Second Exam:
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
Sponsored Links
1 / 21

Second Exam: revised exam date: Thursday 4/11/2002 (instead of 4/9/2002) PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 78 Views
  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

Second Exam: revised exam date: Thursday 4/11/2002 (instead of 4/9/2002) study guide handed out today (answers on Thursday 4/4/2002) covers Ch4-9 and Homework 4-8 (homework 8 will be handed out on Thursday 4/4/2002) back copies of old homework and answers available.

Download Presentation

Second Exam: revised exam date: Thursday 4/11/2002 (instead of 4/9/2002)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


Second exam revised exam date thursday 4 11 2002 instead of 4 9 2002

  • Second Exam:

  • revised exam date: Thursday 4/11/2002 (instead of 4/9/2002)

  • study guide handed out today (answers on Thursday 4/4/2002)

  • covers Ch4-9 and Homework 4-8

  • (homework 8 will be handed out on Thursday 4/4/2002)

  • back copies of old homework and answers available

  • Topics for paper:

  • guide to select a topic was handed out 3/18/2002 -

  • Old homework and exams:

  • if not picked up will be discarded at end of week


Second exam revised exam date thursday 4 11 2002 instead of 4 9 2002

Physics 371

April 2, 2002

Acoustics for Musicians

  • Room Acoustics (cont)

  • smoothness of decay, diffusers

  • early reflection, canopies

  • bad and good concert halls:

  • criteria and shape of hall

  • (“shoe box”, “vineyard terrace”)

  • noise reduction

  • Excitation of steady tones

New Tokyo Opera


Second exam revised exam date thursday 4 11 2002 instead of 4 9 2002

decay ~20dB in 0.4 s

reverberation time RT ~ 1.2 s

smooth decay of reverb: good


Second exam revised exam date thursday 4 11 2002 instead of 4 9 2002

undesirable echo


Second exam revised exam date thursday 4 11 2002 instead of 4 9 2002

Good room acoustics: Strong earlylateral reflection

direct sound:

same signal in both ears

lateral reflection:

difference in intensity

in L and R ear and

difference arrival time!


Second exam revised exam date thursday 4 11 2002 instead of 4 9 2002

Birmingham, U.K: large adjustable canopy over orchestra

increases early reflection + adds to performer satisfaction


Second exam revised exam date thursday 4 11 2002 instead of 4 9 2002

Shape of concert halls: the classic “shoe box” hall

Vienna Musikverein Saal (1870) - RT 2.05 sec.

used by J. Brahms, A. Bruckner and G.Mahler


Second exam revised exam date thursday 4 11 2002 instead of 4 9 2002

Symphony Hall, Boston (1900)- good “show box”:

dimensions 45m long, 24m wide, 17m high

early lateral reflection: distance to side wall 12m = 35msec

shallow balconies.

reverb time (1000Hz) 2.05 sec

example: calculate average absorption of walls

2.05 sec = 0.161V/A A = Saave

V = 18740 m3 -> A = 1472 m2

surface area of walls, ceiling, floor approx S=4500 m2

thus ave absorption of walls a= A/S = 1472/4500 = 0.32

example of application: what is effect of carpeting the aisles?

a increases from 0.03 (concrete) to 0.37 (heavy carpet

on concrete) over about 15% of floor area (homework)


Second exam revised exam date thursday 4 11 2002 instead of 4 9 2002

Another “shoe box”: Royal Festival Hall London (1951) 3000 seats

elevated stage, shallow balconies


Second exam revised exam date thursday 4 11 2002 instead of 4 9 2002

“Fan-shaped” halls are rareley very good:

lack of intense lateral reflections (Liverpool Philharmonic)


Second exam revised exam date thursday 4 11 2002 instead of 4 9 2002

New Ideas: Vineyard Terrace

(e.g. Berlin Philharmonic - Hans Sharoun, Architect)

advantage: more seats close to stage - more direct sound


Second exam revised exam date thursday 4 11 2002 instead of 4 9 2002

Berlin Philharmonic


Second exam revised exam date thursday 4 11 2002 instead of 4 9 2002

among the famous failures: NY Philharmonic 1962

16M$ + 2M$ in attempted improvements -

problems related to:

bulging concave side walls to provide more

seating

elimination of sound-diffusing elements ($)

sound absorption by plywood panels on balconies

led to understanding of need for early lateral

reflection

(rebuilt as Avery Fisher Hall 1974)


Second exam revised exam date thursday 4 11 2002 instead of 4 9 2002

“Electronic Enhancement” of Concert Halls

  • compensate lack of loudness at rear of hall and , improve uniformity

  • loudspeakers permit fine tuning of room acoustics

  • provides some flexibility for different performances

  • difficult: audience should be unaware of it

  • essential: direct sound must come first! (delay speaker signal)

  • for speech: directional speakers toward audience improves intelligibility


Second exam revised exam date thursday 4 11 2002 instead of 4 9 2002

Unwanted background sounds and vibration:


Second exam revised exam date thursday 4 11 2002 instead of 4 9 2002

Examples of noise suppression:

Bridgewater concert

hall in Manchester,

England is immediately

adjacent to a railroad

track

The entire building is

supported on shock

absorbers


Second exam revised exam date thursday 4 11 2002 instead of 4 9 2002

  • Suppression of ventilation system noise:

  • large ducts (low air velocity)

  • flexible coupling

  • new: electronic noise cancellation

  • electronic noise compensation

  • useful for periodic noise


Second exam revised exam date thursday 4 11 2002 instead of 4 9 2002

  • known elements of successful concert hall design:

  • loud sound, early lateral reflection, smooth reverberation

  • solid construction: walls of concrete and plaster on wire lath

  • yields good bass reflection (“warmth)

  • strong lateral reflection yields “envelopment”

  • short initial time delay gap yields “intimacy”

  • direct path from source to listener gives “presence”

  • raised musician platform, raked seating, raked shallow balconies,

  • careful placement of diffuser improves uniformity

  • attention to construction details (including noise reduction)

  • use electronic enhancement sparingly

  • models are of benefit

  • advantages of computer design(“rational design”) still disputed

  • ….but anotherproblem:

  • how objective is the quality judgment of concert halls?


Second exam revised exam date thursday 4 11 2002 instead of 4 9 2002

Importance of concert hall acoustics

for composers, conductors and musicians

different composers (and conductors) prefer different acoustics

examples: Mozart, Beethoven preferred to conduct in

Wiener Hofburg with 1.4 sec reverberation time

Brahms, Bruckner Mahler preferred Musikvereinsaal

Vienna with 2.1 sec reverberation time.

Wagner assisted in acoustic design of Bayreuth Theater

Insertion of galleries in Thomaskirche, Leipzig reduced

reverb time. This permitted articulation of fast passages

-> resulted in Bach Mass in B-minor and St.Mathew Passion.


Second exam revised exam date thursday 4 11 2002 instead of 4 9 2002

Performers and Conductors

consider problem that audience does not hear the same

as the preformers

examples: directionality of sound

Bruckner 4th Symphony asks for “raised trumpets”

makes 15 dB difference!

Sound reflection off floor can make important difference

Arrangement of instruments in orchestra


  • Login