1 / 10

Revenue Laws Amendment Bill 2002

Revenue Laws Amendment Bill 2002. Representations and comments to the Portfolio Committee on Finance Tuesday, 29 October 2002. The p rocess and overview.

uttara
Download Presentation

Revenue Laws Amendment Bill 2002

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Revenue Laws Amendment Bill 2002 Representations and comments to the Portfolio Committee on Finance Tuesday, 29 October 2002

  2. The process and overview • Time constraints – 6½ working days to comment on 190 pages of draft legislation (excluding 74 pages of explanatory memo), including wholly new sections. • Sufficient time for Committee to adequately fulfill its role? • Need for middle ground to allow amendment of sections without the all or nothing approach. • High number of amendments again do not contribute to tax certainty.

  3. The process and overview • A number of the proposed changes are highly technical in nature therefore we intend to address only the following headline areas with summaries of main concerns: • International issues • Expatriates and currency rules • Corporate reorganisations • Miscellaneous (both those proposed in draft Bill and further amendments suggested by PwC)

  4. Basic international changes • Application of SA transfer pricing to CFCs (see Appendix of comparison of SA to other territories). • Exempting provisions can actually work against the taxpayer – need to be elective to avoid double taxation. • Removal of exemption in S9D(9)(f) on basis covered by participation exemption not wholly accurate. • Application of 5% rule to listed companies.

  5. Expatriates and currency rules • SA still has a need to attract expatriate workers. • Current tax law can discourage this and shorten international assignments. • Consideration needed as a matter of urgency, may need policy change not possible here, but can a short term fix be implemented?

  6. Corporate reorganisations • Availability of rollover to only inherent gain assets has undesirable side effects: • Effective elimination of losses • Transfer tax relief not available • Double taxation on capital gains exists in applying company formations and share for share transactions. • SA acquirer may end up with no base cost on assets acquired from overseas group companies. • Relief from STC needed post a reorganisation (i.e. S64B(5)(f) needs to be expanded).

  7. Corporate reorganisations • Provision needs to be made that transfer taxes relief still available when rollovers not claimed (or partially claimed). • Relief from donations tax to be clarified. • Require expansion to facilitate taking foreign investments back to direct SA ownership through a chain of overseas companies. • Infinite clawback provision as regards intra-group transactions too onerous. • Certain reliefs still mandatory.

  8. Corporate reorganisations • Need for reliefs to permit issuance of shares in other group company, or to drop the 18-month restrictions. • To drop 18-month rule in respect of insurers covered by S29A. • To drop 18-month rule as regards trading stock. • Current proposals ring fence greater gains than are justified. • De-minimus cash limit required to allow transaction costs to be met. • No provision for other tax attributes to pass.

  9. Miscellaneous • Apparent elimination of capital gains – surely unintended but indicative of issues arising from tight timescale. • Base cost of assets acquired by issuance of shares to be provided for. • Timing of deemed disposal for capital gains purposes on becoming a resident to be clarified. • Consequential amendments to UST and VAT Acts needed as a result of changes to corporate reorganisations.

  10. Miscellaneous • Relief from stamp duty needed where transfer duty applies. • Introduction of joint and several liability concept is a significant departure from taxpayers being liable for their own tax only and represents a dangerous precedent. • Amendment to dividend wording ambiguous and needs to be clarified – intent of SARS and National Treasury as put forward to the Committee by Mr Louw and Professor Engel welcomed. • Right of objection and appeal should be to all circumstances where Commissioner has discretion.

More Related