1 / 22

Overview of the Service-Dominant Logic of Marketing

Overview of the Service-Dominant Logic of Marketing . Academic Presentation for the Otago Forum on Service-Dominant Logic November 21, 2005 Stephen L. Vargo, University of Hawaii at Manoa Robert F. Lusch, University of Arizona. Related Work.

vevay
Download Presentation

Overview of the Service-Dominant Logic of Marketing

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Overview of theService-Dominant Logic of Marketing Academic Presentation for the Otago Forum on Service-Dominant Logic November 21, 2005 Stephen L. Vargo, University of Hawaii at Manoa Robert F. Lusch, University of Arizona

  2. Related Work • Vargo, S. L. and R.F. Lusch (2004) “Evolving to a New Dominant Logic of Marketing,”Journal of Marketing • Harold H. Maynard Award for “significant contribution to marketing theory and thought.” • Vargo, S.L. and R. F. Lusch (2004)“The Four Service Myths: Remnants of a Manufacturing Model” Journal of Service Research • Vargo, S.L. and F.W. Morgan (2005) “An Historical Reexamination of the Nature of Exchange: The Service Perspective,”Journal of Macromarketing • Lusch, R.F. and S.L. Vargo, editors (2006), The Service-Dominant Logic of Marketing: Dialog, Debate, and Directions, Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe (forthcoming) S-D Logic Overview

  3. Precursors • Historical treatment of services • Smith’s (1776) bifurcation • Bastiat’s (1848) reconsideration • “Services are exchanged for services…it is the beginning, the middle, and the end of economic science” • Goods as distribution mechanisms for service • Goods as embodied knowledge • Strategic Role of Resource Management S-D Logic Overview

  4. Goods-dominant (G-D) Logic • Purpose of economic activity is to make and distribute units of output, preferably tangible (i.e., goods) • Goods are embedded with utility (value) during manufacturing • Goal is to maximize profit by decreasing cost and increasing number of units of output sold • For efficiency, goods should be standardized, produced away from the market, and inventoried till demanded S-D Logic Overview

  5. Uneasiness with Dominant Model • What is needed is not an interpretation of utility created by marketing, but a marketing interpretation of the whole process of creating utility” (Alderson, 1957) • “The historical marketing management function, based on the microeconomic maximization paradigm, must be critically examined for its relevance to marketing theory and practice.” Webster (1992) • “The exchange paradigm serves the purpose of explaining value distribution (but) where consumers are involved in coproduction and have interdependent relationships, the concern for value creation is paramount…There is a need for an alternative paradigm of marketing.” Sheth and Parvatiyar (2000) • “The very nature of network organization, the kinds of theories useful to its understanding, and the potential impact on the organization of consumption all suggest that a paradigm shift for marketing may not be far over the horizon.” Achrol and Kotler (1999) S-D Logic Overview

  6. Value Proposition • Organizations can better benefit customers, society, and, themselves, by adopting a service-dominant (rather than goods-dominant) understanding of exchange and marketing. • Corollary: educators can be more relevant by embracing and communicating S-D Logic S-D Logic Overview

  7. A Partial Pedigree • Services and Relationship Marketing • e.g., Shostack (1977); Berry (1983); Gummesson (1994) ; Gronroos (1994); etc. • Theory of the firm • Penrose (1959) • Core Competency Theory • (Prahald and Hamel (1990); Day 1994) • Resource-Advantage Theory and Resource-Management Strategies • Hunt (2000; 2002); Constantin and Lusch (1994) • Network Theory S-D Logic Overview

  8. Service • The application of specialized competences (knowledge and skills) through deeds, processes, and performances for the benefit of another entity or the entity itself (self-service) S-D Logic Overview

  9. Service-Dominant (S-D) Logic • Identify core competences, knowledge and skills that represent a potential competitive advantage • Cultivate relationships with potential customers • develop customized, compelling value propositions • Co-create value with customer • Use financial performance as an instrument of learning for improving the level of service for customers and markets S-D Logic Overview

