dynamical downscaling of climate for the southeast united states
Download
Skip this Video
Download Presentation
Dynamical Downscaling of Climate for the Southeast United States

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 56

Dynamical Downscaling of Climate for the Southeast United States - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 107 Views
  • Uploaded on

Dynamical Downscaling of Climate for the Southeast United States. Lydia Stefanova Center for Ocean-Atmosphere Prediction Studies (COAPS) Florida State University. With contributions from Tim LaRow (FSU/COAPS) and Michelle M. Irizarry-Ortiz and Jayantha Obeysekera (SFWMD). Outline.

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about ' Dynamical Downscaling of Climate for the Southeast United States' - veta


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
dynamical downscaling of climate for the southeast united states

Dynamical Downscaling of Climate for the Southeast United States

Lydia Stefanova

Center for Ocean-Atmosphere Prediction Studies (COAPS)

Florida State University

With contributions from Tim LaRow (FSU/COAPS) and

Michelle M. Irizarry-Ortiz and Jayantha Obeysekera (SFWMD)

outline
Outline
  • La Florida climate downscaling experiments
  • Available data
  • Regional model configuration
  • Results from downscaling of reanalysis: CLARReS data set
  • Preliminary results from a climate change scenario
downscaling experiments
Downscaling Experiments
  • 20 century: 1979-2000 for reanalyses (R2 and ERA-40), 1969-2000 for models (CCSM, GFDL, HadCM3)
  • 21 century: A2 scenario 2039-2070
  • Blue (reanalyses) and Green (climate scenarios): completed
  • Yellow: pending
vegetation scenarios
Vegetation Scenarios

Historical

Present

what is a reanalysis
What is a Reanalysis?

A retroactive "best guess" for the state of the atmosphere based on all available observations and knowledge.

The observations (relatively sparse, and possibly containing errors and thus not necessarily mutually consistent) are assimilated into a dynamical forecast model which is run for a very short time (essentially creating a now-cast) to produce a best estimate for the state of the atmosphere (including variables that are not available from observations, but are derived through the model equations (based on fluid dynamics and physics)) as a spatially and physically consistent gridded data set.

In summary, a reanalysis is our best guess about the atmospheric fields of the recent weather and climate, based on a combination of a) observations and b) modeling knowledge of the physics and dynamics of the atmosphere.

To obtain dynamically downscaling regional reanalysis, the global reanalysis is used to force a regional model

model input and output
Model, Input, and Output
  • Regional Model: National Centers for Environmental Prediction (NCEP)/Experimental Climate Prediction Center (ECPC) Regional Spectral Model (RSM)
  • Input: Global reanalysis (NCEP’s R2 or ECMWF’s ERA-40), atmospheric winds, temperature, humidity, and surface pressure at 6-hourly intervals as lateral boundary conditions.
  • Output: Regionally downscaled reanalysis: COAPS Land-Atmosphere Regional Reanalysis for the Southeast (CLARReS-R2 or CLARReS-ERA40), hourly 2-D variables, 3-hourly 3-D variables
available data
Available Data
  • ftp://ftp.coaps.fsu.edu/pub/Southeast/CLARReS10/
  • Subdirectories: Documentation; ERA-40; R2
  • Data uploaded in netCDF format
  • Request additional variables by emailing [email protected]
domain and model configuration

Chattanooga

Augusta

Charleston

Macon

Montgomery

Savannah

Tallahassee

Daytona

Melbourne

Tampa

West Palm Beach

Miami

Domain and Model Configuration
precipitation
Precipitation
  • Mean: wet bias outside of Florida; wet bias in CLARReS-ERA40 over Everglades; Dry bias over southeast Florida
  • Seasonal cycle: summer precipitation overestimated outside Florida
  • Interannual variability: generally proper sign
  • JJA frequency of rainy days: frequency of precipitation days is generally underestimated in Florida, and overestimated for Georgia, Alabama and South Carolina. The frequency of light events is generally underestimated, while that of heavy events is generally overestimated. Precipitation from tropical cyclones is realistic, provided the storms are present in the global model.
  • Diurnal cycle: Good agreement with observations
annual precipitation rate
Annual Precipitation Rate

Global Reanalysis (R2)

Downscaled Reanalysis (CLARReS-R2)

Observations (PRISM)

mm/day

[PRISM: Oregon State Climate Group data set, gauge-based, uses intelligent interpolation, 4km resolution]

  • Note grid size of global vs downscaled reanalysis: amount of detail
  • Comparable magnitudes. Note different spatial structure and bias.
summer precipitation rate
Summer Precipitation Rate

R2

CLARReS-R2

PRISM

mm/day

Very wet bias in the global reanalysis; reduced but not eliminated in downscaled version; Florida bias less than remainder of domain;

Note that rainfall is not directly downscaled; Instead, the regional model produces its own rain from the atmospheric circulation generated from the winds/temperature/humidity forcing

difference of dry and wet winter month jan 1988 jan1987 mm day
Difference of dry and wet winter month, (Jan 1988-Jan1987) (mm/day)

R2

CLARReS-R2

OBS (UDel)

ERA-40

CLARReS-ЕRА40

OBS (PRISM)

slide16

Difference of dry and wet summer month (Jun 1988-Jun1987) (mm/day)

