How is sexual selection different from natural selection
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
Sponsored Links
1 / 18

How is sexual selection different from natural selection? PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 53 Views
  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

How is sexual selection different from natural selection?. Asexual or selfing population: Survive > grow > reproduce = fitness Outcrossing sexual population: Survive > grow > find a mate > reproduce = fitness. Biological basis of sexual selection.

Download Presentation

How is sexual selection different from natural selection?

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


How is sexual selection different from natural selection

How is sexual selection different from natural selection?

Asexual or selfing population:

Survive > grow > reproduce = fitness

Outcrossing sexual population:

Survive > grow > find a mate > reproduce = fitness


Biological basis of sexual selection

Biological basis of sexual selection

  • Asymmetry of parental investment in offspring (female HI; male LO; anisogamy)

  • Conflict of genetic interests between male and female


Biological basis of sexual selection1

Biological basis of sexual selection

Investment differential varies with mating/rearing strategies

  • Polygamy (polygyny, polyandry)

  • Monogamy

  • No parental care

  • Maternal care only

  • Biparental care

  • Paternal care only


Biological basis of sexual selection2

Biological basis of sexual selection

For the most common mating/rearing systems:

  • Female fitness limited by egg production and/or capacity to rear young

  • Male fitness limited by mating opportunities

  • Bateman experiment (Evolutionary Analysis Fig. 9.4, p. 293)

Angus John Bateman


Bateman experiment

Bateman experiment


Results of sexual selection

Results of sexual selection

For the most common mating/rearing systems:

Females should be CHOOSY

  • Resources (e.g., food, territory)

  • Good genes

  • Sexy sons

    Males should be COMPETITIVE for access to females/eggs

  • Male-male combat

  • Sperm competition

  • Display (colors, vocalizations, ornaments, engineered structures)


Male male combat

Male-male combat

Males are:

  • Larger than females

  • Better armed and armored

    Ritual combat

    Examples:


Sperm competition

Sperm competition

Bill Rice experiment

What is the fate of a mutation that increases male competitiveness even if it is at the expense of long-term survival and reproduction of his mate?


Sperm competition1

Sperm competition

Bill Rice experiment:

  • Males and females have inherent conflicts of genetic interest

  • Genes that increase male fitness may be deleterious (even lethal) to their mates

  • The ‘battle of the sexes’ is a coevolutionary process


Male display

Male display

Ornamentation

Lekking


Looking for mr goodbar or how do females exercise choice

Looking for Mr. Goodbaror,How do females exercise choice?

  • Resources (e.g., food, territory)

  • Good genes

  • Sexy sons

  • Manipulation of offspring sex ratio

  • Extra-pair copulations in ‘monogamous’ females


Direct acquisition of resources

Direct acquisition of resources

Male entices female with:

Food

Territory


Good genes

Good genes

William Hamilton

  • Greater size, enhanced color, louder/more complex vocalization, larger ornaments reflect general health and vigor

    Amotz Zahavi

  • Ornament as handicap

  • ‘Harrison Bergeron effect’


Sexy sons

Sexy sons

R.A. Fisher’s ‘runaway sexual selection’ hypothesis

  • Genetic variation for male trait and female preference for that trait

  • Female increases her fitness (= no. of grandchildren) disproportionately by producing attractive sons

  • Male trait and female preference lead to assortative mating

  • A genetic correlation between the male trait and female preference is established -- how?

  • In each generation the female preference applies strong directional selection on the male trait to become more exaggerated, even if the trait has no adaptive value, and the correlated female preference also becomes exaggerated


Gender bias in red deer

Gender bias in red deer

Red deer (Cervus elaphus - elk/wapiti) on the island of Rum in Scotland

Studied continuously by Tim Clutton-Brock and his associates since 1971

Polygynous ‘harem’ mating system; stags (males) lek

Dominance hierarchy among hinds (females)


Gender bias in red deer1

Gender bias in red deer

Dominant hinds produce more sons than daughters. Since sex ratio is supposed to be under frequency-dependent selection with a 1 male:1 female stable optimum, what is going on?


Extra pair copulation in monagamous females

Extra-pair copulation in ‘monagamous’ females

How might a ‘monogamous’ female benefit from extra-pair copulation?


  • Login