recent results on antiparticles in cosmic rays from pamela experiment
Download
Skip this Video
Download Presentation
Recent results on antiparticles in cosmic rays from PAMELA experiment

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 33

Recent results on antiparticles in cosmic rays from PAMELA experiment - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 119 Views
  • Uploaded on

Recent results on antiparticles in cosmic rays from PAMELA experiment. Sergio Ricciarini INFN – Florence, Italy On behalf of the PAMELA collaboration. Summary. The PAMELA experiment: short introduction. Discussion of recent results. (1) Antiproton/proton ratio at high energies

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about ' Recent results on antiparticles in cosmic rays from PAMELA experiment' - vevina


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
recent results on antiparticles in cosmic rays from pamela experiment

Recent results on antiparticlesin cosmic raysfrom PAMELA experiment

Sergio Ricciarini

INFN – Florence, Italy

On behalf of the PAMELA collaboration

slide2

Summary

The PAMELA experiment: short introduction.

Discussion of recent results.

(1) Antiproton/proton ratio at high energies

(submitted to Phys. Rev. Lett.).

(2) Positron fraction at high energies

(submitted to Nature).

Conclusion and prospects.

S. Ricciarini GDR-SUSY 08

the pamela collaboration
The PAMELA collaboration

Bari

Frascati

Naples

Rome

Trieste

Italy

Florence

Russia

Moscow,

St. Petersburg

Germany

Sweden

Siegen

Stockholm

S. Ricciarini GDR-SUSY 08

slide4

PAMELA scientific objectives

Study antiparticles in cosmic rays.

Search for dark matter annihilation(e+ and p-bar spectra).

Study cosmic-ray production and propagation.

Study composition and spectra of cosmic rays (including light nuclei).

Search for anti-He (primordial antimatter).

Study solar physics and solar modulation.

Study of terrestrial magnetosphere and radiation belts.

S. Ricciarini GDR-SUSY 08

slide5

PAMELA nominal capabilities

Energy range (with 3 years statistics)

Antiprotons 80 MeV - 190 GeV

Positrons 50 MeV - 270 GeV

Protons up to 700 GeV

Electrons up to 400 GeV

Electrons+positrons up to 2 TeV (from calorimeter)

Light Nuclei up to 200 GeV/n (He/Be/C)

AntiNuclei search

  • Simultaneous measurement of many cosmic-ray species.
  • New energy range.
  • Unprecedented statistics.

S. Ricciarini GDR-SUSY 08

pamela detectors
PAMELA detectors

Main requirements:high-sensitivity antiparticle identification and precise momentum measurement

+ -

  • Time-Of-Flight (TOF)
  • plastic scintillators + PMT:
  • Trigger
  • Albedo rejection
  • Mass identification up to 1 GeV
  • - Charge value from dE/dL
  • Electromagnetic calorimeter
  • W/Si sampling (16.3 X0, 0.6 λI)
  • Discrimination e+ / p, p-bar / e-
  • (shower topology)
  • Direct E measurement for e-/e+
  • Neutron detector
  • polyethylene + 3He counters:
  • High-energy e/h discrimination

GF: 21.6 cm2 sr Mass: 470 kg

Size: 130x70x70 cm3

Power Budget: 360 W

Spectrometer

microstrip Si tracking system (TRK)+ permanent magnet

- Magnetic rigidity R = pc/Ze (GV); magnetic deflectionη=1/R (GV-1)

- Charge sign, momentum

- Charge value from dE/dL

S. Ricciarini GDR-SUSY 08

slide7

Satellite and orbit

350 km

70o

SAA

610 km

orbit period ~90 min

350 km

70°

610 km

PAMELA

  • PAMELA mounted on Russian satellite Resurs-DK1, inside a pressurized container.
  • Minimum lifetime 3 years starting from June 2006.
  • Quasi-polar low-earth elliptical orbit (70.0°, 350 - 610 km).
  • Traverses and operates in the South Atlantic Anomaly.
  • Crosses the outer (electron) Van Allen belt at south pole.

