Evaluating toe
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
Sponsored Links
1 / 12

Evaluating TOE PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 48 Views
  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

Evaluating TOE. Common Evaluation Methodology (CEM). A method of applying the CC requirements consistently and uniformly during evaluation of TOE Describes the minimum actions that an evaluator must perform in order to conduct an evaluation of a PP, ST, and TOE. Principles of Evaluation.

Download Presentation

Evaluating TOE

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


Evaluating toe

Evaluating TOE


Common evaluation methodology cem

Common Evaluation Methodology (CEM)

  • A method of applying the CC requirements consistently and uniformly during evaluation of TOE

  • Describes the minimum actions that an evaluator must perform in order to conduct an evaluation of a PP, ST, and TOE


Principles of evaluation

Principles of Evaluation

  • Appropriateness – Evaluators will perform their duties to meet their responsibilities as consistent with the targeted EAL

  • Impartiality – Evaluator’s evaluation will be impartial without any conflicts of interest

  • Objectivity – Evaluator’s will perform their duties with minimum subjectivity or opinion

  • Repeatability and reproducibility – Evaluators will achieve the same results given the same TOE and supporting evidence

  • Soundness of results – Results will be complete and accurate


Parties involved in the evaluation process

Parties involved in the evaluation process

  • Sponsor –

    • User, industry group, government or other entities that want a product evaluated

    • Responsible for establishing the agreements necessary to perform the evaluation

    • Support the evaluator (evaluation evidence, training and other support)

    • Funds the process


Parties involved in the evaluation process1

Parties involved in the evaluation process

  • Developer

    • Actual producer of the TOE

    • Supports evaluation by producing and maintaining the evaluation evidence


Parties involved in the evaluation process2

Parties involved in the evaluation process

  • Evaluator

    • Laboratory certified by the overseer

    • Performs duties as specified by the CC

    • Receives the evaluation evidence

    • Requests and receives support from the overseer

    • Documents with supporting evidence the overall verdict and any conditional verdicts.


Parties involved in the evaluation process3

Parties involved in the evaluation process

  • Overseer

    • Validation body. CC organization of the country

    • Assures through use of an appointed validator

    • Provides guidance and interpretations of the CC

    • Approves or disapproves the overall verdict


Evaluation process preparation phase

Evaluation Process – Preparation Phase

  • Sponsor contacts the evaluator to begin process of evaluation under the CC

  • Sponsor or developer supplies the evaluators the evaluation deliverables,

  • Feasibility study is conducted to develop

    • List of evaluation deliverables

    • list of evaluation activities,

    • sampling requirements in CC that the evaluation will address

  • Sponsors and evaluators sign an agreement to establish the framework for evaluation


Evaluation process conduct phase

Evaluation Process – Conduct Phase

  • Evaluator develops the evaluation actions based on the deliverables

  • Evaluator may write observation report (OR) to seek clarification from the overseer

  • Evaluator may identify a potential weakness and seek additional information from the developer or sponsor


Conclusion phase

Conclusion phase

  • Evaluator gives the Evaluation technical report (ETR) to the overseer


Evaluator verdicts

Evaluator verdicts

  • Pass: Requirements for the PP, ST or TOE are met

  • Fail: Requirements for the PP, ST or TOE have not been met

  • Inconclusive: Default status until the evaluator either passes or fails the product.

    • All constituent verdicts must pass to receive an overall pass verdict.


Evaluation technical report etr

Evaluation Technical Report (ETR)

  • ETR is used to justify the verdict of the evaluator


  • Login