1 / 9

Virginia Association of Counties

Virginia Association of Counties. INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SURVEY RESULTS Presented by: Jim Campbell • Daniel Drummond • Donnie Rife. NOVEMBER 11, 2008.

veta
Download Presentation

Virginia Association of Counties

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Virginia Association of Counties INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SURVEY RESULTS Presented by: Jim Campbell • Daniel Drummond • Donnie Rife NOVEMBER 11, 2008

  2. Prepared by Northrop Grumman and the Virginia Information Technologies Agency through its Information Technology Infrastructure Partnership Distributed to Board of Supervisors and County Administrators, IT professionals and other professionals across Virginia in September to gauge interest in the importance of bringing new IT solutions into Virginia’s county operations and services 80% participation rate across the Commonwealth’s counties with 76 counties participating Garnered a total of 103 responses (some counties had a greater participation rate among survey recipients) Survey Overview

  3. Albemarle Dickenson King George Prince Edward Alleghany Dinwiddie Lancaster Prince George Amelia Essex Lee Prince William Appomattox Fairfax Loudoun Pulaski Arlington Fauquier Louisa Rappahannock Augusta Floyd Madison Roanoke Bath Fluvanna Mathews Rockbridge Botetourt Frederick Middlesex Rockingham Buchanan Giles Nelson Scott Campbell Gloucester Northampton Stafford Caroline Goochland Northumberland Surry Carroll Grayson Nottoway Sussex Charlotte Henrico Orange Warren Clarke Highland Page Washington Craig Isle of Wight Patrick Westmoreland Culpeper James City Pittsylvania York Cumberland King and Queen Powhatan Participating Counties

  4. Survey Results

  5. What is your position?

  6. In general, how would you rate your county's use of technology and the Internet to deliver services? 60% of respondents noted positive use of technology within their counties.

  7. Do you feel your citizens will expect more use of technology and integrated technology solutions in the future? 74% of respondents feel that citizens will expect more use of technology and IT in the future.

  8. If it did not require additional outlay, for which of the following would you consider using an outside vendor to help provide services electronically to your county?

  9. “These services are better provided in-house"  “We are already using outside vendors for many of the above items” “Data Storage, Document Imaging & Archiving”  “E-Discovery” “We already do most of these – we currently do a start-up of 311 services”   “Need urgent assistance in acquiring affordable county-wide Internet service”   “Broadband assistance”  “We need to improve high-speed access first”    “We will have a service for citizen alert with our new 911” Additional Responses If it did not require additional capital outlay, for which of the following would you consider using an outside vendor to help provide services electronically to your county?

More Related