standardized collection and analysis procedures are established or enhanced Output 1.2: Analysis report of existing data and Information management systems at the country level with recommendations for designing more integrated systems is prepared Output 3.2: An international workshop on lesson learned and best practices for integrated reporting organized is held Output 2.3: Capacities (systemic, institutional and individual) of relevant institutions for data collection, analysis and information management through provision of necessary training and computing equipment are enhanced Output 1.3: Manual on implementation of integrated Reporting approach is produced Output 2.4: assessment report of the quality of national reports is prepared

  7. Rio Progress Outputs Output 1.1: Inventory and analysis of reporting requirement submitted Output 1.2: National level analyze and recommendations for data management submitted June 2010 Output 1.3: Manual produced on integrated reporting submitted 30 September 2010

  8. Lao Nation Project Committee by Minister Agreement No 580/PM-WREA, dated 1 March 2010

  9. Lao Nation Project Committee by Minister Agreement No 580/PM-WREA, dated 1 March 2010

  10. Lao Nation Project Support Unit by Minister Agreement No 580/PM-WREA, dated 1 March 2010

  11. Main Finding in NAR Lao PDR is classified as a country with limited institutional and human resource capacities to meet the requirements from the Rio Conventions. As a result the country fails to submit national reports to the convention secretariat. However, level of difficulty in preparing national reports might be different which depends on data information requirement and critical analysis to be reported.

  12. Past Technical Reporting (TR) to Rio Convention as Submitted to the Rio Convention Secretariats

  13. Main weakness before 2007 under STEA

  14. Main updating after 2007 under WREA

  15. National Steering Committee on UNFCCC Organization Chart NSCCC Chair Deputy Prime Minister Minister of MAF Vice Chair Minister of WREA Standing Vice Chair Minister of MPI Vice Chair NSCCC 18 members/line M • 8 TWGs • Agriculture, Forestry • and Land Use • 2. Energy • 3. Water Resources • 4. Urban Infrastructures • 5. Public Health • 6. Cleaner Product • 7. Economic Development • 8. Financial Instruments NSCCC Secretariat: 7 (DOE/Line Ministries) (DG & DDG Level) Climate Change Office Universities, Private sectors International Organizations

  16. DOE Division of InformationManagement Division of Planning and Cooperation CCO Division of Policy and Law Division of Pollution Control Division of Environment Promotion Policy & Coordination Unit Vulnerability & Adaptation (V&A) Unit Mitigation & CDM Unit Communication & Promotion Unit Administration Unit CDM DNA Secretariat National Climate Change Strategy & Action Plan Capacity building Admin NAPA Mitigation Action Plan Finance Education and information Adaptation Action Plan Negotiation GHG inventory Adaptation Fund access ICT Carbon finance National Communications Climate Change Office’s Organization Chart

  17. National Steering Committee on UNCBD Organization Chart National Environmental Committee (NEC) Chair, Deputy Prime Minister Technical Advisory Group: - DoE, MAF - DoA, MAF - Dept. of Livestock and Fisheries, MAF - NAFRI, MAF - DoF, MAF - NAFES, MAF - Dept. of Forest Inspection, MAF - Dept. of Electricity, MEM - National Tourism Authority - DoT, MPWT - DoE, WREA - DMH, WREA - EIA Office, DoE, WREA - NDPO, MLSW Minister of Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry (MAF), Vice Chair Department of Planning and Cooperation , Secretariat to Vice Chair ForestryDepartment, UNCBD Focal Point Universities, Private sectors, International Organizations Division of Forest Resources Conservation (DFRC) Technical Team

  18. Organization Chart of Division of Forestry Resources Conservation (DFRC) Division of Forestry Resources Conservation (DFRC) CITES Coordination Unit Forestry Conservation Unit Aquatic and Wildlife Animal Management Unit Data Information Management Unit

  19. National Steering Committee on UNCCD Organization Chart Technical Advisory Group: - AERC, NAFRI, MAF - PRC, NAFRI, MAF - FRC, NAFRI, MAF - SS, NAFRI, MAF - LFAD, NAFRI, MAF - NAFES, MAF - DoF, MAF - DoA, MAF - DoI, MAF - NLMA, PM - DoE, WREA - DHM, WREA - NUOL - NDPO, MLSW - NAST, PM - Ministry of Foreign Affair - Women and Youth Unions National Environmental Committee (NEC) Chair, Deputy Prime Minister Minister of Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry (MAF), Vice Chair Department of Planning and Cooperation , Secretariat to Vice Chair National Agriculture & Forestry Research Institute, UNCCD Focal Point Universities, Private sectors, International Organizations Agriculture Land Utilization Research Center Technical Team

  20. Organization Chart of the Agriculture Land Utilization Research Center (ALURC) Agriculture Land Utilization Research Center Administration Unit Land Utilization Research and Planning Unit Land Utilization Management Unit Laboratory Unit Soil Laboratory Land and Fertilizer Improvement Planning Admin Research and Planning Plants Laboratory Planning Geography data information Land Utilization Management Bacteria and Fertilizer Laboratory

  21. Financial Espenditure for WP 2010

  22. 2. Challenges and constraints • Weak institutional capacity and lack of in depth understanding of NFR-Project procedures and Structure. • lack of human resources (technical, English skills), sustainable funding, data collection, appropriated coordination, information dissemination systems and institutional synergie. • Limitation of specialize on three Rio Convention Replacement and recruit new project assistant • Insufficient support Awareness activities. • Weak Country ownership for effective implementation of FNR projects. • Insufficient support equipments such as computer.

  23. 3. Lesson learnt • Strongly coordination, data-information sharing or flowing system between internal and external. • More supported and advised from NSC, PNA, NC and IC to FNR Support Unit. • 3. Limitation of specialize on three Rio Convention. • 4. More support training and awareness activities at all level concerned

  24. 4. Conclusions • The country has shown its willingness to commit to obligations of the three Rio Conventions despite the fact that it faces many challenges such mentioned as above. • These are areas for the NFPs as well as related stakeholders to work together to improve their management framework and institutional synergies for national reporting to Rio Conventions.

  25. 4. Recommendations Strengthen capacity of Institution & human resource Improve coordination and data management system for national reporting Improvement financial mobilization approach Strengthen communication.

  26. Proposed Institutional Arrangement for Information Flow for the National Reporting to Rio Conventions NEC DoE NAFRI DoF UNFCCC UNCBD UNCCD CH database CH database CH database DoE Rio Convention Secretariat at National Level/ Coordination Focal Point Office for Rio Conventions

  27. Thank you

More Related