  10. Shift in Focus fromOperand to Operant Resources • Operand Resources • Resources upon which an operation or act is performed to produce an effect • primarily physical resources, goods, etc • Operant Resources • Resources that produce effects • e.g., primarily knowledge and skills—competences S-D Logic Overview

  11. Evolution of Marketing Thought Market With (Collaborate with Customers & Partners to Produce & Sustain Value) To Market (Matter in Motion) Market To (Management of Customers & Markets ) Through 1950 1950-2005 2005+ S-D Logic Overview

  12. Foundational Premises • FP1. The application of specialized skill(s) and knowledge is the fundamental unit of exchange. • Service (application of skills and knowledge) is exchanged for service • FP2. Indirect exchange masks the fundamental unit of exchange. • Micro-specialization, intermediaries, and money obscure the service-for-service nature of exchange • FP3. Goods are distribution mechanisms for service provision. • “Activities render service; things render service” (Gummesson 1995) : goods are appliances

  13. Foundational Premises (2) • FP4. Knowledge is the fundamental source of competitive advantage • Operant resources, especially “know-how,” are the essential component of differentiation • FP5. All economies are service economies. • Service only now becoming more apparent with increased specialization and outsourcing • FP6. The customer is always a co-creator of value. • There is no value until offering is used—experience and perception are essential to value determination S-D Logic Overview

  14. Foundational Premises (3) • FP7. The enterprise can only make value propositions. • Since value is always determined by the customer (value-in-use)—it can not be embedded through manufacturing (value-in-exchange) • FP8. A service-centered view is inherently customer oriented and relational • Resources being used for the benefit of, and in interaction with, the customer, places the customer at the center of value creation and implies relationship. • FP 9. Organizations exist to combine specialized competences into complex service that is demanded in the marketplace. • The firm is an integrator of macro and micro-specializations

  15. Operand Resources Tangible Value Added Goods Products Transactional Units of Output Promotion Brand Equity Profit Maximization Operant Resources Intangible Co-creation of value Service Experiences Relational Processes Conversation/Dialog Customer Equity Financial Feedback Evolving Toward a Service-Dominant Logic G-D Focus S-D Focus S-D Logic Overview

  16. Marketing Redefined • Marketing is the process in society and organizations that facilitate voluntary exchange through collaborative relationships that create reciprocal value through the application of complementary resources. • Therefore marketing can be viewed as the means by which societies are able to create value through the voluntary exchange of knowledge and skills. S-D Logic Overview

  17. What S-D Logic is Not • Reflection of the transition to a services era • Justified by the Superior Customer Responsiveness of “Service” Companies • Restatement Of The Consumer Orientation • Alternative To The “Exchange Paradigm” • Equating Service with Provision of “Functional Benefits” • Suggesting that Financial Feedback Equals Profit • Applicable only to marketing management S-D Logic Overview

  18. Implications • Making services more “goods-like” (tangible, separable, etc.) may not be correct normative marketing goal • Make goods-more service-like. • Firms may consider becoming more pure marketing-services firms • Outsource manufacturing (as well as other non-core competences) • Consider selling service flows rather than ownership, even when goods are involved S-D Logic Overview

  19. Implications (2) • Rethink “industrial” and employment classifications • Develop service-dominant lexicon and models • e.g., perceived quality, relationship, customer equity • Refocus marketing research • Processes, experiences, complexity, networks, intangibles, etc. • Rethink marketing curriculum S-D Logic Overview

  20. S-D Logic Can Direct Macro/Public Policy S-D Logic Overview

  21. What S-D Logic Might be • Foundation of a paradigm shift in marketing • Basis for a General Theory of Marketing • Reorientation for economic theory • Foundation for theory of the firm • Perspective for understanding role of markets in society—Theory of Markets S-D Logic Overview

  22. Thank You! For More Information on S-D Logic visit: sdlogic.org We encourage your comments and input. If you would like your working papers or teaching material and/or links to your research displayed on the website, please e-mail us Steve Vargo: svargo@sdlogic.net Bob Lusch: rlusch@sdlogic.net S-D Logic Overview

More Related