Rapid changes in the longitudinal magnetic field associated with the july 23 2002 gamma ray flare
Download
1 / 10

Vasyl Yurchyshyn, Haimin Wang, Valentyna Abramenko, Thomas J. Spirock and S ä m Krucker - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 110 Views
  • Uploaded on

Rapid Changes in the Longitudinal Magnetic Field Associated with the July 23 2002 gamma -ray Flare. Vasyl Yurchyshyn, Haimin Wang, Valentyna Abramenko, Thomas J. Spirock and S ä m Krucker Big Bear Solar Observatory, Big Bear City, CA 92314

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about ' Vasyl Yurchyshyn, Haimin Wang, Valentyna Abramenko, Thomas J. Spirock and S ä m Krucker' - valentine-mcgee


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
Rapid changes in the longitudinal magnetic field associated with the july 23 2002 gamma ray flare

Rapid Changes in the Longitudinal Magnetic Field Associated with the July 23 2002 gamma-ray Flare

Vasyl Yurchyshyn, Haimin Wang, Valentyna Abramenko,

Thomas J. Spirock and Säm Krucker

Big Bear Solar Observatory, Big Bear City, CA 92314

Space Sciences Lab, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720


Introduction
Introduction with

Earlier studies report on flare related variations in the magnetic field:

  • local changes associated with the major polarity inversion line (Severny 1964; Zvereva&Severny 1970; Moore et al. 1984; Wang&Tang 1993; Wang et al. 1994; Kosovichev&Zharkova 1999, 2001; Spirock et al. 2002; Wang et al. 2002)

  • changes of magnetic shear (Chen et al. 1994, Wang et al. 1994, Hagyard et al. 1999)

  • global changes, when both the photospheric and the coronal field of an active region are involved in a flare (van Driel-Gesztelyi et al. 1997, Aschwanden et al. 1999; Abramenko et al. 2003).

    Wang et al. (2002) studied six X-class flares and found impulsive and permanent changes in the magnetic flux during the flares, which were not balanced:

    the leading flux always increased while the following tended to decrease.

    Spirock, Yurchyshyn and Wang (2002) and Wang et al. (2002) explained the unbalanced flux increase by several possible mechanisms:

    i) emergence of a very inclined flux tube,

    ii) change of the orientation of the magnetic field and

    iii) expansion of the preceding sunspot as a result of the relaxation of the magnetic field after a flare.


Goal of the study
Goal of the Study with

In the present paper we will show that the first two mechanisms (new flux

emergence and the orientation and/or inclination) may indeed be

responsible for the observed changes.

We will analyze Halpha, magnetograph and X-ray data for the 2002 July 23 gamma-ray flare, which occurred in Active Region NOAA 0039. It was a long duration event that peaked around 0028UT. We will focus here on the evolution of the magnetic field associated with the flare.

To understand the changes that the magnetic field underwent during the early phase of the flare, we reconstruct basic signatures of a 3D coronal magnetic field by using a linear force-free field extrapolation model.


The 2002 july 23 gamma ray flare
The 2002 July 23 with Gamma-ray Flare

BBSO H at 00:27 UT

BBSO DMG at 00:37 UT

Contours are RHESSI 12-20 keV (red) and 100-150 keV (blue)

HXR emission, which dominated above 30 keV, was related to the photospheric foot points, while at lower energy range a gradual coronal HXR source had been found (Krucker, Hurford and Lin 2003).

BBSO H at 00:27 UT


Magnetic flux from soho mdi
Magnetic Flux From SOHO/MDI with

The flux time profiles are plotted for

the following (positive) and the leading

(negative) polarity by the thin solid

lines.

Immediately after the flare (at 0047UT,

the right vertical dashed line) the total

following (positive) flux decreased by

about 14%, while the total leading flux

increased by approximately 6%.

These changes were permanent and

the flux did not return back to the pre-

flare level after the flare ended.

Bold lines are RHESSI flux in the 100 to 150 keV energy range


Magnetograms from bbso dmg
Magnetograms From BBSO/DMG with

BBSO: the leading (S) flux up by about 5%, while the following (N) flux down by about 13% (The corresponding MDI flux changes are 6% and 14%).

Circled area: the northern HXR source at the flare onset; the peak intensity increased from 800Gs to -1100Gs; S flux up by 30%; the penumbral bridge became wider (compared the red contours); the transverse field has changed orientation. New flux emergence?

Boxed area: the northern HXR source and the foot points of the PFL system in the late phase of the flare; S flux up threefold; the transverse field has changed orientation . Change in the inclination?


Magnetic flux changes from simulated data
Magnetic Flux Changes From Simulated Data with

The simulated magnetogram contains an “S”-shaped NL and, projected on the east limb, it resembles the observed magnetogram.

A pre- (a=-0.025 arcsec-1) and a post-flare (a=-0.001 arcsec-1) magnetic field was simulated by matching general curvature of the calculated field lines to the observed Ha fibrils and post-flare loops.

The magnetograms were projected at the east solar limb (l=-65°) and the line-of-sight components were determined.

The leading (S) flux increased by 24%, while the following (N) flux decreased by about 59%. Note, that the observed data gives 6% and 14%, respectively.

The flux variations in the simulated line-of-sight magnetograms are due to changes in the inclination and/or orientation of the magnetic field.


What Can We Learn with From the Fact That

i) the magnetic flux

and

ii) the inclination of the magnetic field

change rapidly during a major flare?


Magnetic flux changes and flare models
Magnetic Flux Changes and Flare Models with

flux rope models – eruption of a pre-existing (in equilibrium) flux rope and a gradual (~ 1-2 hours) reconnection process

erupted flux rope

reconnection

reconnection models – rapid formation of an unstable flux rope by reconnection between sheared arcades

erupted flux rope

sheared arcades

reconnection

Figures courtesy of Amari et al. 2003, ApJ, 585, 1073


Summary
Summary with

We presented study on rapid changes in the magnetic field associated with the July 23, 2002 gamma-ray flare.

MDI and BBSO data showed that immediately after the flare the leading polarity of the magnetic field had increased by 2x1020 Mx (6%), while the following polarity decreased by 1x1020 Mx (20%). The observed changes were permanent and seem not to be caused by variations in the profile of the spectral lines that were used to measure magnetic fields.

We distinguish two separate locations, which show the most dramatic changes in the magnetic field.

  • a location, which was most probably associated with new flux emergence and it showed an increase in the magnetic field and a new penumbral area

  • a location, which coincided with foot points of a growing post-flare loop system and it showed a shift of the neutral line in longitudinal magnetograms.

    Linear force-free field simulations showed that the re-orientation of the magnetic field was capable of producing the observed changes in the total magnetic flux.


ad