S. Ricciarini GDR-SUSY 08

slide9

High-energy antiproton/proton analysis

Results discussed here have been submitted to Phys. Rev. Lett.

Analyzed data: July 2006 - February 2008.

Total acquisition time ~ 500 days.

Collected ~ 1x109 triggers (~ 8.8TB of data).

Identified ~10 x 106 protons and ~1 x 103 antiprotons with kinetic energy between 1.5 and 100 GeV.

  • Collected 100 antiprotons above 20 GeV.

S. Ricciarini GDR-SUSY 08

antiproton and proton basic cuts
Antiproton and proton: basic cuts
  • All requirements in the p-bar/p analysis are applied for both charge signs.
  • Clean event pattern (reject spurious events):
    • single track in TRK;
    • no activity in CARD+CAT;
    • no multiple hits in S1+S2 (segmented).
  • MIP |Z|=1 particle.
    • TRK+S1+S2 dE/dL < 3 MIP.
  • Galactic particle (reject albedo, reentrant, East-West effect):
    • downward-going particle (300 ps TOF resolution over 3 ns flight time);
    • measured rigidity R > 1.3 vertical geomagnetic cutoff.

S1

CARD

CAT

S2

.

TOF

TRK

CAS

S3

CALO

S4

ND

S. Ricciarini GDR-SUSY 08

electron hadron separation with calo
Electron/hadron separation with CALO
  • Contamination from e- on p-bar sample is reduced to a negligible amount.
    • e- are easily identified in CALO from interaction topology (rejection factor >104): they interact in the first CALO layers and give well contained and compact EM showers;
    • on the other hand, most hadrons interact well deep in the CALO or do not interact at all.

hadron (R=19GV)

electron (R=17GV)

22 modules (Y Si-strip + W layer + X Si-strip)

Total depth: 16.3 X0 or 0.6 λI

S. Ricciarini GDR-SUSY 08

momentum and charge sign with trk
Momentum and charge sign with TRK
  • Minimal track requirements for good rigidity measurement:
    • at least 4 X (bending view) + 3 Y hits;
    • energy-dependent cut on track c2 (~95% total efficiency);
    • consistent TRK+TOF+CALO spatial information.

Magnetic rigidity R = pc/Ze (GV)

Magnetic deflectionη = 1/R (GV-1)

MDR (Maximum Detectable Rigidity):

Def.: |R|=MDR  σR=|R|

MDR=1/ση (ση spectrometer deflection resolution)

MDR depends on event characteristics and is evaluated event-by-event with the fitting routine:

- number and distribution of fitted points along the track;

- spatial resolution of the single position measurements (varies with track inclination and strip noise);

- magnetic field intensity along the track.

S. Ricciarini GDR-SUSY 08

slide13

Rejection of p “spillover” background

  • Main difficulty here is the background from “spillover” protons in the p-bar sample at high energies (protons with wrong charge sign):
    • finite MDR limits the precision of η (R) measurement;
    • high (~ 104) p/p-bar ratio in cosmic rays.

Minimal track requirements plus: MDR > 850 GV (high-precision subsample).

  • Defined additional optimized track requirements to improve MDR:
  • - stronger constraints on χ2 at high energies (~75% efficiency);
  • - rejected tracks with low-spatial-resolution clusters along the trajectory:
    • - faulty strips (high noise);
    • - δ-rays (high signal and multiplicity).

Protons

and spillover

R = - 10 GV

R = - 50 GV

Antiprotons

S. Ricciarini GDR-SUSY 08

slide14

Rejection of p “spillover” background

R= - 50 GV

Preliminary!!

