1 / 31

PROSECUTORIAL DISCRETION CHANGES – 2011 /2012

PROSECUTORIAL DISCRETION CHANGES – 2011 /2012. What is Prosecutorial Discretion?. Prosecutorial Discretion - core principal in law enforcement, hesitantly used in immigration system Since 2010- issue rose to prominence in immigration

verdad
Download Presentation

PROSECUTORIAL DISCRETION CHANGES – 2011 /2012

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. PROSECUTORIAL DISCRETION CHANGES – 2011 /2012

  2. What is Prosecutorial Discretion? • Prosecutorial Discretion - core principal in law enforcement, hesitantly used in immigration system • Since 2010- issue rose to prominence in immigration • Resources and priorities Issue – backlogs in courts must be reduced by reasonable enforcement

  3. PD Definition • The authority of a law enforcement to decide whether and to what degree to enforce the law • criminal cases - Prosecutors decide whether to bring charges, what charges are appropriate, whether to offer a plea

  4. Prosecutorial Discretion • In immigration cases (civil)under DHS: • ICE exercises discretion on: • stops, • arrests, • detention, • whether to initiate proceedings, • whether to proceed with cases, • whether to execute removal orders, etc. • CIS exercises discretion on: • whether to initiate proceedings

  5. August 2011 Announcement by President Obama and DHS • Establishes high-level joint DHS/DOJ taskforce to: • Review approx. 300,000 cases pending before IJ, BIA and federal courts • Ensure that new removal cases conform to DHS enforcement priorities • Issue guidance on the announcement

  6. Priority in Enforcement • Low priority cases will be administratively closed • While initially announced that such cases would be eligible to apply for EAD, now backtracked – need independent basis • 8 C.F.R. Section 274.12(c)(14) for deferred action, or if have other pending application that provides for EAD eligibility (such as adjustment)

  7. DHS Review • DHS will several months to review all pending cases • ICE attorneys to review cases on their docket “prior to the expenditure of resources” • Request for prosecutorial discretion can be made at time of hearing • Pilots operated in Baltimore and Denver, finished Jan. 13, 2012 (5,000 and 7,000 cases reviewed respectively)

  8. ICE Guidance • June 17, 2010 Morton Memo • Enforcement priorities include: • National Security • Public Safety • Border Security • Repeat Immigration Violators • Recent Border Crossers

  9. ICE Memos • June 17, 2011 ICE Director John Morton issued 2 memos • 1st Memo details • ICE enforcement priorities • Cases appropriate for limited or no enforcement consequences • 2nd Memo specifies • Victims of crimes, witnesses and civil rights litigants deserve special protection

  10. More ICE Memos • Nov. 17, 2011 : ICE OPLA – Case by Case Review of Incoming/Pending cases - includes • Cases on master docket • Cases w/NTAs not yet filed w/EOIR • Non-detained cases w/merits hearings scheduled by 6/17/12

  11. Nov. 17, 2011 ICE Memo • Begin review nationally • make national plan after assessing the two pilot sites in Baltimore/Denver • Advises attorneys to review cases for PD factors in June 17 memo • Draft an operating rule for review (SOP)

  12. Factors to consider: (ICE) • Low priority or positive factors given “prompt and particular care” • Veterans, members of US armed forces • Long time lawful permanent residents • Minors and elderly individuals • Present in the US since childhood • Pregnant or nursing women • Victims of domestic violence, trafficking • Serious mental or physical condition

  13. Guidance to ICE Attorneys • While stating that it incorporates the criteria of the June 17 ICE memo, it also says that high priority removal is directed at: • Those who entered illegally or violated status in the last 3 years; • Prior removals; • Egregious immigration violators; • Fraud cases; • Gang members or others who are threat to public safety; national security risks;

  14. Guidance to ICE Attorneys • High priority removal: • Criminal convictions for • Felony or multiple misdemeanors, • Illegal entry or fraud, or • Misdemeanors for violence, threats or assault; DUIs; sexual abuse; flight from scene of accident; drug trafficking; or other public safety threats.