R2

CLARReS-R2

OBS (UDel)

ERA-40

CLARReS-ЕRА40

OBS (PRISM)

percent jja days with prate 20mm day
Percent JJA days with Prate > 20mm/day

CLARReS-R2

CLARReS-ERA40

Observations (CPC Unified)

diurnal cycle of jja precipitation how is precipitation distributed throughout a typical summer day
Diurnal Cycle of JJA PrecipitationHow is precipitation distributed throughout a typical summer day?
slide25

Time of diurnal maximum, GMT

CLARReS-R2

CLARReS-ЕRА40

(EDT=GMT-4)

OBS

  • Earlier maxima along the coasts (~18-20 GMT = ~2-4PM EDT); later inland (~22-24 GMT=6-8pm EDT)
  • Sea breeze convergence in peninsular Florida
  • Land breeze signature over the water
tropical cyclone associated precipitation inches

Tropical Cyclone Associated Precipitation (inches)

Global Reanalysis

CLARReS

Observation

Global Reanalysis

CLARReS

Observation

tropical cyclone associated precipitation inches1
Tropical Cyclone Associated Precipitation (inches)

Global Reanalysis

CLARReS

Observation

CLARReS

Observation

Global Reanalysis

hurricane andrew 1992 associated precipitation inches
Hurricane Andrew [1992] Associated Precipitation (inches)

Global Model

CLARReS

Observation

Observations from HPC

opal 1995 wind field kts
Opal [1995] Wind Field (kts)

CLARReS-ERA40 (21UTC04Oct1995)

Observed H*Wind

10m Wind Speed

850hPa Wind Speed

slide33

Observed Snow Cover

Satellite Image

12-15 March 1993 “Storm of the Century”

… was an extratropical storm of unusual intensity affecting the Eastern US. Areas as far south as central Alabama and Georgia received 6 to 8 inches of snow. The Florida Penninsula recorded hurricane-force wind gusts and record-low barometric pressure.

CLARReS-R2 (12UTC 13 March 1993)

seasonal cycle for daily average minimum and maximum 2 m temperatures assessment limited to florida
Seasonal Cycle for Daily Average, Minimum and Maximum 2-m Temperatures(Assessment limited to Florida)

Daily average temperature (Tave) is captured very well in both models.

Daily maximum temperature (Tmax):

  • Both models overestimate Tmax across the state especially from Feb-Oct.
  • In both models Lake Okeechobee and areas very close to the coast show lower Tmax than interior areas (not evident in gridded observations). The models are probably correct.

Daily minimum temperature (Tmin):

  • In general, Tmin is overestimated across the state, especially in northern Florida and in the Panhandle area.
  • In both models LOK and areas very close to the coast show higher Tmin than interior areas (higher Tmin over LOK not seen inPRISM or USGS). Models are probably correct.
interannual signal in daily tmin and tmax
Interannual Signal in Daily Tmin and Tmax
  • Interannual variability in the statistical distribution of daily minimum and maximum temperatures
  • Large-scale control from El Nino and La Nina: On average, El Nino winters are colder and wetter than La Nina years.
  • Standard deviation and anomalies
  • Skewness and kurtosis
  • Comparison with COOP station data
daily tmin
Daily Tmin

El Nino (avg. cold and wet)

La Nina (avg. warm and dry)

CLARReS

Station Observations

slide43

Daily Tmax

La Nina (avg. warm and dry)

El Nino (avg. cold and wet)

CLARReS

Station Observations

downscaling of regional reanalises summary
Downscaling of Regional Reanalises: Summary

Precipitation

  • Downscaled reanalysis precipitation has wet bias outside of Florida; wet bias in CLARReS-ERA40 over Everglades; Dry bias over southeast Florida.
  • In Florida, the frequency of heavy rainfall is generally overestimated.
  • The shapes of annual and diurnal cycles are simulated well.
  • The interannual variability is simulated well.
  • Tropical storm precipitation is simulated well provided the storm is well inside the regional domain.

Temperature

  • Tmax and Tmin generally overestimated; Average T generally OK.
  • Interannual variability and higher statistical moments simulated well.

Hourly downscaled data available fromftp://ftp.coaps.fsu.edu/pub/Southeast/CLARReS10/

preliminary results from downscaling of climate projections
Preliminary results from downscaling of climate projections
  • Regional model forced with boundary conditions from the National Center from Environmental Prediction (NCEP) Community Climate System Model (CCSM) simulations.
  • Seasonal means for 1969-1999 subtracted from the seasonal means for 2039-2069.
  • Maximum and minimum daily temperatures (Tmin and Tmax), average daily temperature (Tave), precipitation rate (Prate, mm/day)
downscaling of climate projections summary
Downscaling of Climate ProjectionsSummary

Compared to the 20th century, the 21st century Florida is warmer and drier.

  • Tmax is up by 2-3⁰C in winter, ~3⁰C and more the rest of the year
  • Tmin is up by 1.5-2⁰C
  • Prate is down by 0.25-1 mm/day (3-12 inches/month). (NB: The regionally downscaled CCSM has a strong dry bias, therefore probably underestimates the drying)
ad