  • Rigidity-dependent cut to reject residual spillover: MDR > 10 ∙ |R|
  • This cut is equivalent to:|η| > 10 ∙ ση
  • This conservative rejection cut reduces residual spillover contamination to a negligible amount.

p-bar

subsample with

MDR > 850 GV 

Protons and spillover

MDR > 10 ∙ |R| 

R = - 10 GV

S. Ricciarini GDR-SUSY 08

slide15

Antiproton/proton ratio

  • Excellent agreement with recent data from other experiments.
    • One order of magnitude improvement in statistics.
    • Most extended energy range ever achieved.
    • Expected further improvements with new data.
  • Correction factors are included and ~ one order of magnitude less than statistical error.
    • CALO efficiency (different for p-bar and p);
    • loss of particles for interactions.

S. Ricciarini GDR-SUSY 08

slide16

PAMELA p-bar/p ratio and theory

  • Ratio increases smoothly with energy from 4 x 10-5 and levels off at ~ 1 x 10-4.
  • Our results are enough precise to place tight constraints on parameters relevant for secondary production calculations.
  • Our data above 10 GeV place limits on contributions from exotic sources, e.g. dark matter particle annihilations.

S. Ricciarini GDR-SUSY 08

slide18

High-energy positron fraction analysis

Results discussed here have been submitted to Nature.

Analyzed data: July 2006 - February 2008.

Total acquisition time ~ 500 days.

~ 1x109 triggers (~ 8.8TB of data).

Identified ~150 x 103 electrons and ~9 x 103 positrons with energy between 1.5 and 100 GeV.

  • Collected 180 positrons above 20 GeV.

S. Ricciarini GDR-SUSY 08

slide19

Distribution of fraction F before CALO cuts

Preliminary!!

Rigidity: 20-30 GV

Fraction F of energy released in CALO along the track in a cylinder of radius 0.3 rMolière

(central + 2 lateral Si strips)

Z = -1

e-

p-bar (non-int)

p-bar (int)

after basic event cuts

Z = +1

p (non-int)

(e+)

p (int)

S. Ricciarini GDR-SUSY 08

cut on energy rigidity match
Cut on “energy-rigidity match”
  • Consider the ratio between total energy measured by CALO and rigidity measured by TRK.
    • For electrons (positrons) ratio is constant over rigidity.

e-

e+

int. p

total energy measured in CALO/

rigidity measured in TRK (MIP/GV)

 ‘electron cut’

non-int. + int. protons

non-int. p-bar

S. Ricciarini GDR-SUSY 08

slide21

Cut on “energy-rigidity match”

Preliminary!!

Rigidity: 20-30 GV

Fraction F of energy released in CALO along the track

Z = -1

e-

+

Constraints on:

p-bar

Energy-rigidity match

Z = +1

all non-interacting and most interacting protons are rejected

e+

p

S. Ricciarini GDR-SUSY 08

e and e identification in calorimeter
e+ and e- identification in calorimeter
  • Less than 1 proton out of 105 survives the complete set of CALO cuts, with e+ efficiency 80%.

e-

e+

p

S. Ricciarini GDR-SUSY 08

slide23

Cut on shower starting point

Constraints on:

  • Proton background was also characterized at beam tests.

Energy-rigidity match

Shower starting point

Flight data.

Rigidity: 20-30 GV

Beam-test data after same cuts are applied.

Rigidity: 50 GV

Z = -1

e-

e-

e-

e+

p

Z = +1

e+

p

p

S. Ricciarini GDR-SUSY 08

slide24

Cross-check with ND flight data

  • Cross-check with flight data from neutron detector to validate the selection procedure.

Fraction F

Rigidity: 20-30 GV

Neutrons detected by ND

Z = -1

e-

e-

Z = +1

e+

e+

p

p

Residual p background

S. Ricciarini GDR-SUSY 08

slide25

Cut on longitudinal profile

Flight data:

51 GV positron

S. Ricciarini GDR-SUSY 08

slide26

Cut on longitudinal profile

Preliminary!!

Fraction F of energy released in CALO along the track

Rigidity: 20-30 GV

+

Constraints on:

Z = -1

Energy-rigidity match

Shower starting point

Longitudinal profile

Z = +1

S. Ricciarini GDR-SUSY 08

slide27

Cross-check with energy loss in TRK

  • Top: proton and electron samples, identified with TRK only (charge sign).