  15. Guidance to ICE Attorneys • Low priority enforcement/case by case evaluation if: • Armed forces history; • Child in US more than 5 yrs and is in school or completed HS; • Student of higher educ who came to US under age 16, in US more than 5 yrs, HS grad;

  16. Guidance to ICE attorneys • Low priority enforcement: • Victim of domestic violence or crime in US; • LPR ten years or more and has single minor conviction for a non-violent offense; • Person who suffers from serious mental or physical condition requiring treatment in detention; • Person with long term US presence with immediate family who is USC, and compelling ties/contributions here.

  17. Guidance to ICE attorneys • Instructed to evaluate on case-by-case basis, apply totality of the circumstances; • No one factor determinative • All cases also reviewed for national security and public safety concerns

  18. 2 Reviews • 1 – all non detained cases in the two pilot sites of Baltimore/Denver courts • 2 – incoming cases to ICE for evaluation of whether to proceed with NTA • Plan being developed on how to implement existing caseload review nation-wide

  19. Case Review – pilot sites • Trial attorneys review cases for PD factors • Recommend admin closure • Write up proposed motion • Send to Respondent for response • File with court if agrees

  20. Pilot Programs Baltimore/Denver • 12/5/11 – 1/13/12 • Court closed – cases reset to 2014 • Attorneys and respondents could submit materials in support of PD to dedicated email at ICE, Ofc of Chief Counsel • ICE contact with atty in writing with proposed Joint Motion to Admin Close • Pro Se – ICE sends motion and allows response at next hearing

  21. PD – Pilot sites • Review existing cases to determine if any fall within the areas specified in the announcement or memo • Cases currently in removal proceedings • Request admin closure : so far this is the only option ICE has been offering to respondents

  22. Include in Request • Request specific and appropriate form of relief • Outline why discretion appropriate • Highlight positive factors • Demonstrate no adverse factors • Address problem areas • Make request in writing • Provide supporting documents

  23. After Request for PD made: • Decision must be in writing • An administrative closure is not lawful residency • Note: only represented cases provided a channel to supplement requests for PD with documents via dedicated email box

  24. PD Guidance by USCIS • Who will have Notice to Appear issued against them to initiate removal proceedings? • November 7, 2012 USCIS Memo – Revised Guidance for Issuance of Notices to Appear (NTA) – superseded prior guidance from 2006

  25. PD by USCIS • Will issue NTAs for: • Termination of Conditional Residence; • Termination of refugee, asylum, or withholding • Asylum referrals • Positive credible fear findings • And – certain NACARA 202 and 203 cases, HRIFA denials, TPS denials, I-360 denials.

  26. PD by USCIS • Will issue NTAs for: • Cases where fraud is part of the record of findings • Egregious public safety cases • Certain naturalization denials if • Criminal issues allow natz eligibility but removable under Sec. 237; or • Inadmissible at time of entry

  27. USCIS Will Refer to ICE • Egregious public safety cases (EPS) • Cases where inadmissible or deportable for a criminal offense not on EPS list • Cases with NSEERS violations

  28. USCIS Guidance • Offices set up Naturalization review panels to review NTA issues and set up a referral process to ICE within 30 days of the memo

  29. Ongoing Issues • Inconsistency of review criteria • Public education, especially for the pro se • Development of nation-wide plan • Coordination between USCIS, CBP and ICE • More options besides administrative closure are sought (termination, stipulation to relief, etc.)

  30. Ongoing issues with PD • CBP not on same page with ICE criteria • EADs – no avenue unless have independent basis • Deferred Action not being considered by ICE for administrative closure • Detained dockets need review

  31. Resources • AILA’s resources, which are excellent - List at www.aila.org/pd with links to govt memos, guidance, and practice advisories

More Related