1 / 18

The pp→pp 0  0 reaction and its limiting case, the fusion to quasibound ,

The pp→pp 0  0 reaction and its limiting case, the fusion to quasibound , in search of ABC effect. T. Skorodko, University Tuebingen for CELSIUS-WASA. ► motivation and detector setup ► results and discussions ► summary and outlook. ABC effect. WASA-at-COSY. M=2360 MeV.

valora
Download Presentation

The pp→pp 0  0 reaction and its limiting case, the fusion to quasibound ,

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. The pp→pp00 reactionand its limiting case, the fusion to quasibound , in search of ABC effect T. Skorodko, University Tuebingen for CELSIUS-WASA ► motivation and detector setup ► results and discussions ► summary and outlook

  2. ABC effect WASA-at-COSY M=2360 MeV =90 MeV preliminary  (t-channel) Roper

  3. “ABC” effect in ANKE data S.Dymov et al., PRL 102, 192301 (2009) 0.8 GeV pp→{pp}SX 1.1 GeV phase space selection: Epp < 3 MeV, cosθpp > 0.95 1.4 GeV 2 GeV

  4. “ABC” effect in ANKE data pp→{pp}SX S.Dymov et al., PRL 102, 192301 (2009) selection: Epp < 3 MeV, cosθpp > 0.95 1100 MeV 1400 MeV Mx [GeV/c2] only S-wave amplitude • final {pp} in • asume S-wave in  •  initial protons in or  only D-wave amplitude S- and D-wave amplitudes

  5. Oservation of an “ABC” effect in proton-proton collisions S.Dymov et al., PRL 102, 192301 (2009) pp→{pp}SX  “If ABC is not a resonance, it does not have to have a definite isospin …”  “… pp→{pp}SX kinematics are very similar to those of pn→d00 and so a comparison with CELSIUS-WASA data is instructive”  “… pp→{pp}SX kinematics are very similar to those of pn→d00 and so a comparison with CELSIUS-WASA data is instructive”  “… we certainly have no evidence for an I=1 dibaryon …”

  6. pp→pp00 at 4 CELSIUS-WASA detector Tp = 775, 895, 1000, 1100, 1200, 1300, 1360 MeV γ γ p p γ γ

  7. p0p0production  N* →Ns CELSIUS-WASA N* →Dp N* →Dp N* →Ns  L.Alvarez-Ruso et al., Nucl. Phys. A 633 (1998), 519

  8. 00 production at Tp < 1 GeV A(tot)  A(N*→N)+A(N*→) Valencia model Tp=0.795 GeV COSY-TOF All theoretical curves are normalized in area to the data Tp=0.895 GeV At Roper mass M=1440 MeV

  9. 00 production at Tp > 1 GeV Tp = 1 GeV Tp = 1.1 GeV Tp = 1.2 GeV Tp = 1.3 GeV VC with readjusted N→ branch

  10. 00 production at Tp > 1 GeV Tp = 1 GeV Tp = 1.1 GeV Tp = 1.2 GeV Tp = 1.3 GeV VC with readjusted N*→ branch VC with readjusted total N* strength (T. Skorodko et al., Phys.Lett. B 679 (2009) 30)

  11. 00 production at Tp > 1 GeV modification of the  excitation  include relativistic corrections • reduce the contribution from ρ-exchange in  excitation by an order of magnitude (Xu Cao et al., nucl-th:1004.0140, today plenary session)

  12. 00 production at Tp > 1 GeV Tp = 1 GeV Tp = 1.1 GeV Tp = 1.2 GeV Tp = 1.3 GeV VC with readjusted N→ branch VC with readjusted total N* strength and with modified  excitation VC with readjusted total N* strength

  13. Total pp→pp00 cross section original VC VC with readjusted N→ branch VC with readjusted total N* strength VC with readjusted total N* strength and with modified  excitation

  14. Comparison ANKE data with modified VC VC with readjusted total N* strength and with modified  excitation (ANKE cuts)

  15. CELSIUS-WASA data with Mpp < 10 MeV cut VC with readjusted total N* strength and with modified  excitation (Mpp < 10 MeV cut)

  16. Conclusions pp00 production can be described by a conventional t-channel  calculations with small contribution from ρ-exchange no evidence is found for a significant ABC effect (no low mass enhancement in M) since pp00 is isospin I=1 channel, it is not instructive to compare these data with isospin I=0 pn→d00 data

  17. Outlook ABC pn→pn00 WASA-at-COSY p+(nps) at Tp=1.0 GeV Tp Tp p+(nps) at Tp=1.2 GeV

  18. Thank you

More Related