Rigidity: 10-15 GV

Rigidity: 15-20 GV

p

e-

p

e-

p

e+

p

e+

  • Bottom: proton and positron (+ residual p background) samples,identified with present CALO requirements.

S. Ricciarini GDR-SUSY 08

slide28

Proton contamination

  • Proton contamination obtained directly from flight data (no simulation involved) and subtracted with statistical “bootstrap” analysis.
  • Considered three F distributions in a reduced calorimeter after applying all CALO cuts:
    • (a) electrons and (c) e+ with residual p background: selected in upper CALO.
    • (b) protons: “pre-sampled” in first 2 modules and then selected in lower CALO.

e-

Rigidity: 28-42 GV

electron selection

reduced CALO (20 out of 22 modules)

p

proton selection

p

e+

positron + residual p background selection

S. Ricciarini GDR-SUSY 08

slide29

Positron fraction at high energies

  • One order of magnitude improvement in statistics over previous measurements.
  • Most extended energy range ever achieved.
  • Expected further improvements with new data.
  • At high energies our data show a significant increase with energy.
  • This cannot be explained by standard models of secondary production of cosmic rays.
    • Either a significant change in the acceleration or propagation models is needed;
    • or a primary component is present.
  • Among primary-component candidates:
    • annihilation of dark matter in the vicinity of our galaxy;
    • near-by astrophysical sources, like pulsars.

line: secondary production,

Moskalenko and Strong,

Astrophys. J. 493 (1998)

S. Ricciarini GDR-SUSY 08

slide30

Positron fraction at low energies

  • At low energies our results are systematically lower than data collected in 1990’s.
    • Clem 2007 (with much lower statistics) is consistent with PAMELA.
  • This is interpreted as effect of charge-sign dependent solar modulation.
    • our data are enough precise to allow tuning of models of the heliosphere.
  • Ruled out as negligible a possible combined effect of:
    • asymmetry of spectrometer magnetic field;
    • East-West effect or reentrant albedo particles.

S. Ricciarini GDR-SUSY 08

slide31

Low-energy e+ fraction and solar modulation

  • Solar modulation (through solar wind) of cosmic ray fluxes depends on:
    • amount of solar activity;
    • polarity of solar magnetic field;
    • cosmic-ray energy and mass;
    • charge sign of cosmic ray.

2000: inversion of solar magnetic field

Neutron intensity (Rome monitor)

PAMELA

Clem

now: solar minimum

low-energy p-bar/p ratio

(BESS)

low-energy e+ fraction (Caprice, MASS, HEAT, AMS98...)

year

A-

A+

A-

A+

S. Ricciarini GDR-SUSY 08

slide32

Charge-sign dependence of solar modulation

A > 0

Positive particles

A < 0

Preliminary!!

(Preliminary!)

A>0

A<0

A<0

“drift” component of solar modulation

is enhanced during solar minimum

for low-mass particles

[Potgieter et al., Space Sci. Rev. 97 (2001)]

A>0

S. Ricciarini GDR-SUSY 08

slide33

Conclusion and prospects

  • Precise measurements of p-bar/p ratio and of positron fraction over a wide energy range have been presented and discussed.
  • PAMELA is expected to collect data until at least December 2009.
    • increase in statistics will allow to extend energy range for p-bar/p ratio and positron fraction to the design limits.
  • Several other items are currently under analysis:
    • p-bar/p ratio and positron fraction in the energy range 100 MeV - 1 GeV;
    • absolute differential spectra of |Z|=1 cosmic rays;
    • nuclei (up to Z = 8);
    • spectra of high-energy Solar Energetic Particles (SEP);
    • radiation belts: morphology and energy spectrum;
    • search for anti-He;
    • study of isotope composition (d, 3He).

S. Ricciarini GDR-SUSY 08

ad