Resident Continuity of Care Experience:
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
Sponsored Links
1 / 32

Dr. A. Melck, Dr. E. Webber, Dr. R. Sidhu Association for Surgical Education PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 65 Views
  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

Resident Continuity of Care Experience: A Casualty of Current Healthcare Delivery, Not Work Hour Restrictions. Dr. A. Melck, Dr. E. Webber, Dr. R. Sidhu Association for Surgical Education March 25, 2006 – Tucson, AZ. Background.

Download Presentation

Dr. A. Melck, Dr. E. Webber, Dr. R. Sidhu Association for Surgical Education

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


Dr a melck dr e webber dr r sidhu association for surgical education

Resident Continuity of Care Experience:A Casualty of Current Healthcare Delivery, Not Work Hour Restrictions

Dr. A. Melck, Dr. E. Webber, Dr. R. Sidhu

Association for Surgical Education

March 25, 2006 – Tucson, AZ


Background

Background

  • The importance of continuity of care in medical education has been well-documented.

  • Continuity of care leads to more knowledgeable patients, better patient satisfaction, and improved compliance with selected treatment regimens.*

    *(Rogers J et al. Am J Public Health 1980)


Dr a melck dr e webber dr r sidhu association for surgical education

Decision-making

Compassion

Technical Skill

Communication


Background1

Background

  • Exemplary surgical care requires astute pre-, intra- and post-operative decision-making skills.

  • Surgical residents must gain this expertise by experiencing the impact of their decisions.


Background2

Background

“…have recognition of responsibility for the overall care of the surgical patient.”


Background3

Background

“…actively participated in making or confirming the diagnosis, selecting the appropriate operative plan, and administering preoperative and post-operative care”

THE AMERICAN BOARD OF SURGERY


Background william s halsted

BackgroundWilliam S. Halsted

  • introduced German model of residency training in the early 1900s

  • emphasis on graded responsibility and inpatients

    (Hamdorf JM et al. Br J Surg 2000)


Background4

Background

  • Over the past century:

    • Little change in the fundamental structure of training programs, BUT

    • Substantial change to healthcare delivery


Background changes in healthcare delivery

Background: Changes in Healthcare Delivery

  • same day admission for surgery

  • ambulatory surgery

  • limitations on resident work hours

  • limited operating room resources


Background5

Background

“…leaders of academic medicine must bebetter prepared to address an array of very serious challenges...I find that very few (journals) publish articlesthat address those challenges…”

Michael E. Whitcomb, MD, Editor

June, 2005


Objectives

Objectives

  • To define the current continuity of care experience of general surgery residents in a Canadian training program.

  • To delineate the patient, resident, and hospital factors influencing this experience.


Methods

Methods

  • REB-approved, prospective cohort study conducted at UBC

  • Inclusion Criteria: all patients who underwent a general surgery procedure if a resident was present at the time of operation.

  • Residents completed a questionnaire for each patient encounter.


Methods data collected

Patient

Resident

Methods: Data Collected

  • date

  • hospital

  • procedure

  • surgeon

  • nature of

    procedure

  • PGY level

  • operative role


Methods data collected1

Preoperative

Intraoperative

Postoperative

Methods: Data Collected

  • involvement in

    intraoperative

    decisions

  • outpatient clinic

  • emergency room

  • preoperative

    assessment room

  • decision to

    operate

  • outpatient clinic

  • daily ward rounds


Methods1

Methods

  • Missing data was identified and completed through interviews with residents.

  • Methodology validated through previously performed pilot study with vascular surgery residents and fellows.


Results

Results

  • 592 encounters

  • 3 academic hospitals–

  • 6 community hospitals–

  • 12 participating residents:

    • 5 juniors (PGY I-II)

    • 7 seniors (PGY III-VI)

VGH, SPH, BCCH

RCH, SMH, LGH, MSJ, EKRH, NRGH


Results1

Results

  • Resident Role:

    • Primary operator – 60.3%

    • 1st assistant – 29.9%

    • 2nd assistant – 9.1%

    • 3rd assistant – 0.2%

    • Teaching assistant – 0.5%


Dr a melck dr e webber dr r sidhu association for surgical education

Operative Cases by Type of Admission


Results procedures performed

Results: Procedures Performed


Results overall continuity of care

Results: Overall Continuity of Care


Factors affecting continuity of care elective vs emergency

Factors Affecting Continuity of Care: Electivevs. Emergency

* P<.001


Factors affecting continuity of care same day vs previously admitted elective surgery

Factors Affecting Continuity of Care: Same-day vs. Previously Admitted Elective Surgery

*P<0.001


Factors affecting continuity of care academic vs community hospital

Factors Affecting Continuity Of Care: Academic vs. Community Hospital

*P<.001


Results level of training

Results: Level of Training

  • Senior residents had a significantly higher rate of intraoperative decision-making (92% vs. 36%, p<0.001)


Summary

Summary

  • 80% cases are elective, majority of these are same-day admissions

  • Poor overall COC rate a result of poor preop assessment rate (27%)

  • Poor preop assessment rate most negatively affected by elective surgery (especially same-day admissions)


Summary1

Summary

  • Preoperative assessment and overall COC rates respectable for emergency (>70%) and previously-admitted elective cases (50%)

  • Dismal rate of outpatient post-discharge assessment (<1%)


Discussion

Discussion

  • Current training paradigms have not kept pace with changing realities of healthcare.

  • Training does not reflect actual practice patterns:

    • Majority of surgical decision-making occurs

      in ambulatory settings

    • Majority of training occurs in high acuity inpatient settings


Discussion1

Discussion

  • Despite work hour restrictions, COC rates are respectable for inpatients.

  • The continuum is lost when outpatient contact is required.

  • Changes in healthcare delivery have had the most negative impact on trainee COC experience.


Discussion2

Discussion

  • Must consider altering training structure:

    • mandated clinic experience

    • longer rotations

    • increased emphasis on preop assessment on day of surgery

    • resident-run ambulatory clinic

    • preceptor-based rotations


Conclusions

Conclusions

  • COC experiences of general surgery trainees are suboptimal, especially for preop and postop outpatient assessment.

  • Type of surgery impacts significantly on COC experiences.

  • Changes in healthcare delivery must be met with changes in the structure of training programs.


Thank you

Thank-You

Thank-you


  • Login