Lecture 2
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
Sponsored Links
1 / 37

Lecture 2 PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 91 Views
  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

A. Nitzan, Tel Aviv University ELECTRON TRANSFER AND TRANSMISSION IN MOLECULES AND MOLECULAR JUNCTIONS AEC, Grenoble, Sept 2005. Lecture 2. Grenoble Sept 2005. (1) Relaxation and reactions in condensed molecular systems Kinetic models Transition state theory

Download Presentation

Lecture 2

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


Lecture 2

A. Nitzan, Tel Aviv University

ELECTRON TRANSFER AND TRANSMISSION IN MOLECULES AND MOLECULAR JUNCTIONS

AEC, Grenoble, Sept 2005

Lecture 2


Lecture 2

Grenoble Sept 2005

  • (1) Relaxation and reactions in condensed molecular systems

  • Kinetic models

  • Transition state theory

  • Kramers theory and its extensions

  • Low, high and intermediate friction regimes

  • Diffusion controlled reactions

Coming March 2006

Chapter 13-15


Molecular vibrational relaxation

Molecular vibrational relaxation


Frequency dependent friction

Frequency dependent friction

MARKOVIAN LIMIT

WIDE BAND APPROXIMATION


Dielectric solvation

Dielectric solvation

Born solvation energy


Continuum dielectric theory of solvation

Continuum dielectric theory of solvation

WATER:

tD=10 ps tL=125 fs


Electron solvation

Electron solvation

Quantum solvation

(1) Increase in the kinetic energy (localization) – seems NOT to affect dynamics

(2) Non-adiabatic solvation (several electronic states involved)


Activated rate processes

Activated rate processes

Diffusion controlled rates

KRAMERS THEORY:

Low friction limit

High friction limit

Transition State theory


The physics of transition state rates

The physics of transition state rates

Assume:

(1) Equilibrium in the well

(2) Every trajectory on the barrier that goes out makes it

THIS IS AN UPPER BOUND ON THE ACTUAL RATE!

Quantum barrier crossing:


Lecture 2

PART B

Electron transfer


Lecture 2

Grenoble Sept 2005

  • (2) Electron transfer processes

  • Simple models

  • Marcus theory

  • The reorganization energy

  • Adiabatic and non-adiabatic limits

  • Solvent controlled reactions

  • Bridge assisted electron transfer

  • Coherent and incoherent transfer

  • Electrode processes

Coming March 2006

Chapter 16


Theory of electron transfer

Theory of Electron Transfer

  • Activation energy

  • Transition probability

  • Rate – Transition state theory

Transition rate

  • Rate – Solvent controlled

  • NOTE: “solvent controlled” is the term used in this field for the Kramers low friction limit.


Electron transfer in polar media

Electron transfer in polar media

  • Electron are much faster than nuclei

  •  Electronic transitions take place in fixed nuclear configurations

  •  Electronic energy needs to be conserved during the change in electronic charge density

Electronic transition

Nuclear relaxation


Lecture 2

Electron transfer

Nuclear motion

Nuclear motion

Electron transition takes place in unstable nuclear configurations obtained via thermal fluctuations


Electron transfer

Electron transfer

Solvent polarization coordinate


Transition state theory of electron transfer

Transition state theory of electron transfer

Alternatively – solvent control

Adiabatic and non-adiabatic ET processes

Landau-Zener problem

(For diabatic surfaces (1/2)KR2)


Solvent controlled electron transfer

Solvent controlled electron transfer

Correlation between the fluorescence lifetime and the longitudinal dielectric relaxation time, of 6-N-(4-methylphenylamino-2-naphthalene-sulfon-N,N-dimethylamide) (TNSDMA) and 4-N,N-dimethylaminobenzonitrile (DMAB) in linear alcohol solvents. The fluorescence signal is used to monitor an electron transfer process that precedes it. The line is drawn with a slope of 1. (From E. M. Kosower and D. Huppert, Ann. Rev. Phys. Chem. 37, 127 (1986))


Electron transfer marcus theory

Electron transfer – Marcus theory

We are interested in changes in solvent configuration that take place at constant solute charge distribution 

They have the following characteristics:

(1) Pn fluctuates because of thermal motion of solvent nuclei.

(2) Pe , as a fast variable, satisfies the equilibrium relationship

(3) D= constant (depends on  only)

Note that the relations E = D-4P; P=Pn + Pe are always satisfied per definition, however D sE. (the latter equality holds only at equilibrium).


Electron transfer marcus theory1

Electron transfer – Marcus theory

Free energy associated with a nonequilibrium fluctuation of Pn

q

“reaction coordinate” that characterizes the nuclear polarization


The marcus parabolas

The Marcus parabolas

Use q as a reaction coordinate. It defines the state of the medium that will be in equilibrium with the charge distribution rq. Marcus calculated the free energy (as function of q) of the solvent when it reaches this state in the systems q =0 and q=1.


Electron transfer activation energy

Electron transfer: Activation energy

Reorganization energy

Activation energy


Electron transfer effect of driving energy gap

Electron transfer: Effect of Driving (=energy gap)


Lecture 2

Experimental confirmation of the inverted regime

Marcus papers 1955-6

Miller et al, JACS(1984)

Marcus Nobel Prize: 1992


Electron transfer the coupling

Electron transfer – the coupling

  • From Quantum Chemical Calculations

  • The Mulliken-Hush formula

  • Bridge mediated electron transfer


Bridge assisted electron transfer

Bridge assisted electron transfer

EB


Effective donor acceptor coupling

Effective donor-acceptor coupling


Marcus expresions for non adiabatic et rates

Donor-to-Bridge/ Acceptor-to-bridge

Bridge Green’s Function

Franck-Condon-weighted DOS

Reorganization energy

Marcus expresions for non-adiabatic ET rates


Bridge mediated et rate

Bridge mediated ET rate

b’ (Å-1)=

0.2-0.6 for highly conjugated chains

0.9-1.2 for saturated hydrocarbons

~ 2 for vacuum


Bridge mediated et rate1

Bridge mediated ET rate

Charge recombination lifetimes in the compounds shown in the inset in dioxane solvent. (J. M. Warman et al, Adv. Chem. Phys. Vol 106, 1999). The process starts with a photoinduced electron transfer – a charge separation process. The lifetimes shown are for the back electron transfer (charge recombination) process.


Incoherent hopping

constant

Incoherent hopping

STEADY STATE SOLUTION


Et rate from steady state hopping

ET rate from steady state hopping


Dependence on temperature

Dependence on temperature

The integrated elastic (dotted line) and activated (dashed line) components of the transmission, and the total transmission probability (full line) displayed as function of inverse temperature. Parameters are as in Fig. 3.


The photosythetic reaction center

The photosythetic reaction center

Michel - Beyerle et al


Dependence on bridge length

Dependence on bridge length


Dna giese et al 2001

DNA (Giese et al 2001)


Steady state evaluation of rates

Steady state evaluation of rates

  • Rate of water flow depends linearly on water height in the cylinder

  • Two ways to get the rate of water flowing out:

  • Measure h(t) and get the rate coefficient from k=(1/h)dh/dt

  • Keep h constant and measure the steady state outwards water flux J. Get the rate from k=J/h

  • = Steady state rate

h


  • Login